Qualitative Data Analysis Clause Samples

Qualitative Data Analysis. The qualitative data from the key informant interviews did not merit systematic analysis due to lack of depth. This was not due to poor data collection but the nature of the domains. Nine of the 16 key informant interviews were utilized for the history and description of the program. They included six senior and junior staff persons, a leader within the local Ministry of Health, and two community leaders, one who had also been a community health volunteer. Only the domains of history, CSRA today, lessons learned and best practices were analyzed for this paper.
Qualitative Data Analysis. As is typical in qualitative research, data collection and data analysis happen simultaneously (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, 2011). Analysis of the key informant interviews used a modified grounded theory approach. Grounded theory is considered a circular process in which researchers systematically revisit data and observations to create a framework for the processes or experiences (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, 2011). In this case, we used emergent themes from the transcripts to describe the attitudes and perspectives presented about barriers to accessing abortion and develop concepts to explore further in the surveys. We read five of the transcripts and conducted preliminary coding before developing a codebook and standard definitions for each code. We then re-read and, when necessary, re-coded each transcript to ensure standardization. We did all coding and analysis in Spanish and the quotes used to present results are translated into English (see appendix C for list of translated and Spanish quotes). We first coded the transcripts using deductive codes based on the research question and interview guide. Some examples of deductive codes are: financial barriers referring to any cost or price of services that delay or prevent women in accessing an abortion, religion, referring to descriptions of beliefs or fears about spiritual rules regarding abortion. Several distinct and unexpected themes emerged from the interviews and we developed these into inductive codes. Examples of these include: medical training, referring to descriptions of curricula or coursework in medical schools that facilitated, prevented or otherwise affected provision of quality abortion services, and conscientious objection “no debido” or “that should not be done,” referring to doctors that conscientiously objected to provision of abortion in a manner inconsistent with the legal boundaries for conscientious objection.
Qualitative Data Analysis. A Methods of Sourcebook. Singapore: Sage Publications Inc
Qualitative Data Analysis. An Introduction. 2nd edition. London: Sage. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ed. 2018.
Qualitative Data Analysis. An Expanded Sourcebook. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇: Sage Publications. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In ▇. ▇. ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, S. (Ed.), Social Representations.
Qualitative Data Analysis. The analysis is done using MaxQda 11. Key patterns and themes emerging from the transcripts were identified by memoing the data. In addition to this, inductive codes pertaining to the research question, identified during the literature review and the data collection were applied to the data to fully answer the research question. The 4 codes used are: • Knowledge: Any reference to the participant’s knowledge/information regarding the etiology and effects of undernutrition in their children. This also included the participants knowledge of signs/symptoms associated with malnutrition. Sources of such an information, for example, Anganwadi worker, Family, Self etc. was also include in this coding category. Participant’s knowledge of IYCF practices i.e. how / when / what needs to be done in their community were also included in this coding category such as “Do you know when to start introducing complementary foods to your child?” In accordance to the variety of responses in this coding category, it was sub-coded into: • Attitudes Any reference to how the participants feel about children’s nutrition and feeding. This could include a stance, belief, or mode of behaving. Also includes a settled manner of thinking, feeling or behaving which reflects their state of mind or disposition and has the potential to predict behavior. The category stands synonymous with the participant’s perspective, outlook, inclination, approach, temper or reactions. For example, “Do you feel you get enough information from the Anganwadi worker?” The discussion was facilitated using the photographs collected from the participants. This coding category is sub-coded into Opinions, Perceived Barriers and Perceived importance of nutrition recommendations depending on the participants’ views and description of the pictures.
Qualitative Data Analysis. ‌ To begin the data analysis process, the evaluator listened to interview recordings of seven interviews that occurred either in-person or by phone and identifying important themes and information mentioned by each respondent. Each interview was designed to last no more than 30 minutes. The interviews were coded according to the textual analysis technique based in grounded theory, outlined by ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, and ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ in Qualitative Research Methods (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇, & ▇▇▇▇▇▇, 2011). The themes and information noted were organized under common or overarching themes and also organized according to which evaluation question they responded. A codebook was created and included these themes and their operational definitions. These codes included themes like “relationships” and “experience”. Other primary themes noted during interviews were from the “advice” code, the “needs and barriers”, “outcomes”, “timing”, and “future directions” (Appendix E). Upon organizing this information, results and recommendations were created for the program. Ethics‌ Participant consent was obtained to interview and record them during the interview. After qualitative data analysis, the interview recordings were permanently deleted. Approval by the Emory Institutional Review Board (IRB) was not required because this evaluation was considered program quality improvement (Appendix F).

Related to Qualitative Data Analysis

  • Quantitative Analysis Quantitative analysts develop and apply financial models designed to enable equity portfolio managers and fundamental analysts to screen potential and current investments, assess relative risk and enhance performance relative to benchmarks and peers. To the extent that such services are to be provided with respect to any Account which is a registered investment company, Categories 3, 4 and 5 above shall be treated as “investment advisory services” for purposes of Section 5(b) of the Agreement.”

  • Risk Analysis The Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis with respect to Securities Depositories operating in the countries listed in Appendix B. If the Custodian is unable to provide a Risk Analysis with respect to a particular Securities Depository, it will notify the Fund. If a new Securities Depository commences operation in one of the Appendix B countries, the Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis in a reasonably practicable time after such Securities Depository becomes operational. If a new country is added to Appendix B, the Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis with respect to each Securities Depository in that country within a reasonably practicable time after the addition of the country to Appendix B.

  • Data Quality 4.1 Each party ensures that the shared Personal Data is accurate. 4.2 Parties will notify each other with undue delay if they become aware of inaccuracies in shared Personal Data.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • Sampling and Analysis The sampling and analysis of the coal delivered hereunder shall be performed by Buyer upon delivery of the coal to Buyer’s facility, and the results thereof shall be accepted and used as defining the quality and characteristics of the coal delivered under this Agreement and as the Payment Analysis. All analyses shall be made in Buyer’s laboratory at Buyer’s expense in accordance with ASTM standards where applicable, or industry-accepted standards in other cases. Samples for analyses shall be taken in accordance with ASTM standards or other methods mutually acceptable to both parties. Seller shall transmit its “as loaded” quality analysis to Buyer as soon as possible. Seller’s “as-loaded” quality shall be the Payment Analysis only when Buyer’s sampler and/or scales are inoperable, or if Buyer fails to obtain a sample upon unloading. Seller represents that it is familiar with Buyer’s sampling and analysis practices, and that it finds them to be acceptable. Buyer shall notify Seller in writing of any significant changes in Buyer’s sampling and analysis practices. Any such changes in Buyer’s sampling and analysis practices shall, except for ASTM or industry-accepted changes in practices, provide for no less accuracy than the sampling and analysis practices existing at the tune of the execution of this Agreement, unless the Parties otherwise mutually agree. Each sample taken by Buyer shall be divided into four (4) parts and put into airtight containers, properly labeled and sealed. One (1) part shall be used for analysis by Buyer. One (1) part shall be used by Buyer as a check sample, if Buyer in its sole judgment determines it is necessary. One (1) part shall be retained by Buyer until thirty (30) days after the sample is taken (“Disposal Date”), and shall be delivered to Seller for analysis if Seller so requests before the Disposal Date. One (1) part (the “Referee Sample”) shall be retained by Buyer until the Disposal Date. Seller shall be given copies of all analyses made by Buyer by the fifth (5th) business day of the month following the month of unloading. In addition, Buyer shall send Seller weekly analyses of coal unloaded at Buyer’s facilities. Seller, on reasonable notice to Buyer, shall have the right to have a representative present to observe the sampling and analyses performed by Buyer. Unless Seller requests an analysis of the Referee Sample before the Disposal Date, Buyer’s analysis shall be used to determine the quality of the coal delivered hereunder and shall be the Payment Analysis. The Monthly Weighted Averages of specifications referenced in §6.1 shall be based on the individual Shipment analyses. If any dispute arises with regard to the analysis of any sample before the Disposal Date for such sample, the Referee Sample retained by Buyer shall be submitted for analysis to an independent commercial testing laboratory (“Independent Lab”) mutually chosen by Buyer and Seller. For each coal quality specification in question, if the analysis of the Independent Lab differs by more than the applicable ASTM reproducibility standards, the Independent Lab results will govern, and the prior analysis shall be disregarded. All testing of the Referee Sample by the Independent Lab shall be at requestor’s expense unless the Independent Lab results differ from the original Payment Analysis for any specification by more than the applicable ASTM reproducibility standards as to that specification. In such case, the cost of the analysis made by the Independent Lab shall be borne by the party who provided the original Payment Analysis.