Common use of PROCEDURAL HISTORY Clause in Contracts

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On December 14, 2021, PG&E filed the Application of Pacific Gas and Electric Company in its 2021 Nuclear Decommissioning Cost Triennial Proceeding, A.▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇ (“2021 NDCTP Application”). A4NR, Cal Advocates, NCTC, SLO County, TURN and WEM each filed timely protests or responses to the 2021 NDCTP Application, to which PG&E responded on January 24, 2022. Southern California Edison Company (“SCE”) filed a motion for party status on February 15, 2022. During the telephonic prehearing conference held on February 17, 2022, Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) ▇▇▇▇▇ granted party status to SCE and to DHK. At the prehearing conference the parties specified issues agreed to be within the scope of proceeding, and those issues lacking consensus as to whether they were appropriately included within the scope of the proceeding. On April 19, 2022, Commissioner ▇▇▇▇▇ issued the Assigned Commissioner’s Scoping Memo and Ruling (“Scoping Memo”) which established the issues to be considered in the 2021 NDCTP. The Scoping Memo also requested comments on (1) whether the 2021 NDCTP should be consolidated with A.▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇, the Joint Application of SCE and San Diego Gas & Electric Company for the 2021 NDCTP (“SONGS NDCTP”); and (2) whether the Commission should conduct a site visit and/or public participation hearing for Humboldt Bay Power Plant (“HBPP”). PG&E, TURN, SCE, NCTC, SLO County, WEM and A4NR each filed comments on the Scoping Memo on April 29, 2022.1 yak tityu tityu yak tilhini Northern Chumash Cultural Preservation Kinship (“YTT Kinship”) and ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ moved for party status on March 7, 2022, and April 22, respectively; these motions were granted by email ruling on May 20, 2022. The Settling Parties actively and thoroughly reviewed the 2021 NDCTP Application, PG&E’s supporting testimony and site-specific decommissioning cost estimates. To enhance their understanding of the issues, the Settling Parties submitted, and PG&E responded to, a substantial number of data requests. On May 31, 2022, A4NR, Cal Advocates, NCTC, TURN SLO County, and WEM each served direct testimony. PG&E served rebuttal testimony addressing the issues raised by those parties who filed direct testimony on June 30, 2022. On July 7, 2022, ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ issued an Administrative Law Judge’s Ruling Noticing Date and Time of Public Participation Hearing and Authorizing PG&E to Deviate from The Notice Requirement Timelines of Rule 13.1(b). On August 10, 2022, ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ canceled the public participation hearing,2 and subsequently rescheduled public participation hearings for January 26 and 31, 2023.3

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On December 14, 2021, PG&E filed the Application of Pacific Gas and Electric Company in its 2021 Nuclear Decommissioning Cost Triennial Proceeding, A.▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇ (“2021 NDCTP Application”). A4NR, Cal Advocates, NCTC, SLO County, TURN and WEM each filed timely protests or responses to the 2021 NDCTP Application, to which PG&E responded on January 24, 2022. Southern California Edison Company (“SCE”) filed a motion for party status on February 15, 2022. During the telephonic prehearing conference held on February 17, 2022, Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) ▇▇▇▇▇ granted party status to SCE and to DHK. At the prehearing conference the parties specified issues agreed to be within the scope of proceeding, and those issues lacking consensus as to whether they were appropriately included within the scope of the this proceeding. On April 19, 2022, Commissioner ▇▇▇▇▇ issued the Assigned Commissioner’s Scoping Memo and Ruling (“Scoping Memo”) which established the issues to be considered in the 2021 NDCTP. The Scoping Memo also requested comments on (1) whether the 2021 NDCTP should be consolidated with A.▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇, the Joint Application of SCE and San Diego Gas & Electric Company for the 2021 NDCTP (“SONGS NDCTP”); and (2) whether the Commission should conduct a site visit and/or public participation hearing for Humboldt Bay Power Plant (“HBPP”). PG&E, TURN, SCE, NCTC, SLO County, WEM and A4NR each filed comments on the Scoping Memo on April 29, 2022.1 2022.1/ yak tityu tityu yak tilhini Northern Chumash Cultural Preservation Kinship (“YTT Kinship”) and ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ moved for party status on March 7, 2022, and April 22, respectively; these motions were granted by email ruling on May 20, 2022. 1/ The Commission elected not to consolidate PG&E's NDCTP with the SONGS NDCTP in Assigned Commissioner’s Scoping Memo and Ruling issued on May 24, 2022, in A.▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇. The Settling Parties actively and thoroughly reviewed the 2021 NDCTP Application, PG&E’s supporting testimony and site-specific decommissioning cost estimatesestimates (“DCEs”). To enhance their understanding of the issues, the Settling Parties submitted, and PG&E responded to, a substantial number of data requests. On May 31, 2022, A4NR, Cal Advocates, NCTC, TURN TURN, SLO County, and WEM each served direct testimony. PG&E served rebuttal testimony addressing the issues raised by those parties who filed direct testimony on June 30, 2022. On July 7, 2022, ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ issued an Administrative Law Judge’s Ruling Noticing Date and Time of Public Participation Hearing and Authorizing PG&E to Deviate from The Notice Requirement Timelines of Rule 13.1(b). On August 10, 2022, ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ canceled the public participation hearing,2 hearing,2/ and subsequently rescheduled public participation hearings for January 26 and 31, 2023.32023.3/

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On December 14September 8, 20211998, PG&E a document entitled the Unitil Restructuring Settlement Agreement ("Settlement Agreement") was executed and filed by the Application following parties (the “Settling Parties”): the Business and Industry Association of Pacific Gas New Hampshire (“BIA”); Cabletron Systems, Inc. (“Cabletron”); Enron Energy Services, Inc. (“Enron”); Freedom Partners, L.L.C. (“Freedom”); the Staff of the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission (“Staff”), the Office of Consumer Advocate (“OCA”); the Retail Merchants Association of New Hampshire (“RMA”), and the Unitil Companies: Concord Electric Company (“CECo”), Exeter & Hampton Electric Company (“E&H”), Unitil Service Corp. (“USC”), and Unitil Power Corp. (“UPC”) (collectively “Unitil”).1 The Settlement Agreement was intended to resolve most of the contested issues pertaining to Unitil in its 2021 Nuclear Decommissioning Cost Triennial Proceedingour restructuring proceeding, A.▇▇DR 96-▇▇150, to provide retail access and customer choice for Unitil’s customers by March 1, 1999, and to terminate Unitil’s involvement in the ongoing Federal litigation.2 A duly noticed Prehearing Conference was held on September 18, 1998. Technical sessions were conducted on September 18 and September 24, 1998, and intervenor testimony was filed on October 7, 1998 by the Governor’s Office of 1In addition to the above-stated parties, the Commission granted intervention to the Governor’s Office of Energy and Community Service (“GOECS”), the Campaign for Ratepayers’ Rights (“CRR”), State Representative ▇▇▇ (“2021 NDCTP Application”)▇. A4NR, Cal Advocates, NCTC, SLO County, TURN and WEM each filed timely protests or responses to the 2021 NDCTP Application, to which PG&E responded on January 24, 2022. Southern California Edison Company (“SCE”) filed a motion for party status on February 15, 2022. During the telephonic prehearing conference held on February 17, 2022, Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) ▇▇▇▇▇ granted party status to SCE and to DHK. At the prehearing conference the parties specified issues agreed to be within the scope of proceeding, and those issues lacking consensus as to whether they were appropriately included within the scope of the proceeding. On April 19, 2022, Commissioner ▇▇▇▇▇ issued the Assigned Commissioner’s Scoping Memo and Ruling (“Scoping Memo”) which established the issues to be considered in the 2021 NDCTP. The Scoping Memo also requested comments on (1) whether the 2021 NDCTP should be consolidated with A.▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇, the Joint Application of SCE and San Diego Gas & Electric Company for the 2021 NDCTP (“SONGS NDCTP”); and (2) whether the Commission should conduct a site visit and/or public participation hearing for Humboldt Bay Power Plant (“HBPP”). PG&E, TURN, SCE, NCTC, SLO County, WEM and A4NR each filed comments on the Scoping Memo on April 29, 2022.1 yak tityu tityu yak tilhini Northern Chumash Cultural Preservation Kinship (“YTT Kinship”) and ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ moved of PJA Energy Systems Designs, Granite State Electric Company (“GSEC”) and the New Hampshire Electric Cooperative, Inc. 2Under the Settlement the parties agreed to disagree on two issues to be presented to the Commission for party status on March 7determination: 1) use of the Unitil name and logo; and 2) the allocation of partial payments between a supplier and the distribution company for consolidated billing under the Trading Partner Agreement. Energy and Community Services (“GOECS”), 2022Enron, Staff and the OCA (jointly), and April 22▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, respectively; these motions were granted by email ruling ▇▇., P.E., Chief Engineer of the Commission. On October 12, 1998, the parties conducted a technical session and settlement conference and on May October 16, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ filed rebuttal testimony. As a result of the technical sessions and the settlement conference, Unitil and the other parties conducted further negotiations and agreed to an Amended Settlement on October 20, 20221998. The Settling Parties actively and thoroughly reviewed the 2021 NDCTP Application, PG&E’s supporting testimony and site-specific decommissioning cost estimates. To enhance their understanding of the issues, the Settling Parties submitted, and PG&E responded to, Amended Settlement addressed a substantial number of data requests. On May 31, 2022, A4NR, Cal Advocates, NCTC, TURN SLO County, issues and WEM each served direct testimony. PG&E served rebuttal concerns raised in the testimony addressing the issues raised by those parties who filed direct testimony on June 30, 2022. On July 7, 2022, of Representative ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ issued an Administrative Law Judge’s Ruling Noticing Date and Time of Public Participation Hearing and Authorizing PG&E to Deviate from The Notice Requirement Timelines of Rule 13.1(b). On August 10▇▇▇, 2022, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ canceled of the public participation hearing,2 GOECS, and subsequently rescheduled public participation ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. The parties to the Amended Settlement included all of the original signatories plus ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, Representative ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, CRR, EnerDev, Inc., and Granite State Taxpayers, Inc. The Commission held evidentiary hearings on October 21, 22, and 23, 1998. During the hearings, the Commission determined that the issue of transmission and distribution classification, addressed in ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ testimony, would be bifurcated and separately noticed. In addition, the Commission agreed to the Settling Parties’ recommendation that the two disputed issues - the use of the "Unitil" name and logo, and allocation of partial payments from customers - be briefed at a later date: November 12, 1998. The parties requested an oral decision of the Commission on the Amended Settlement by November 2, 1998. On October 30, 1998, the Commission's General Counsel sent a letter to all parties advising that the Commission had sought clarification from the Company of certain language in the Settlement Agreement concerning the Fixed Wind Down Costs, and was providing all parties a copy of the memorandum response received from Unitil. The Commission invited any party seeking to comment upon the memorandum or object to its inclusion in the record as an exhibit to do so by 10:00 a.m. November 2, 1998. No comments or objections were received. On October 30, 1998, the Commission submitted a record request to Unitil for January 26 and 31a schedule of the specific items, 2023.3by FERC subaccount, to be included in the Fixed Wind Down Costs.