PROVIDER PAYMENT ARRANGEMENTS; VALUE-BASED PROGRAMS Clause Samples

The "Provider Payment Arrangements; Value-Based Programs" clause defines how payments to healthcare providers are structured, particularly in the context of value-based care initiatives. It typically outlines the terms under which providers are compensated, such as through bundled payments, shared savings, or performance-based incentives, rather than traditional fee-for-service models. This clause ensures that both parties understand the financial mechanisms tied to quality and efficiency metrics, promoting alignment of incentives and supporting the shift toward improved patient outcomes and cost control.
PROVIDER PAYMENT ARRANGEMENTS; VALUE-BASED PROGRAMS. 5.1 Provider Payment Arrangements. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ will be responsible for negotiating and entering into separate payment arrangements with health care providers. Such provider payment arrangements and agreements shall apply to services by such providers for all Members entitled to benefits under plans insured or administered by Wellmark, including Members under this Plan. Wellmark shall determine, in its sole discretion, the payment arrangements with health care providers including, without limitation, the Maximum Allowable Fees for Incurred Claims. Without limiting the foregoing, Wellmark may compensate providers pursuant to a variety of payment arrangements, including the following: a. Fee for service arrangements, including, without limitation, per diem and percent of charge arrangements;

Related to PROVIDER PAYMENT ARRANGEMENTS; VALUE-BASED PROGRAMS

  • SALARY SACRIFICE ARRANGEMENTS 34.1 Employees covered by this Agreement will have access to salary sacrifice arrangements in addition to the compulsory arrangement detailed above. The requirements of any such arrangements shall ensure that: (a) Accessing a salary sacrifice arrangement is a voluntary decision to be made by the individual Employee. (b) An Employee wishing to enter into a salary sacrifice arrangement will be required to notify their Employer in writing of the intention to do so and have sought expert advice in relation to entering into such an arrangement. (c) The Employer shall meet the cost of implementing the administrative and payroll arrangements necessary for the introduction of salary sacrifice to the Employees under the Agreement. (d) The co-contribution of superannuation payments referred to herein shall be made by way of salary sacrifice arrangements.

  • Compensation Arrangements (a) Following receipt of an RoU Claim Notice in respect of a Type 2 Restriction of Use, Network Rail and the Train Operator shall (if they have not already done so) commence negotiations in respect of the RoU Direct Costs compensation to be paid by one party to the other in respect of such Type 2 Restriction of Use and, subject to paragraph 10, shall continue such negotiations in good faith until they are concluded. (b) Once the compensation referred to in paragraph 6.1(a) has been agreed or determined (and has been compared against any amounts calculated under paragraph 4 together with any other amounts paid or due to the Train Operator from Network Rail in relation to such Restriction of Use) then, in the event of: (i) a shortfall for the Train Operator, the compensation to be paid by Network Rail to the Train Operator shall be the full amount of the RoU Direct Costs actually incurred by the Train Operator less any amounts calculated under paragraph 4 which have already been paid or are due for such Restriction of Use and any other amounts in respect of any RoU Direct Costs received by the Train Operator from Network Rail in respect of such Restriction of Use; or (ii) an overpayment by Network Rail to the Train Operator, the compensation to be paid by the Train Operator to Network Rail shall be the difference between the amount received by the Train Operator which was calculated under paragraph 4 and the RoU Direct Costs actually incurred by the Train Operator in respect of such Restriction of Use. (c) Network Rail shall include in the statement provided by it in respect of each Period under paragraph 13.1(a) details of the compensation agreed or determined under this paragraph 6 and paragraph 10 to be payable in respect of any Type 2 Restriction of Use taken in that Period and that compensation shall be due and payable by the relevant party to the other in accordance with paragraph 13.1.

  • Compensating Balance Arrangement The Funds and The Bank of New York have entered into a compensating balance arrangement, which would allow the Funds to compensate the Bank for any overdrafts by maintaining a positive cash balance the next day. Conversely, on any day the Funds maintain a positive balance, they will be allowed to overdraw the account as compensation. In both cases, Federal Reserve requirements, currently 10%, will be assessed. Therefore, all overdrafts must be compensated at 100% of the total and all positive balances will allow for an overdraft of 90% of the total. Balances for the tax-exempt portfolios will be permitted an open-ended roll forward. The taxable portfolios are closed out on a quarterly basis with no carry-over to the subsequent quarter. At the end of each quarter, the average overdraft will be assessed a fee of 1% above the actual Federal Funds rate at the end of the period. Any average positive balance will receive an earnings credit computed at the daily effective 90 day T-bill rate minus 0.25 bps on the last day of the period. Earnings credits will be offset against the Funds’ safekeeping fees. GLOBAL CUSTODY (Non-US Securities Processing) Global Safekeeping Fee Transaction Fee Countries *(in basis points)1 (U.S. Dollars)2 Argentina 17.00 55 Australia 1.50 25 Austria 3.00 40 Bahrain 50.00 140 Bangladesh 50.00 145 Belgium 2.50 35 Bermuda 17.00 70 Botswana 50.00 140 Brazil 12.00 30 Bulgaria 30.00 85 Canada 1.00 10 Chile 20.00 80 China “A” Shares 15.00 80 China “B” Shares 15.00 60 Colombia 50.00 95 Costa Rica 14.00 65 Croatia 25.00 70 Cyprus 15.00 35 Czech Republic 18.00 50 Denmark 2.00 35 Ecuador 30.00 55 Egypt 30.00 85 Estonia 10.00 60 Euromarket/Euroclear3 1.00 10 Euromarket/Clearstream 1.00 10 Finland 3.50 35 France 2.00 30 Germany 1.50 25 Ghana 50.00 140 Greece 9.00 40 Hong Kong 3.00 45 Hungary 20.00 55 Iceland 11.00 35 India 13.00 105 Indonesia 11.00 80 Ireland (Equities) 3.00 33 Ireland (Gov’t Bonds) 1.00 13 Israel 20.00 40 Italy 1.50 35 Ivory Coast 50.00 140 Jamaica 50.00 60 Japan 1.75 20 Jordan 50.00 140 Kazakhstan 53.00 140 Kenya 48.00 140 Latvia 50.00 45 Lebanon 50.00 140 Lithuania 20.00 43 Luxembourg 10.00 80 Malaysia 4.50 45 Malta 20.00 63 Mauritius 25.00 100 Mexico 6.50 30 Morocco 50.00 95 Namibia 50.00 60 Netherlands 2.00 25 New Zealand 2.00 35 Nigeria 50.00 60 Norway 2.50 35 Oman 50.00 140 Pakistan 50.00 140 Peru 50.00 83 Philippines 6.00 60 Poland 15.00 63 Portugal 5.00 50 Qatar 50.00 140 Romania 30.00 80 Russia Equities 40.00 95 Singapore 3.50 45 Slovak Republic 23.00 95 Slovenia 50.00 60 South Africa 2.50 30 South Korea 6.50 45 Spain 2.50 40 Sri Lanka 13.00 70 Swaziland 50.00 60 Sweden 2.00 30 Switzerland 2.00 35 Taiwan 10.00 60 Thailand 5.00 50 Trinidad & Tobago 50.00 53 Tunisia 50.00 53 Turkey 12.50 60 Ukraine 75.00 250 United Kingdom 0.50 10 Uruguay 75.00 83 Venezuela 50.00 140 Zambia 50.00 140 Zimbabwe 50.00 140 Not In Bank/Not in Custody Assets USA4………………………$500 per line per annum $70 per non-USD currency movement Brazil - 15 basis points for annual administrative charges Colombia - USD $600 per month minimum administration charge Ecuador - USD $800 monthly minimum per relationship Egypt - USD $400 monthly minimum per relationship Local taxes, stamp duties or other assessments, including stock exchange fees, postage and insurance for shipping, facsimile reporting, extraordinary telecommunications fees or other unusual expenses, which are unique to a country in which the Funds are investing This Amendment (the “Amendment”) dated as of November 8, 2007 between The Bank of New York (“Custodian”) and the Funds listed on Schedule II to the Custody Agreement, as amended by Exhibit A attached hereto (each a “Fund”).

  • Flexible Working Arrangements In accordance with the Employment Relations Act 2000, an employee affected by family violence may request a short-term (two months or less) variation of their employment arrangements to assist the employee to deal with the effects of family violence.

  • END USER AGREEMENTS (“EUA GAC acknowledges that the END USER may choose to enter into an End User Agreement (“EUA) with the Contractor through this Agreement, and that the term of the EUA may exceed the term of the current H-GAC Agreement. H-GAC’s acknowledgement is not an endorsement or approval of the End User Agreement’s terms and conditions. Contractor agrees not to offer, agree to or accept from the END USER, any terms or conditions that conflict with those in Contractor’s Agreement with H-GAC. Contractor affirms that termination of its Agreement with H-GAC for any reason shall not result in the termination of any underlying EUA, which shall in each instance, continue pursuant to the EUA’s stated terms and duration. Pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, termination of this Agreement will disallow the Contractor from entering into any new EUA with END USERS. Applicable H-GAC order processing charges will be due and payable to H-GAC