Common use of Public Benefit Clause in Contracts

Public Benefit. It is ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇'s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Vitauthority under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Vitauthority's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Vitauthority is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Appears in 1 contract

Sources: Settlement Agreement

Public Benefit. It is ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇'s SalesVenue’s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Vitauthority SalesVenue under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ SalesVenue that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to VitauthoritySalesVenue's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Vitauthority SalesVenue is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Appears in 1 contract

Sources: Settlement Agreement

Public Benefit. It is ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇'s the Parties’ understanding that the commitments it Resideo has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Vitauthority Resideo under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the their intent of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to VitauthorityResideo's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to lead and lead compounds prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Vitauthority Resideo is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Appears in 1 contract

Sources: Settlement Agreement

Public Benefit. It is ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇'s Healthy Directions' understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Vitauthority Healthy Directions under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Healthy Directions that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Vitauthority's Healthy Directions' alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Vitauthority Healthy Directions is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Appears in 1 contract

Sources: Settlement Agreement

Public Benefit. It is ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇L-Nutra's understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Vitauthority L-Nutra under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ L-Nutra that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to VitauthorityL-Nutra's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Vitauthority L-Nutra is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Appears in 1 contract

Sources: Settlement Agreement

Public Benefit. It is ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇'s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Vitauthority Sunwarrior under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Sunwarrior that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Vitauthority▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇'s alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Vitauthority Sunwarrior is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Appears in 1 contract

Sources: Settlement Agreement

Public Benefit. It is ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇WBRPA's understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Vitauthority WBRPA under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ WBRPA that to the extent any other private party serves a notice notices and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to VitauthorityWBRPA's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Vitauthority WBRPA is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Appears in 1 contract

Sources: Settlement Agreement

Public Benefit. It is ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇'s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Vitauthority Happi Mi under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Happi Mi that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to VitauthorityHappi Mi 's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Vitauthority Happi Mi is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Appears in 1 contract

Sources: Settlement Agreement

Public Benefit. It is ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇'s the Parties’ understanding that the commitments it NuttZo has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Vitauthority NuttZo under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ the Parties that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to VitauthorityNuttZo's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Vitauthority NuttZo is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Appears in 1 contract

Sources: Settlement Agreement

Public Benefit. It is ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇Exaclair's understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Vitauthority Exaclair under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Exaclair that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to VitauthorityExaclair's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to lead prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Vitauthority Exaclair is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.

Appears in 1 contract

Sources: Settlement Agreement