Purpose of the Rules Clause Samples
Purpose of the Rules. The purpose of these rules is (1) to allocate responsibility among Developers and Transmission Owners and Load Serving Entities (“LSEs”), as described herein, for the cost of the new interconnection facilities that are required for the reliable interconnection of Projects to the New York State Transmission System and to the Distribution System in compliance with the requirements of the type of interconnection service elected by the Developer; and (2) allocate responsibility for the cost of interconnection facilities required for Capacity Resource Interconnection service (“▇▇▇▇”) and interconnection in compliance with the NYISO Deliverability Interconnection Standard. Section 25.6 of this Attachment S describes the rules to estimate and allocate responsibility for the cost of the interconnection facilities required for Energy Resource Interconnection Service (“ERIS”) and interconnection in compliance with the NYISO Minimum Interconnection Standard. Section 25.7 of this Attachment S describes the rules to estimate and allocate responsibility for the cost of interconnection facilities required for ▇▇▇▇ and interconnection in compliance with the NYISO Deliverability Interconnection Standard. Every Developer is responsible for the cost of the new interconnection facilities required for the reliable interconnection of its Project in compliance with the NYISO Minimum Interconnection Standard, as that responsibility is determined by these rules. In addition, every Developer electing ▇▇▇▇ is also responsible for the cost of the interconnection facilities required pursuant to the NYISO Deliverability Interconnection Standard, as that responsibility is determined by these rules. The rules in this Attachment S to the ISO OATT cover (i) Large Facilities greater than 20 MW subject to the Large Facility Interconnection Procedures set out in Attachment X to the ISO OATT (“LFIP”), (ii) Small Generating Facilities no larger than 20 MW subject to the Small Generator Interconnection Procedures set out in Attachment Z to the ISO OATT (“SGIP”) that are required to enter a Class Year Study pursuant to Section 32.3.5.3.2 of the SGIP, and facilities greater than 2 MW that seek to obtain or increase ▇▇▇▇ beyond the levels permitted by this Attachment S, Section 30.3.2.6 of the LFIP and Section 32.4.11.1 of the SGIP, as applicable (each a “Project” and collectively, “Projects” for purposes of this Attachment S). As described herein, the intent is that each Developer be held responsi...
Purpose of the Rules. The Rules’ purpose is to enable parties involved in a dispute to reach a just, speedy, and cost-effective determination of it, taking into account the values that distinguish arbitration from litigation.
Purpose of the Rules. The purpose of these rules is (1) to allocate responsibility among Developers and Transmission Owners and Load Serving Entities (“LSEs”), as described herein, for the cost of the new interconnection facilities that are required for the reliable interconnection of generation projects and Class Year Transmission Projects to the New York State Transmission System and to the Distribution System in compliance with the requirements of the type of interconnection service elected by the project Developer; and (2) allocate responsibility for the cost of interconnection facilities required for Capacity Resource Interconnection service (“▇▇▇▇”) and interconnection in compliance with the NYISO Deliverability Interconnection Standard.
Purpose of the Rules. The purpose of the Rules is to avoid potentially destabilizing market conditions arising from an overconcentrationof futures/options position accumulated by a single person or group of persons acting in concert, and to increase market transparency. Some of the major requirements of the Rules and Guidance Note are summarized below. However, you should review the Rules and Guidance Note in their entirety, and consult with your legal counsel in order to ensure that you have a full understanding of your obligations in connection with trading in Hong Kong. Please note that the Rules make you responsible for ensuring that you comply with the Rules. Section 8 of the Rules makes it a criminal offence not to comply (subject to a maximum fine of HK$100,000 and imprisonment for up to 2 years). You may not hold or control futures contracts or stock options contracts in excess of the prescribed limit, unless you have obtained the prior authorization of the Hong Kong regulators. For example, the prescribed limit for Hang Seng Index futures and options contracts and Mini-Hang Seng Index futures and options contract is 10,000 long or short position delta limit for all contract months combined, provided the position delta for the Mini-Hang Seng Index futures contracts or Mini-Hang Seng Index options contracts shall not at any time exceed 2,000 long or short for all contact months combined. For many futures contracts and stock options contracts, the position limit is set at 5,000 contracts for any one contract/expiry month. The prescribed limit for each contract traded on the Hong Kong exchanges is set out in the Rules.
Purpose of the Rules. The Family Law (Scotland) Act 1985 aims to provide a detailed structure within which the courts must operate in determining what financial provision to make when spouses or civil partners dissolve their legal relationship and have been unable to agree themselves as to the division of their property. Though designed to be far less discretionary than the pre-1985 law, a certain level of discretion clearly still rests with the court - for example in determining a ‘fair’ sharing of ‘matrimonial/partnership property’ under s 9(1)(a), in assessing contributions and disadvantages under s 9(1)(b) and taking ‘fair account’ of them, and making a ‘reasonable’ provision either for adjusting to loss of support under s 9(1)(d) or for ameliorating serious financial hardship under s 9(1)(e). But the Act does provide a structure within which all courts can operate to produce a result that is (to some extent at least) predictable. Predictability of judicial outcome is believed to encourage extra-judicial settlement, an important social aim of the law. Another major aim of the Scottish legislation on financial provision on divorce/dissolution is to encourage the court to design a settlement that ensures a ‘clean break’ between the parties. The primary order that the court can make is one for the payment of a lump sum or for the transfer of property from one ex-spouse to the other: in other words, a once and for all financial settlement, after which the parties are to be free of obligation towards - and free of dependency on - each other. The two most valuable assets (the family home and the pensions) are normally dealt with through a one-off payment, for the principles contained in s 9(1)(a) and (b), which are the primary means of dealing with these assets, allow for the making only of an order for the payment of a capital sum or for the transfer of property or for a pension sharing order. Principles 9(1)(c) and (d), which tend to be supplementary to the primary 51 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ v ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 1995 SC 321.