Project Permitting Sample Clauses
Project Permitting. (a) The Buyer shall be solely responsible for applying for and obtaining any and all governmental permits and approvals required by Applicable Laws for the construction of Buyer’s Project (the “Approvals”), prior to the Time of Closing (as such term is defined herein). Upon the expiration of the Due Diligence Period, Seller shall reasonably cooperate with Buyer in connection with ▇▇▇▇▇’s application for Approvals, including executing any documents necessary therefor, but in no event shall Seller incur any liability in connection therewith.
(b) Buyer shall use diligent and good faith efforts to obtain the Approvals for the construction of Buyer’s Project by the Time of Closing. In no event will Buyer be deemed to have used diligent efforts to obtain the Approvals unless the Buyer submits completed applications for the Approvals in the timeframes provided in the schedule attached hereto as Exhibit F.
Project Permitting. The detailed treatment plans will be used to initiate construction permitting activities. Permitting for proposed actions may include a Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application (JARPA), permits from the appropriate land management agency (USDA-FS or Skagit County), and consultation with federal fish management agencies (USFWS, NMFS). Any changes to the design plans identified through the permitting process will be documented in final design plans developed for each site.
Project Permitting. The Buyer shall be solely responsible for applying for and obtaining any and all governmental permits and approvals required by law for the construction of the Buyer’s Project (the “Approvals”), prior to the Time of Closing (as such term is defined herein). Upon the expiration of the Due Diligence Period, the Seller shall reasonably cooperate with the Buyer in connection with the Buyer’s application for Approvals, including executing any documents necessary therefor, but in no event shall Seller incur any liability in connection therewith. The Buyer’s application for its comprehensive permit for the Buyer’s Project shall contain schematic design drawings, which include conceptual site plans, architectural drawings and building elevations that are substantially similar to the Schematic Design Plans. The Buyer covenants and agrees that it shall not materially alter the Schematic Design Plans during the site plan approval process or otherwise unless required by the ZBA. In the event that the Schematic Design Plans are materially altered because of a requirement by the ZBA or by law, the Buyer shall promptly submit such material changes to the Seller for its review, but not for its approval. The Buyer shall provide the Seller with three (3) hard copies and an electronic copy of the Schematic Design Plans (in a form acceptable to the Seller’s Building Department) approved by the Seller and the ZBA. The Buyer shall use diligent and good faith efforts to obtain the Approvals for the construction of the Buyer’s Project by the Time of Closing (as hereinafter defined in Section 4.1). In no event will the Buyer be deemed to have used diligent efforts to obtain the Approvals unless the Buyer submits completed applications for the Approvals in the timeframes provided in the schedule attached hereto as Exhibit E. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent that the Buyer is delayed in obtaining all of the Approvals necessary to construct the Buyer’s Project due solely to the actions or inactions of a permit granting authority, then the Buyer may request, and the Select Board, in its sole discretion, may extend the Time of Closing, without requiring the Buyer to pay any additional deposit, for the period of time that the Seller determines, in its sole and absolute discretion, that the Buyer has been delayed by such permit granting authority.
Project Permitting. Upon finalization of the route for the Underground Alignment, National Grid shall, with the support of the other parties hereto, seek all permits and approvals required for the Underground Alignment as provided in the Settlement Agreement.
Project Permitting. Request For A Pre-Application Review process started -- Nevada County Planning land use pre-application request: ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/DocumentCenter/View/12212/Pre- application-Request-PDF
Project Permitting. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ shall work with the City on obtaining the necessary permits that will be required to construct the project. The tasks performed shall include: Plan Sheet(s) showing the location of BMP’s. Details & Standard Plans of BMP’s to be used. 3-ring binder complete with permit and supporting documents Fill out Notice of Intent (NOI). o Submittal of the NOI is the responsibility of Client. At the preconstruction meeting, yet to be scheduled, the needed maintenance & updating of the plan through completion and seeding will be discussed. Client will provide to ▇▇▇▇▇▇ the following: Name, address, phone number and e-mail of the onsite ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ who will be responsible for the SWPPP and inspections during construction.
Project Permitting. (i) Judicial Council, State Fire ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, or otherwise applicable Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) permitting fees.
(ii) Utility interconnection process (upgrade costs on the Utility side of the meter should not be included in the Proposal cost).
(iii) All appropriate safety signage, as required by the Utility.
(iv) Adequately sized and visible disconnect switches at or near each point of common coupling.
Project Permitting. The Consultant will assist the City in preparing applications for permits from governmental authorities that have jurisdiction to approve the design of the project and participate in consultations with such authorities, as necessary. The Consultant shall prepare the following documents for the project: • IDNR Water Supply Section – Construction Permit Application • IDNR NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit • Notice of Publication • Pollution Prevention Plan • IDNR Wastewater Construction Permit Application Any fees for construction permits, licenses, or other costs associated with permits and approvals shall be the responsibility of the Consultant. The Consultant shall prepare the permit applications and other documentation and file the applications for permits.
Project Permitting. ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇ of ▇▇▇▇▇ Environmental Group conducted several additional site visits to assess the dimensions of the mid-channel gravel bar in more detail than captured in the PACD site survey, to collect photos for permit applications and to evaluate site access constraints and limitations surrounding a sewer cleanout pipe and municipal water line that appeared to run directly under the property access area to develop a final plan set. BCCD was advised that two permit applications would be necessary for this project. ▇▇▇▇▇ Environmental Group prepared and submitted applications for these permits. First, an application for a Restoration Waiver, Waiver 16 under PA DEP Chapter 105 regulations, was needed. BCCD was advised by PA DEP that the waiver could encompass the dam removal, mid-channel gravel bar removal and downstream streambank restoration within one application. The waiver application was filed in early 2011, at which point a review of the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan was included in the Waiver 16 review. Therefore, no Erosion and Sediment Control Plan was required to be submitted for review to BCCD. In addition, a Highway Occupancy permit was required to access the project site with heavy equipment directly from Milford Square Pike. A few setbacks were encountered during the plan development and permitting phase. First, although a PA One Call was completed during the design phase, no response was received from the water & sewer authorities to provide definitive information on the location and depth of pipes beneath the proposed access area, despite repeated attempts at contact by ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇. As a conservative approach, ▇▇▇▇▇ proposed using steel plates at the access area to distribute the weight of the machinery entering and exiting the site. In addition, the owner of the former mill approximately 600 feet downstream raised repeated concerns of the potential for increased flooding and/or damage to her property that could result from the completion of the project. The landowner also expressed concern that the property rights to the dam were attached to the mill. BCCD conducted additional research at the County Recorder of Deeds and did not locate any evidence that would support the claim. BCCD corresponded with and met with the mill owner on several occasions; in addition, ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇ of ▇▇▇▇▇ Environmental Group met with BCCD and a representative of the downstream landowner. During the meetings, it was stressed that the sediment loss from the bank ero...
Project Permitting. Dam Releases for reasons other than FRM, including any potential effects on Species and/or Habitat;