Reasonable Limit Clause Samples

A Reasonable Limit clause sets a boundary on the extent of obligations, liabilities, or actions required under a contract, ensuring that such requirements are not excessive or impractical. In practice, this clause might cap the amount of damages a party can claim, restrict the scope of indemnification, or limit the duration of certain responsibilities to what is considered reasonable under the circumstances. Its core function is to prevent parties from being exposed to disproportionate or unforeseeable burdens, thereby promoting fairness and predictability in contractual relationships.
Reasonable Limit. The parties hereto have attempted to set forth certain restrictions only to the extent necessary to protect the interests of the Company. Each of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and the TPG Group expressly acknowledges that the restrictive covenant contained in subsection 2(a) above along with the exceptions thereto contained in subsections 2(b) and 2(c) above, constitutes a reasonable restriction. If, however, the scope or enforceability of the restrictive covenant contained in this Agreement is disputed at any time, a court or other trier of fact may modify and enforce the covenant to the extent that it believes is reasonable under the circumstances existing at the time.
Reasonable Limit. The parties have attempted to limit the Employee’s ability and right to compete only to the extent necessary to protect the Corporation from unfair competition. If, however, the scope or enforceability of the restrictive covenants contained in this Agreement are in any way disputed at any time, a court or other trier of fact may modify and enforce the covenants to the extent that it believes is reasonable under the circumstances existing at that time.
Reasonable Limit. The Company and the Trustee have attempted to limit the Trustee's right to compete only to the extent necessary to protect the Company and the Operating Subsidiaries from unfair competition. The Trustee expressly acknowledges that the restrictive covenant contained in Section 1 above, along with the exceptions thereto contained in Section 2 above, constitute a reasonable restriction. If, however, the scope or enforceability of the restrictive covenant contained in this Agreement is disputed at any time, a court or other trier of fact may modify and enforce the covenant to the extent that it believes is reasonable under the circumstances existing at that time.
Reasonable Limit. The parties have attempted to limit Employee's rights to compete only to the extent necessary to protect HPII from unfair competition. If, however, the geographic scope, time duration or enforceability of the restrictive covenant contained in this Agreement is disputed at any time, a court or other trier of fact shall modify and enforce the covenant to the maximum extent reasonable under the circumstances then existing.
Reasonable Limit. The Company and the Executive have attempted to limit the Executive's right to compete only to the extent necessary to protect the Company and its subsidiaries from unfair competition. The Executive expressly acknowledges that the restrictive provisions of this Agreement constitute reasonable restrictions. If, however, the scope or enforceability of the restrictive provisions contained in this Agreement is disputed at any time, a court or other trier of fact may modify and enforce the covenant to the extent that it believes is reasonable under the circumstances existing at that time.
Reasonable Limit. The parties hereto have attempted to set forth certain restrictions only to the extent necessary to protect the interests of the Company. Each of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and the TPG Group expressly acknowledges that the restrictive covenant contained in subsection 2(a) above along with the exceptions thereto contained in subsections 2(b) and 2(c) above, constitutes

Related to Reasonable Limit

  • Reasonable Overtime (a) There is a requirement to work reasonable overtime. Subject to that requirement being met, it is not compulsory for an Employee to work overtime in a particular case. (b) On jobs where overtime is necessary, the work crew may be rostered so that each Employee is not disadvantaged as to the amount of overtime worked (subject to the Employer being able to maintain appropriate levels of coverage as required to meet operational needs). On any day that overtime is worked there will be no necessity for all Employees on that particular job to work. (c) Excessive overtime shall not be worked. It is agreed that every effort shall be made to eliminate excessive overtime and create as many employment opportunities as possible. Any suggested and agreed measures to address this shall be discussed by the persons covered by this Agreement and reviewed regularly on all projects throughout the life of this Agreement.

  • Requirement to Work Reasonable Overtime The Employer may require any Employee to work reasonable overtime at overtime rates and such an Employee shall work overtime in accordance with the requirement.

  • Reasonable Suspicion a. Reasonable suspicion to test a Covered Employees for illegal drugs or alcohol will exist when specific, reliable objective facts and circumstances would create a good faith belief in a prudent person that the employee has used a drug or alcohol. Such circumstances include, but are not limited to, the employee’s behavior or appearance while on any SFMTA jobsite, while on SFMTA business or in SFMTA facilities, and recognized and accepted symptoms of intoxication or impairment caused by drugs or alcohol, that are not reasonably explained by other causes such as fatigue, lack of sleep, proper use of prescription drugs, or reaction to noxious fumes or smoke. b. Any individual or employee can report an employee who may be under the influence of alcohol or drugs. Upon receiving a report of possible alcohol or illegal drugs on the job, two (2) trained employer representatives will verify and document the basis for the suspicion and request testing. The first employer representative shall verify and document the employee’s appearance and behavior based on the above-stated indicators and, if appropriate, recommend testing to the second employer representative. At work locations within the border of the City and County of San Francisco (including San Francisco International Airport), the second employer representative shall verify and document the appearance and behavior of the employee based on the above-stated indicators and has final authority to require the employee to be tested. At work locations outside the border of the City and County of San Francisco, the second employer representative shall confer with the first employer representative to verify the employee’s behavior based on the above- stated indicators, and the second employer representative has the final authority to require the employee to be tested. In the event only one trained employer representative is available onsite, the representative shall confer with any other trained employer representative within the City to verify the employee’s behavior. The second trained employer representative shall have the final authority to require the employee to be tested. c. If the SFMTA requires an employee to be tested under reasonable suspicion, then the employee may ask for representation. Representation may include, but is not limited to, union representatives and shop stewards. If the employee requests representation, the SFMTA may allow a reasonable amount (a maximum of one hour) of time for the employee to obtain representation. Such request shall not delay the administration of the tests for more than one hour from the time the employee is notified that the employee will be tested. d. Moreover, if the SFMTA has reasonable suspicion or suspect that a prescription medication may have interfered with or may have had a direct impact on an employee’s job performance, it may require that employee to be tested. e. The department representative(s) shall be required to accurately document and file the incident and the employee shall be required to complete a consent form prior to any testing. If an employee refuses to Submit to testing, then the SFMTA shall treat the refusal as having tested positive and shall immediately take appropriate disciplinary action pursuant to the attached discipline matrix. f. The SFMTA shall bear the costs for any required testing for alcohol and/or drugs under this section. Any counseling and rehabilitation services shall be on the employee’s time and at the employee’s cost, except that employees may use accrued paid time off to attend treatment and may utilize any resources covered by insurance. Employees shall have the right to use any accrued but unused leave balances while enrolled in any counseling or rehabilitation program. Any request by an employee to re-test a specimen shall be at the employee’s cost.

  • Reasonable Access If any review or evaluation is made on the premises of the Engineer or a subprovider, the Engineer shall provide and require its subproviders to provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of the state or federal representatives in the performance of their duties.

  • Reasonable Consent Whenever a Party’s consent or permission is required under this CRADA, its consent or permission will not be unreasonably withheld.