Program Governance Sample Clauses

Program Governance. The Awardee is responsible for the overall management of the project development program and related program decisions. The Government will have continuous involvement with the Awardee. The Awardee shall provide access to project results in accordance with the Awardee’s Project Timeline located in Appendix A.

Program Governance. (a) Bank and Company each shall assign, on a full time basis, an employee knowledgeable about the Program and the Transaction Agreements to serve as its liaison to the other party with regard to the day-to-day operation of the Program. Bank's employee shall be referred to as the "Bank Program Coordinator" and Company's employee shall be referred to as the "Company Program Coordinator." Each party agrees that it will seek the input of the other party before it makes its Program Coordinator appointment, including any future appointments to replace a Program Coordinator. (b) The parties agree to participate and cooperate fully in the governance structure in accordance with Exhibit 3.14(b).

Program Governance. 1. Coordinating Council: A nine (9) member Coordinating Council composed of a representative from each of Arkansas City, College, County, Winfield, RCB Bank, and Union State Bank, the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Field Commission, with two additional selected at-large representatives appointed by the permanent members of the Coordinating Council, will make up the Coordinating Council and shall act as an Executive Committee for the ▇▇▇▇▇▇ First program. The Coordinating Council, by mutual agreement, may amend the membership of the Council to adapt to program priorities and changing circumstances.

Program Governance. The Awardee is responsible for the overall management of the project development program and related program decisions. The Government will have continuous involvement with the Awardee concerning SOW’s directly associated with this Agreement. The Awardee shall provide access to project results in accordance with the Awardee’s Project Timeline located in Appendix A. Agreement is formally revised by the AO and made part of this Agreement. Any modification to this Agreement to account for recommended changes in the SOW or Payable Milestones will be considered a supplemental agreement.

Program Governance. The current DCS program governance consists of DCS governance committees which provide forums for leadership, oversight, solution and decision making for enterprise-level matters related to the DCS program. This program governance model will be expanded to include Managed Application Services Customers and Service Providers. The committees are consensus decision-making bodies, with one representative from each partner group and DIR, which make strategic enterprise decisions and resolve escalated issues. The governance committees comprise the Business Executive Leadership Committee, the IT Leadership Committee, and four solution groups: a. Contracts and Finance b. Service Delivery c. Technology d. Transformation DIR may form one or more additional solution groups focused on Managed Applications Services. MAS Service Providers will be expected to participate in the current governance committees as well. The solution groups focus on their designated subject areas and comprise experienced IT managers with expertise in those areas. The IT Leadership Committee decides strategic technical decisions, resolves escalated issues and comprises IT directors of Customers and the DIR Statewide Technology Centers Division Director. The Business Executive Leadership Committee addresses strategic business decisions regarding the DCS program, monitors the business relationship, and resolves issues escalated by the IT Leadership Committee. The Business Executive Committee comprises Deputy Executive Director-level business executives representing partner groups and the DIR Executive Director and the DIR Chief Operating Officer. DIR’s role includes interpreting the contract from the State’s perspective, executing contract oversight, sustaining governance processes and promoting effective communication. DIR participates as a chair or co-chair on all governance committees with responsibility to coordinate topics spanning multiple groups and to facilitate execution of decisions. Service Providers participate in governance as required to identify technical options for solving issues, participate in collaborative solution development, and provide their technical and business perspective.

Program Governance. In order to mitigate potential construction risk of the Third Amendment Projects (and the Program, if the City ultimately proceeds with construction of the full Program) and make informed decisions throughout design of the CTP and the remainder of the Program and execution of the Third Amendment Projects, a governance committee structure is hereby established to aid in obtaining Signatory Airline support and approval of design; to monitor cost, budget, funding, contracts, and their changes; to meet regulatory and statutory compliance standards; to receive and evaluate input from the Signatory Airlines; to document reporting processes and generate information for decision-making; to demonstrate the City’s and the Signatory Airlines’ involvement in the day-to-day management of capital programs; and to provide accountability and transparency. The Third Amendment Projects shall be governed through a four-part structure, shown graphically on Attachment 1, which begins at “Level 0,” and escalates to higher levels based upon the dollar value of such decisions and/or the inability to resolve disputes of the tier below to escalate to higher-level decision-makers. All Third Amendment Project design and construction contracts, change orders, and uses of contingency must be endorsed by the applicable tier of the Program’s governance team prior to submitting for approval to the appropriate City or Airport official or governing body.

Program Governance. The Statewide Technology Centers governance consists of governance committees which provide forums for leadership, oversight, solution and decision making for enterprise-level matters related to Statewide Technology services. The committees are consensus decision-making bodies, with one representative from each partner group and DIR, which make strategic enterprise decisions and resolve escalated issues. The governance committees comprise the Business Executive Leadership Committee, the IT Leadership Committee, and four solution groups: a. Contracts and Finance b. Service Delivery c. Technology d. Security e. Geographic Information Systems The solution groups focus on their designated subject areas and comprise experienced IT managers with expertise in those areas. The IT Leadership Committee decides strategic technical decisions, resolves escalated issues and comprises IT directors of Customers and the DIR Statewide Technology Center Operations Division Director. The Business Executive Leadership Committee addresses strategic business decisions regarding Statewide Technology services such as Data Center Services (DCS), Geographic Information System (GIS) services and Managed Security Services and also monitors the business relationship, and resolves issues escalated by the IT Leadership Committee. The Business Executive Committee comprises Deputy Executive Director-level business executives representing partner groups and the DIR Executive Director and Deputy Executive Director. DIR’s role includes interpreting the contract from the State’s perspective, executing contract oversight, sustaining governance processes and promoting effective communication. DIR participates as a chair or co-chair on all governance committees with responsibility to coordinate topics spanning multiple groups and to facilitate execution of decisions. STC Service Providers participate in governance as required by governance group charters to identify technical options for solving issues, participate in collaborative solution development, and provide their technical and business perspective.

Program Governance. (a) Bank and JCPenney each shall assign, on a full time basis, an employee knowledgeable about the Program and the Relationship Agreements to serve as its liaison to the other party with regard to the day-to-day operation of the Program. Bank’s employee shall be referred to as the “Bank Program Coordinator” and JCPenney’s employee shall be referred to as the “JCPenney Program Coordinator.” Bank agrees that it will appoint a Senior Vice President as the Bank Program Coordinator to be responsible for the day-to-day operation of the Program. JCPenney agrees that it will appoint a senior manager at the director level as the JCPenney Program Coordinator, provided, however, that JCPenney shall make such appointment within sixty (60) days after the date hereof. Each party agrees that it will seek the input of the other party before it makes its Program Coordinator appointment, including any future appointments to replace a Program Coordinator. In addition, each of Bank and JCPenney shall appoint an employee to be a full-time liaison to resolve high-level service issues. (b) The parties agree to participate and cooperate fully in the governance structure in accordance with Exhibit I.

Program Governance. (a) Bank and JCPenney each shall assign, on a full time basis, an employee knowledgeable about the Program to serve as its liaison to the other party with regard to the day‑to-day operation of the Program (a “Program Coordinator”). Bank’s employee shall be referred to as the “Bank Program Coordinator” and JCPenney’s employee shall be referred to as the “JCPenney Program Coordinator.” Bank agrees that it will appoint a Senior Vice President as the Bank Program Coordinator to be responsible for the day-to-day operation of the Program. JCPenney will have the right to interview the Bank Program Coordinator. JCPenney agrees that it will appoint a senior manager at the Vice President level as the JCPenney Program Coordinator. (b) Upon the inability of the Program Coordinators to resolve a disagreement or dispute, the parties agree to participate and cooperate fully in the dispute resolution process in Schedule 3.18(b) (Dispute Resolution).