Protection against Hacking Clause Samples

The 'Protection against Hacking' clause establishes measures and responsibilities to safeguard systems, data, or services from unauthorized access or cyberattacks. It typically outlines the security protocols that must be implemented, such as firewalls, encryption, or regular security audits, and may assign liability in the event of a breach. This clause's core function is to mitigate the risk of hacking incidents, ensuring both parties are aware of their obligations to maintain cybersecurity and clarifying accountability if a security compromise occurs.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Protection against Hacking. Playback licenses, revocation certificates and security-critical data shall use commercially reasonable cryptographic protection methods to deter against tampering, forging, and spoofing. The content protection system shall employ industry accepted tamper-resistant technology on hardware and software components (e.g., to deter such hacks as a clock rollback, spoofing, use of common debugging tools, and intercepting unencrypted content in memory buffers). For software-only implementations on open computing platforms (e.g., personal computers), the content protection system shall employ tamper resistant software. Examples of tamper resistant software techniques include: (a) Code obfuscation example: The executable binary dynamically encrypts and decrypts itself in memory, so that the algorithm is not unnecessarily exposed to disassembly or reverse engineering.
View SourceView Similar (12)
Protection against Hacking. 3.7.1. Playback licenses, revocation certificates, and security-critical data shall be cryptographically protected against tampering, forging, and spoofing. 3.7.2. The Content Protection System shall employ industry accepted tamper-resistant technology on hardware and software components (e.g., technology to prevent such hacks as a clock rollback, spoofing, use of common debugging tools, and intercepting unencrypted content in memory buffers). Examples of techniques included in tamper-resistant technology are: 3.7.2.1. Code and data obfuscation: The executable binary dynamically encrypts and decrypts itself in memory so that the algorithm is not unnecessarily exposed to disassembly or reverse engineering.
View SourceView Similar (9)
Protection against Hacking. Playback licenses, revocation certificates, and security-critical data shall be cryptographically protected against tampering, forging, and spoofing. The content protection system shall employ industry accepted tamper-resistant technology on hardware and software components (e.g., to prevent such hacks as a clock rollback, spoofing, use of common debugging tools, and intercepting unencrypted content in memory buffers). The content protection system shall implement secure internal data channels to prevent rogue processes from intercepting data transmitted between system processes. The content protection system shall prevent the use of media player filters or plug-ins that can be exploited to gain unauthorized access to content (e.g.: access to the decrypted but still encoded content by inserting a shim between the DRM and the player).
View SourceView Similar (2)
Protection against Hacking. Playback licenses, revocation certificates, and security-critical data shall be cryptographically protected against tampering, forging, and spoofing. The content protection system shall employ industry accepted tamper-resistant technology on hardware and software components (e.g., to prevent such hacks as a clock rollback, spoofing, use of common debugging tools, and intercepting unencrypted content in memory buffers). For software-only implementations on open computing platforms (e.g., personal computers), the content protection system shall employ tamper resistant software. Examples of tamper resistant software techniques include: Code obfuscation example: The executable binary dynamically encrypts and decrypts itself in memory, so that the algorithm is not unnecessarily exposed to disassembly or reverse engineering. Integrity detection example: Using one-way cryptographic hashes of the executable code segments and/or self-referential integrity dependencies, the trusted software fails to execute if it is altered prior to or during runtime. Anti-debugging example: The decryption engine prevents the use of common debugging tools. The content protection system implements secure internal data channels to prevent rogue processes from intercepting data transmitted between system processes as soon as possible after such secure internal data channels are commercially-available or are otherwise feasible. The content protection system shall prevent the use of media player filters or plug-ins that can be exploited to gain unauthorized access to content (e.g.: access to the decrypted but still encoded content by inserting a shim between the DRM and the player).
View SourceView Similar (2)
Protection against Hacking. Any system used to protect Licensed Content must support the following:
View Source

Related to Protection against Hacking

  • Protection Against Dilution If the Corporation, with respect to the Common Stock, (1) pays a dividend or makes a distribution on shares of Common Stock that is paid in shares of Common Stock or in securities convertible into or exchangeable for Common Stock (in which latter event the number of shares of Common Stock initially issuable upon the conversion or exchange of such securities shall be deemed to have been distributed), (2) subdivides outstanding shares of Common Stock, (3) combines outstanding shares of Common Stock into a smaller number of shares, or (4) issues by reclassification of Common Stock any shares of capital stock of the Corporation, the number of shares as to which this Warrant is exercisable as of the date of such event and the Exercise Price in effect immediately prior thereto shall be adjusted so that each Holder thereafter shall be entitled to receive the number and kind of shares of Common Stock or other capital stock of the Corporation that it would have owned or been entitled to receive in respect of this Warrant immediately after the happening of any of the events described above had this Warrant been converted immediately prior to the happening of that event; provided that the aggregate purchase price payable for the total numbers of shares of Common Stock purchasable under this Warrant shall remain the same. An adjustment made in accordance with this section shall become effective immediately after the record date, in the case of a dividend, and shall become effective immediately after the effective date, in the case of a subdivision, combination, or reclassification. If, as a result of an adjustment made in accordance with this Section 4, the Holder becomes entitled to receive shares of two or more classes of capital stock or shares of Common Stock and other capital stock of the Corporation, the board of directors (whose determination shall be conclusive) shall determine the allocation of the adjusted Exercise Rate between or among shares of such classes of capital stock or shares of Common Stock and other capital stock.

  • Claims Against Third Parties The Licensee shall, as soon as it becomes aware, give DACS in writing full particulars of any infringements or violations of any of DACS’ / the Artist’s rights in the Work.

  • Complaints Against Teachers Communication between the Community and the School ideally should be such that most complaints may be resolved through personal conferences at the School level. Various avenues of contact between teacher, pupil, parent, principal and other appropriate staff personnel should be pursued before using the formal procedures outlined below. The following process shall not be used when allegations involve legal or criminal violations or allegations of misconduct towards a student, such as abuse or discrimination. Such allegations shall be investigated in accordance with board policy and in conjunction with the authorities, consistent with principles of due process. 1. The Complainant shall be given a copy of this Part II, Section J and be told that there are contractual requirements for the District to follow. 2. If such conferences do not lead to understanding and resolution of problems involved, a parent may pursue further action by submitting a complaint against a teacher, which must be submitted in writing to the principal of the school. The principal shall give a copy to the teacher. Likewise, the teacher may request in writing to the principal that such a written complaint must be filed or the matter shall be considered closed. The principal shall give a copy to the parent. 3. After a written complaint is filed, if requested by the complainant or the teacher, a meeting involving the teacher, the principal, and the complainant will be arranged as soon as possible to discuss the complaint. 4. If it is not resolved at that level to the satisfaction of the Complainant, the Complainant may appeal to the Superintendent. 5. If it is still unresolved to the satisfaction of the Complainant, the Complainant may appeal to the Board of Education.

  • Violence Against Women The parties hereby recognize and share the concern that women uniquely face situations of violence or abuse in their personal lives that may affect their attendance or performance at work. A woman who is in an abusive or violent personal or domestic situation will not be subjected to discipline without giving full consideration to the facts in the case of each individual and the circumstances surrounding the incident otherwise supportive of discipline. This statement of intent is subject to a standard of good faith on the part of the Employer, the Union and the affected employees and will not be utilized by the Union or the employees to subvert the application of otherwise appropriate disciplinary measures.

  • SAFEGUARD AGAINST FRAUD 11.1 The Supplier shall take all reasonable steps, in accordance with Good Industry Practice, to prevent any fraudulent activity (including Fraud) by the Supplier and the Supplier’s Staff (which for the purposes of this Clause 11 (Safeguard Against Fraud) shall include its shareholders holding in excess of the fifty (50) percent of the entire issued share capital of the Supplier and directors). 11.2 The Supplier shall notify the Authority immediately if it has reason to suspect that any Fraud has occurred, is occurring or is likely to occur save where complying with this provision would cause the Supplier or its employees to commit an offence under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 or the Terrorism Act 2000. 11.3 If the Supplier or the Supplier’s Staff commits Fraud in relation to this Framework Agreement, a Call-Off Contract or any other contract with the Crown (including the Authority), the Authority may: 11.3.1 terminate this Framework Agreement with immediate effect by giving the Supplier notice in writing, and recover from the Supplier the amount of any loss suffered by the Authority resulting from such termination, including the cost reasonably incurred by the Authority of making other arrangements for the supply of the Services and any additional expenditure incurred by the Authority throughout the remainder of the Term; or 11.3.2 recover in full from the Supplier and the Supplier shall on demand indemnify in full and hold the Authority harmless from and against any other loss sustained by the Authority in consequence of any breach of this Clause 11 (Safeguard Against Fraud).