Result 2. In the target condition, focusing on the 'global' judgments of the sentences (“All gestures”), the mismatch-gesture condition was judged significantly lower than the match-gesture condition: F(1,41)=42.6, p<10-7. This shows that there is a distinction between second and third person in gestural verbs with object marking. Result 3: The mismatch-ellipsis condition was more acceptable than the mismatch-gesture condition (F(1,41)=16.0, p=.00026). This suggests that third person agreement marker can to some extent be ignored in the course of ellipsis resolution. Result 4: However, the mismatch-ellipsis condition was still a bit degraded relative to the match- gesture condition (F(1,41)=15.2, p=.00035). Several potential explanations could come to mind.
Appears in 2 contracts
Sources: Gestural Agreement, Gestural Agreement