Common use of Public Benefit Clause in Contracts

Public Benefit. It is the Parties’ belief that the terms of this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public as set forth in California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 and California Administrative Code title 11, section 3201. As such, it is the intent of the Parties that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging that the Covered Product is somehow in violation of Proposition 65, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public, so long as HONG SAR is in material compliance with the terms of this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is the Parties’ belief that the terms of this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public as set forth in California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 and California Administrative Code title 11, section 3201. As such, it is the intent of the Parties that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging that the Covered Product is Products are somehow in violation of Proposition 65, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public, so long as HONG SAR POP is in material compliance with the terms of this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is the Parties’ belief that the terms of this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public as set forth in California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 and California Administrative Code title 11, section 3201. As such, it is the intent of the Parties that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging that the Covered Product is somehow in violation of Proposition 65, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public, so long as HONG SAR MYRTLE is in material compliance with the terms of this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is the Parties’ belief that the terms of this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public as set forth in California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 and California Administrative Code title 11, section 3201. As such, it is the intent of the Parties that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging that the Covered Product is Products are somehow in violation of Proposition 65, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public, public so long as HONG SAR Gemini is in material compliance with the terms of this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is the Parties’ belief that the terms of this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public as set forth in California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 and California Administrative Code title 11, section 3201. As such, it is the intent of the Parties that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging that the Covered Product is are somehow in violation of Proposition 65, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public, so long as HONG SAR Roxy is in material compliance with the terms of this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is the Parties’ belief that the terms of this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public as set forth in California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 and California Administrative Code title 11, section 3201. As such, it is the intent of the Parties that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging that the Covered Product is somehow in violation of Proposition 65, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public, so long as HONG SAR ZENB is in material compliance with the terms of this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is the Parties’ belief that the terms of this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public as set forth in California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 and California Administrative Code title 11, section 3201. As such, it is the intent of the Parties that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging that the Covered Product is somehow in violation of Proposition 65, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public, so long as HONG SAR SEMPIO is in material compliance with the terms of this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is the Parties’ belief that the terms of this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public as set forth in California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 and California Administrative Code title 11, section 3201. As such, it is the intent of the Parties that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging that the Covered Product is Products are somehow in violation of Proposition 65, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public, so long as HONG SAR DONGWON is in material compliance with the terms of this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is the Parties’ belief that the terms of this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public as set forth in California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 and California Administrative Code title 11, section 3201. As such, it is the intent of the Parties that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging that the Covered Product is Products are somehow in violation of Proposition 65, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public, public so long as HONG SAR PALDO is in material compliance with the terms of this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is the Parties’ belief that the terms of this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public as set forth in California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 and California Administrative Code title 11, section 3201. As such, it is the intent of the Parties that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging that the Covered Product is somehow in violation of Proposition 65, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public, so long as HONG SAR FORAGER is in material compliance with the terms of this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is the Parties’ belief that the terms of this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public as set forth in California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 and California Administrative Code title 11, section 3201. As such, it is the intent of the Parties that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging that the Covered Product is Products are somehow in violation of Proposition 65, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public, so long as HONG SAR DONGWON is in material compliance with the terms of this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is the Parties’ belief that the terms of this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public as set forth in California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 and California Administrative Code title 11, section 3201. As such, it is the intent of the Parties that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging that the Covered Product is somehow in violation of Proposition 65, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public, so long as HONG SAR SUFOO is in material compliance with the terms of this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is the Parties’ belief that the terms of this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public as set forth in California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 and California Administrative Code title 11, section 3201. As such, it is the intent of the Parties that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging that the Covered Product is are somehow in violation of Proposition 65, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public, public so long as HONG SAR Q’S BEST is in material compliance with the terms of this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is the Parties’ belief that the terms of this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public as set forth in California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 and California Administrative Code title 11, section 3201. As such, it is the intent of the Parties that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging that the Covered Product is Products are somehow in violation of Proposition 65, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public, so long as HONG SAR SEMPIO is in material compliance with the terms of this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is the Parties’ belief that the terms of this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public as set forth in California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 and California Administrative Code title 11, section 3201. As such, it is the intent of the Parties that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging that the Covered Product is are somehow in violation of Proposition 65, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public, so long as HONG SAR AFC is in material compliance with the terms of this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is the Parties’ belief that the terms of this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public as set forth in California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 and California Administrative Code title 11, section 3201. As such, it is the intent of the Parties that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging that the Covered Product is are somehow in violation of Proposition 65, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public, public so long as HONG SAR SPROUT is in material compliance with the terms of this Settlement Agreement.

Public Benefit. It is the Parties’ belief that the terms of this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public as set forth in California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 and California Administrative Code title 11, section 3201. As such, it is the intent of the Parties that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging that the Covered Product is Products are somehow in violation of Proposition 65, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public, so long as HONG SAR ROCKMAN is in material compliance with the terms of this Settlement Agreement.