Pursuant to Md Clause Samples

Pursuant to Md. GENERAL CORPORATION LAW SS. 3-113(a), the effective date of this Plan and the Merger (the "Effective Date") shall be either (a) the first day of the month following the month in which the last of the events in Section 2, Section 7, and Section 8 occurs; or (b) such other date as Talbot Bancshares and Shore Bancshares may agree upon. Talbot Bancshares and Shore Bancshares will prepare and execute Articles of Merger in substantially the form attached as Appendix II which will set forth the Effective Date, and will file the Articles of Merger with the Maryland State Department of Assessments and Taxation.
Pursuant to Md. Education Code ▇▇▇. § 24-1203, JHPD police officers must wear and use body worn cameras. Both agencies agree to grant the other access to its body-worn camera (BWC) system for assistance in investigating any criminal or administrative matter. Each agency shall bear the costs and expenses of its own body worn camera program. The JHPD will ensure that their body worn camera program is compatible with BPD’s program, including but not limited to ensuring the protection of confidential, sensitive or private data as required under BPD’s body worn camera policy.
Pursuant to Md. Education Code ▇▇▇. §6-113.2 (Code), a contractor of a Board of Education who provides a service to a school or the students of a school shall meet the requirements set forth for screening its employees assigned to work at a school site to determine whether such employees have a history of child sexual abuse and/or sexual misconduct. The Vendor shall be solely responsible for completing the screening set forth in the Code, shall maintain records of employee screenings, and shall make such records available to PGCPS upon request.
Pursuant to Md. Code ▇▇▇., Financial Institutions Article ("Fl"), §2-l 14(a)(l) and (2), the Commissioner Of Financial Regulation (the "Commissioner") is authorized to make public or private investigations as the Commissioner considers necessary to determine whether a person has violated a provision of law, regulation, rnle or .order over which the Commissioner has jurisdiction; or aid in the enforcement ofa law or in the prescribing ofregulations, rules, and orders over which the Commissioner has jurisdiction.
Pursuant to Md. Code, Real. Prop. § 8-212.4, Tenant(s) will be billed by the Landlord for allocated utility services. “Utilities” that can be collected under the ratio utility billing system (RUBS) include gas usage, electricity, wastewater sewage disposal services usage and water consumption/usage. The allocated utility services the Tenant(s) will be billed under RUBS include:
Pursuant to Md. Code ▇▇▇., State Government § 9-20B-11, a person may not knowingly make or cause to be made any false statement or report in any document required to be furnished by MEA in relation to a SEIF-funded Grant.. Any violation of this provision is a misdemeanor and on conviction is subject to a fine not exceeding $50,000.00 or imprisonment not exceeding 1 year or both ().
Pursuant to Md. GENERAL CORPORATION LAW SS. 3-113(a), MD. FIN. INS. CODE SS. 3-709(b), and DE. GENERAL CORPORATION LAW SS. 252(c), the effective date of this Plan and the Mergers (the "Effective Date") shall be eitheR (a) the first day of the month following the month in which the last of the events in Section 2, Section 7 and Section 8 occurs; or (b) such other date as Columbia Bancorp and Suburban Bancshares may agree upon. Columbia Bancorp and Suburban Bancshares will prepare and execute an Agreement and Articles of Merger in substantially the form attached as Appendix II which will set forth the Effective Date, and will file the Agreement and Articles of Merger with the Maryland State Department of Assessments and Taxation and the Delaware Secretary of State. Columbia Bank and Suburban Bank will prepare and execute an Agreement of Bank Merger in substantially the form attached as Appendix II, and will file the Agreement of Bank Merger and the Certificate of Merger of the Commissioner of Financial Institutions which will set forth the Effective Date with the Maryland State Department of Assessments and Taxation.

Related to Pursuant to Md

  • Pursuant to M S. 43A.27, Subdivision 3a(1), an employee who separates or retires from State service and who, at the time of separation has five (5) or more years of allowable pension service and is entitled to immediately receive an annuity under a State retirement program and, who is not eligible for regular (non-disability) Medicare coverage, may continue to participate in the health and dental coverages offered through the Group Insurance Program. Consistent with M.S. 43A.27, Subdivision 3a(2), an employee who separates or retires from State service and who, at the time of separation is at least fifty (50) years of age and at least fifteen (15) years of State service may continue to participate in the health and dental coverages offered through the Group Insurance Program. Retiree coverage must be coordinated with Medicare.

  • Pursuant to Minn Stat. § 16C.145, the Contractor must comply with the following nonvisual technology access standards to the extent required by law: • That the effective interactive control and use of the technology, including the operating system applications programs, prompts, and format of the data presented, are readily achievable by nonvisual means; • That the nonvisual access technology must be compatible with information technology used by other individuals with whom the blind or visually impaired individual must interact; • That nonvisual access technology must be integrated into networks used to share communications among employees, program participants, and the public; and • That the nonvisual access technology must have the capability of providing equivalent access by nonvisual means to telecommunications or other interconnected network services used by persons who are not blind or visually impaired; and • Executive branch state agencies subject to Section 16E.03, subdivision 9, are not required to include nonvisual technology access standards developed under this Section in contracts for the procurement of information technology. These standards do not require the installation of software or peripheral devices used for nonvisual access when the information technology is being used by individuals who are not blind or visually impaired.

  • Pursuant to G S. 143-59.2(b), the undersigned hereby certifies that none of the Contractor’s officers, directors, or owners (if the Contractor is an unincorporated business entity) has been convicted of any violation of Chapter 78A of the General Statutes or the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 within 10 years immediately prior to the date of the bid solicitation.

  • Pursuant to Fed R. CIV. P. 23(e), the Court finds that the Settlement embodied in the Settlement Agreement is fair, reasonable, and adequate to the Plan and the Settlement Class, and more particularly finds that: a. The Settlement was negotiated vigorously and at arm’s-length, under the auspices of an experienced, neutral mediator, by Defense Counsel on the one hand, and by Class Counsel on behalf of the Class Representatives and the Settlement Class, on the other hand; b. Class Representatives and Defendants had sufficient information to evaluate the settlement value of the Class Action; c. If the Settlement had not been achieved, Class Representatives and the Settlement Class faced the expense, risk, and uncertainty of extended litigation; d. The amount of the Settlement— fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000.00)—is fair, reasonable, and adequate, taking into account the costs, risks, and delay of trial and appeal. The method of distributing the Settlement Fund is efficient and requires no filing of claims for participants, Beneficiaries, and Alternate Payees with Active Accounts, and requires only a modest Former Participant Claim Form for Former Participants, Beneficiaries, and Alternate Payees without Active Accounts. The Settlement terms related to attorneys’ fees and expenses, and case contribution awards to Class Representatives, do not raise any questions concerning fairness of the Settlement, and there are no agreements, apart from the Settlement, required to be considered under FED. R. CIV. P. 23(e)(2)(C)(iv). The Settlement Amount is within the range of settlement values obtained in similar cases; e. At all times, the Class Representatives and Class Counsel have acted independently of Defendants and in the interest of the Settlement Class; and f. The Court has duly considered and overruled any filed objection(s) to the Settlement to the extent there were any.

  • Pursuant to S B. 1368 of the 83rd Texas Legislature, Regular Session, Vendor is required to make any information created or exchanged with the State pursuant to this Contract, and not otherwise excepted from disclosure under the Texas Public Information Act, available in a format that is accessible by the public at no additional charge to the State.