Process of Review Clause Samples
Process of Review. By resolution, the Board of Supervisors shall provide a procedure whereby the involuntary dismissal, demotion, reduction in compensation, or suspension of an employee, shall at the employee's request, be reviewed to determine whether such action was justified and should be upheld. The procedure shall include the right, after notice, to a hearing before a designated body or officer having power to affirm, revoke or modify the action reviewed.
Process of Review. Each Review Period will contain a number of periods of set duration, as follows: Nomination Period 1 July until 21 July Issue Notification Period 1 August until 31 August Response Submission Period 1 September until 30 November Negotiations / agreed outcome 1 February until 30 April Ministerial consent and revised contract 1 May until 30 June
Process of Review i. Role of the School Faculty Review Committee (SFRC) After reviewing the self-study and supporting documentation, the SFRC will prepare a report, taking specific note of the accomplishments achieved during the period of time since the previous review. In the alternative, if deemed by the SFRC to be appropriate, the SFRC may make recommendations for further professional development in the areas of teaching, scholarship and service. The written report shall be provided to the faculty member and the ▇▇▇▇ on or before December 15, and the faculty member shall have fourteen (14) days within which to submit to the ▇▇▇▇ a written response to the SFRC report.
ii. Role of the ▇▇▇▇ & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ The ▇▇▇▇ shall review all of the material available including, but not limited to, the report from the SFRC, and prepare a ▇▇▇▇’▇ report on or before February
1. The ▇▇▇▇’▇ report may vary in form and will address the faculty member’s accomplishments in the three categories of teaching, scholarship, and service. The ▇▇▇▇ may also respond with recommendations for further professional development in any of the three categories. The faculty member shall have an opportunity to respond in writing to the ▇▇▇▇’▇ evaluation report on or before February 15. The ▇▇▇▇ shall then submit their evaluation report in writing to the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, with a copy to the faculty member. The ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ will issue their report, with a copy to the ▇▇▇▇ and faculty member on or before March 30.
iii. Classroom Observations & Student Course Surveys The SFRC review will also include the results of student course surveys and results of classroom observations by the ▇▇▇▇ of the school and/or department chair. See Article VIII.E.1.
iv. Schedule of Post-Tenure Review Oct. 1 Faculty submits materials Dec. 15 SFRC issues report Dec. 29 Faculty deadline for submitting written response to SFRC report Feb. 1 ▇▇▇▇ issues report Feb. 15 Faculty deadline for submitting written response to ▇▇▇▇’▇ Report Mar. 30 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ issues report 2608 2609 2610 2611 2612
Process of Review. In this Chapter, a technical review of the Early Warning Systems (EWS) existing for the major hazards in Bangladesh are discussed. Review of each of the major hazards with their profound prediction, forecasting, technical preparedness measures, tools/models are carried out to better understand the existing context of hazard specific early warning system in operation. In this respect, the following major hazard EWSs (and for earthquake preparedness only) were explored: • Flood • Cyclone • Riverbank erosion • Earthquake (preparedness initiatives) • Tsunami • Flash flood • Drought, and • Climate change (as a trend that are anticipated to increase other hazards) The reviews are based on primarily on the secondary sources of the respective institutional documentations, project documents and or research outputs. The institutionally shared information through our outreach and discussions with respective sources agencies such as FFWC, BMD, ADPC EWS and so forth are carried out to collect more context based documentations. Agencies have shared their information with a good willingness and with a great deal on commitment towards developing a central level DMIN. The source agencies are also expressed their willingness to support DMIN through consultation and information sharing in future. ADPC-BCAS field team has carried out an outreach and interviewed the disaster management information source agencies and related institutions with a simple checklist and collected documents and information that are used in this Chapter and in the following two chapters as well in a sequential manner. The process of collection of information and validation remained as below: Outreach and interview “Information Source” agency representatives