Professional Practice Rating Appeal, Policy 4170 Clause Samples

The 'Professional Practice Rating Appeal' clause under Policy 4170 establishes a formal process for employees to challenge or appeal their professional practice ratings. Typically, this clause outlines the steps an employee must follow to initiate an appeal, such as submitting a written request within a specified timeframe and providing supporting documentation or evidence. It may also describe the review process, including who will consider the appeal and the possible outcomes. The core function of this clause is to ensure fairness and transparency in performance evaluations by providing employees with a structured opportunity to contest ratings they believe are inaccurate or unjust.
Professional Practice Rating Appeal, Policy 4170. 2 1. The appeal process established herein is intended to be consistent with state ▇▇▇▇▇▇/or existing regulations established by the Colorado Department of Education, including “Process for Non- Probationary Teacher to Appeal Second Consecutive Performance Evaluation Rating of Ineffective or Partially Effective” (CDE Reg. 5.04, et seq.). 2. A non-probationary teacher with an Overall Professional Practice or Final Effectiveness rating of partially effective or ineffective for the second (2nd) consecutive year may choose to appeal to the District Professional Practice Review Team (DPPRT) for a rating change to any quality standard(s) or element(s) rated less than proficient. This appeal request will not be denied. 3. The appeal process will take place only if voluntarily initiated by the non-probationary teacher whose Final Evaluation Rating was ineffective or partially effective for two consecutive years. The teacher’s appeal will be in writing and provided to theprincipal, the DPPRT, and, if the teacher wishes, to the president of CCEA. 4. The DPPRT will act as an advisory committee to the Superintendent. The Superintendent, or his or her designee, will be the final decision-making authority in determining the teacher’s final Performance Evaluation Rating and whether a non- probationary teacher will lose his or her non-probationary status. The Superintendent, or designee, will provide a written rationale for his or her final determination. 5. The process for the appeal of a second consecutive Overall Professional Practice or Final Effectiveness Rating of partially effective or ineffective shall conclude no more than forty-five (45) calendar days after the final evaluation conference and receipt of the final Evaluation documents. 6. A teacher will initiate an appeal within fifteen (15) calendar days after the final conference and receipt of the final written evaluationdocuments. Failure to acknowledge receipt of the summative evaluation by signing waives a teacher’s right to appeal the evaluation. 7. The timeline identified in section (A)(5) and (A)(6) above shall run concurrently,and may be waived, by mutual agreement between the Teacher and the DPPRT. 8. The District will identify the chairperson on the DPPRT who will, among othertasks, receive all official documents related to the appeal process. 9. Within one calendar day, the DPPRT will provide written notice to the teacher ofthe receipt of the teacher’s appeal. a. This notice will also contain a list ...

Related to Professional Practice Rating Appeal, Policy 4170

  • Commercial Practices Borrower assumes all risks of the acts or omissions of any LC Beneficiary or transferees of any Letter of Credit with respect to the use of such Letter of Credit. Borrower agrees that neither any LC Issuing Bank, Administrative Agent nor any Lender (nor any of their respective directors, officers, or employees) shall be liable or responsible for: (a) the use which may be made of any Letter of Credit or for any acts or omissions of any LC Beneficiary or transferee in connection therewith; (b) any reference which may be made to this Agreement or to any Letter of Credit in any agreements, instruments or other documents; (c) the validity, sufficiency or genuineness of documents other than the Letters of Credit, or of any endorsement(s) thereon, even if such documents should in fact prove to be in any or all respects invalid, insufficient, fraudulent or forged or any statement therein proved to be untrue or inaccurate in any respect whatsoever; (d) payment by any LC Issuing Bank against presentation of documents which do not strictly comply with the terms of the applicable Letter of Credit, including failure of any documents to bear any reference or adequate reference to such Letter of Credit; or (e) any other circumstances whatsoever in making or failing to make payment under any Letter of Credit, except only that an LC Issuing Bank shall be liable to Borrower for acts or events described in clauses (a) through (e) above, to the extent, but only to the extent, of any direct damages, as opposed to indirect, special or consequential damages, suffered by Borrower which Borrower proves were caused by (i) any LC Issuing Bank’s willful misconduct or gross negligence in determining whether a drawing made under the applicable Letter of Credit complies with the terms and conditions therefor stated in such Letter of Credit or (ii) any LC Issuing Bank’s willful failure to pay under any Letter of Credit after a drawing by the respective LC Beneficiary strictly complying with the terms and conditions of the applicable Letter of Credit. Without limiting the foregoing, any LC Issuing Bank may accept any document that appears on its face to be in order, without responsibility for further investigation. Borrower hereby waives any right to object to any payment made under a Letter of Credit with regard to a drawing that is in the form provided in such Letter of Credit but which varies with respect to punctuation (except punctuation with respect to any Dollar amount specified therein), capitalization, spelling or similar matters of form.

  • Insurance Company Rating The required insurance must be written by a company approved to do business in the State or Texas with a financial standing of at least an A- rating, as reflected in Best’s insurance ratings or by a similar rating system recognized within the insurance industry at the time the policy is issued.

  • PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY (APPLIES TO RNS ONLY 19.01 The parties agree that resident care is enhanced if concerns relating to professional practice and workload are resolved in a timely and effective manner, as set out below; In the event that the Home assigns a number of residents or a workload to an individual employee or group of employees, such that she or they have cause to believe that she or they are being asked to perform more work than is consistent with proper resident care, she or they shall: i) At the time the workload issue occurs, discuss the issue within the Home to develop strategies to meet resident care needs using current resources. If necessary, using established lines of communication, seek immediate assistance from an individual(s) identified by the Home who has responsibility for timely resolution of workload issues. ii) Failing resolution at the time of occurrence of the workload issue, complain in writing to the Union-Management Committee within twenty (20) calendar days of the alleged improper assignment. The chairperson of the Union-Management Committee shall convene a meeting of the Union-Management Committee within twenty (20) calendar days of the filing of the complaint. The Union-Management Committee shall hear and attempt to resolve the complaint to the satisfaction of both parties. The Employer will provide a written response to the Union, with a copy to the ONA representation within ten (10) calendar days. iii) Prior to the complaint being forwarded to the Independent Assessment Committee, the Union may forward a written report outlining the complaint and recommendations to the Director of Resident Care and/or the Administrator. iv) At any time during this process, the parties may agree to the use of a mediator to assist in the resolution of the Professional Practice issues. v) Any settlement arrived at under 19.01 (a) i) – iii) shall be signed by the parties. vi) Failing resolution of the complaint within twenty (20) calendar days of the meeting of the Union-Management Committee, the complaint shall be forwarded to an independent Assessment Committee composed of three (3) registered nurses; one chosen by the Ontario Nurses' Association, one chosen by the Home and one chosen from a panel of independent registered nurses who are well respected within the profession. The member of the Committee chosen from the panel of independent registered nurses shall act as Chairperson. vii) The Independent Assessment Committee shall set a date to conduct a hearing into the complaint, within twenty (20) calendar days of its appointment, and shall be empowered to investigate as is necessary to properly assess the merits of the complaint. The Independent Assessment Committee shall report its findings, in writing, to the parties within twenty (20) calendar days following completion of its hearing. (b) i) The list of Independent Assessment Committee Chairpersons is attached as Appendix “B”. The members of the panel shall sit in rotation as agreed by the parties. If a panel member is unable to sit within the time limit stipulated, the panel member next scheduled to sit will be appointed by the parties.

  • Money Market Fund Compliance Testing and Reporting Services Subject to the authorization and direction of the Trust and, in each case where appropriate, the review and comment by the Trust’s independent accountants and legal counsel, and in accordance with procedures that may be established from time to time between the Trust and the Administrator, the Administrator will:

  • Income Protection, Trauma and Journey Insurance The Employer is, and will remain during the life of this Agreement, a participating employer in the Nominated Redundancy Fund and an employer member of IPT Agency Co Ltd. IPT Agency Co Ltd administers the insurance schemes covering income protection, trauma and journey accidents (Income Protection, Trauma and Journey Accidents Insurance Schemes).