Request for Comments Clause Samples

Request for Comments. (a) Specific request for comments on the traditional annual PRA hourly burden and cost.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Request for Comments. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized or included in the request for OMB approval of this information collection. They will also become a matter of public record. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) The accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden (including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information; (c) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, e.g., the use of automated AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD. ACTION: Notice; correction.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Request for Comments. The FDIC is interested in receiving comments on all aspects of the proposed rule. In particular, do the amendments to the definitions of “qualifying master netting agreement,” “collateral agreement,” “repo-style transaction,” and “eligible margin loan” ensure that the regulatory capital and liquidity treatment of OTC derivatives, repo-style transactions, eligible margin loans and other collateralized transactions is unaffected by the ISDA Protocol and the BRRD? Is there any reason why the FDIC should not revise the above mentioned definitions? The ISDA Protocol also provides for limited stays of termination rights for cross-defaults resulting from affiliate insolvency proceedings under a limited number of U.S. general insolvency regimes, including the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.25 The proposed rule does not address this portion of the ISDA Protocol because this portion of the ISDA Protocol does not take effect on January 1, 2015. Instead it takes effect upon the effective date of implementing regulations in the United States. The FDIC requests comment on whether the definitions of “qualifying master 25 Under the ISDA Protocol, upon commencement of such proceedings, adhering counterparties would be subject to a limited stay of their termination rights and other remedies. The limited stay does not apply if a direct counterparty is subject to general insolvency proceedings. The stay also does not apply to payment or delivery defaults or to defaults that are not directly or indirectly related to the affiliate insolvency proceedings. netting agreement,” “collateral agreement,” “repo-style transaction,” and “eligible margin loan” should also be amended to recognize the stay of default rights in this context. Question 1: The proposed rule would prevent an increase in regulatory capital by allowing a “qualifying master netting agreement” to include stays that may be imposed by the laws of a foreign jurisdiction as a result of the receivership, conservatorship, or resolution of a foreign financial entity. Given the recent introduction of stays through contracts under the ISDA protocol, as well as in foreign jurisdictions, the FDIC seeks comment on the appropriateness of the proposed rule’s effect on regulatory capital. Question 2: What was the effectiveness of netting agreements during the financial Question 3: How were cross-border netting agreements treated by U.S. and foreign Question 4: What legal and operational impediments to netting exist today? Question 5: Does n...
View Source
Request for Comments. Although comments may address any part or provision of the template, FHWA is specifically requesting comments on the following: • Whether revisions are needed to the template to delete standard terms requiring approval by the Secretary of the policies, procedures, processes, or manuals of the States, or other State actions, if Federal law (including regulations) does not specifically require an approval. The FHWA encourages commenters to specify each provision that should be revised. • Opportunities to modify the template to allow adjustments to the review schedules for State practices or actions, including through risk-based approaches, program reviews, process reviews, or other means. • Provisions of the template that describe how FHWA will perform oversight under 23 U.S.C. 106 (g), such as reviewing State DOT practices or actions through risk- based approaches, program reviews, process reviews, or other means. The FHWA is interested in how commenters believe FHWA could improve these provisions in the template. • Whether FHWA should allow the template to be modified by individual division offices and State DOTs to include State-specific provisions that do not otherwise conflict with the template and, if so, examples of what might be included in those provisions. The FHWA is particularly interested in whether commenters believe FHWA should allow the addition of such State-specific provisions under Section
View Source
Request for Comments. Written comments and/or suggestions from the public and affected agencies should address one or more of the following points:
View Source
Request for Comments. The Service solicits comments and suggestions relating to this revenue procedure. In particular, the Service requests (1) comments on the correction methods, earnings adjustment methods, and examples described in this revenue procedure, (2) suggestions for alternative methods of correction for the Operational Failures addressed in this revenue procedure, and (3) suggestions for methods of correction for Qualification Failures not addressed in this revenue procedure (including methods for correcting failures with respect to 403(b) plans). It is requested that comments and suggestions be submitted by November 21, 1999, addressed to CC:DOM:CORP:R (Rev. Proc. 99-31), Room 5228, Internal Revenue Service, POB 7604, ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Station, Washington, DC 20044. In the alternative, comments may be hand-delivered between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. to CC:DOM:CORP:R (Rev. Proc. 99-31), ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s Desk, Internal Revenue Service, ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇. Alternatively, taxpayers may transmit comments electronically by using the following site: ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇
View Source
Request for Comments. 2119’, ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Harvard University, March 1997: ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/rfc/rfc2119.txt 1. General Information‌‌‌‌
View Source

Related to Request for Comments

  • Request for Waiver A. Prior to submission of a request for a partial or total waiver, Bidder/Contractor shall speak to the Designated Contacts of the OGS Office of Minority- and Women-Owned Business Enterprises for guidance. B. In accordance with 5 NYCRR § 142.7, a Bidder/Contractor who is able to document good faith efforts to meet the goal requirements, as set forth in clause VII below, may submit a request for a partial or total waiver on Form BDC 333, accompanied by supporting documentation. A Bidder may submit the request for waiver at the same time it submits its MWBE Utilization Plan. If a request for waiver is submitted with the MWBE Utilization Plan and is not accepted by OGS at that time, the provisions of clauses V(C), (D) & (E) will apply. If the documentation included with the Bidder’s/Contractor’s waiver request is complete, OGS shall evaluate the request and issue a written notice of acceptance or denial within twenty (20) business days of receipt. C. Contractor shall attempt to utilize, in good faith, any MBE or WBE identified within its MWBE Utilization Plan, during the performance of the Contract. Requests for a partial or total waiver of established goal requirements made subsequent to Contract award may be made at any time during the term of the Contract to OGS, but must be made no later than prior to the submission of a request for final payment on the Contract. D. If OGS, upon review of the MWBE Utilization Plan and Monthly MWBE Contractor Compliance Reports determines that Contractor is failing or refusing to comply with the contract goals and no waiver has been issued in regards to such non-compliance, OGS may issue a notice of deficiency to the Contractor. The Contractor must respond to the notice of deficiency within seven (7) business days of receipt. Such response may include a request for partial or total waiver of MWBE contract goals.

  • Request for Proposals A State request inviting proposals for Goods or Services. This Contract shall be governed by the statutes, regulations and procedures of the State of Connecticut, Department of Administrative Services.

  • Request for Review If any operator believes that in his case any requirment of a recognized agency is excessive, the operator may request the administrator, division of forestry, to review the requirements. If in the opinion of the administrator any or all are not necessary in the interest of public safety, he may make such changes as he considers advisable. Bucket: Metal, plastic, canvas, or fiberglass container capable of holding at least one gallon of water. Motorcycle helmets qualify. Campfire means a fire set for cooking, warming, or ceremonial purposes; not more than 3 feet in diameter or height; void of overhanging branches; with all combustible material cleared at least 1-1/2 times the diameter of the fire; or a barbecue in a noncombustible container.

  • Request for Consent If Tenant seeks to make a Transfer, Tenant shall notify Landlord, in writing, and deliver to Landlord at least thirty (30) days (but not more than one hundred eighty (180) days) prior to the proposed commencement date of the Transfer (the “Proposed Effective Date”) the following information and documents (the “Tenant’s Notice”): (i) a description of the portion of the Premises to be transferred (the “Subject Space”); (ii) all of the terms of the proposed Transfer including without limitation, the Proposed Effective Date, the name and address of the proposed Transferee, and a copy of the existing or proposed assignment, sublease or other agreement governing the proposed Transfer; (iii) current financial statements of the proposed Transferee certified by an officer, member, partner or owner thereof, and any such other information as Landlord may then reasonably require, including without limitation, audited financial statements for the previous three (3) most recent consecutive fiscal years; (iv) the Transfer Plans and Specifications (defined below), if any; and (v) such other information as Landlord may then reasonably require. Tenant shall give Landlord the Tenant’s Notice by registered or certified mail addressed to Landlord at Landlord’s Address specified in the Basic Provisions. Within fifteen (15) business days after Landlord’s receipt of the Tenant’s Notice (the “Landlord Response Period”) Landlord shall notify Tenant, in writing, of its determination with respect to such requested proposed Transfer and the election to recapture as set forth below. If Landlord does not elect to recapture pursuant to the provisions hereof and Landlord does consent to the requested proposed Transfer, Tenant may thereafter assign its interests in and to this Lease or sublease all or a portion of the Premises to the same party and on the same terms as set forth in the Tenant’s Notice. If Landlord fails to respond to Tenant’s Notice within Landlord’s Response Period, then, after Tenant delivers to Landlord fifteen (15) business days written notice (the “Second Response Period”) and Landlord fails to respond thereto prior to the end of the Second Response Period, the proposed Transfer shall then be deemed approved by Landlord.

  • Request for Hearing The employee must file a written request for hearing within fifteen calendar days of receipt of the Notice of Dismissal or Suspension. Filing means receipt in the office designated no later than regular close of business on the last day of the filing period. Failure to file such request in a timely manner shall be deemed a waiver of the right to a hearing and the proposed action shall be effective upon action by the Governing Board without notice or hearing except as may be required in a board meeting agenda.