Return of Rejected Product Clause Samples

The 'Return of Rejected Product' clause establishes the process and obligations for returning goods that do not meet agreed-upon specifications or quality standards. Typically, this clause outlines the timeframe within which the buyer must notify the seller of defects, the method for returning the nonconforming products, and any responsibilities for shipping or replacement costs. Its core function is to ensure that buyers are not left with defective or unacceptable goods, providing a clear mechanism for rectifying issues and maintaining quality assurance in the transaction.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Return of Rejected Product. If a delivery or partial delivery is rejected by Horizon pursuant to the provisions of the Quality Agreement and there is a determination pursuant to Section 9.1 of the Quality Agreement that such Supplied Product fails to conform to any warranty set forth in Section 9.1 (Supplied Product Warranty), Horizon shall return to AstraZeneca at AstraZeneca’s request and expense (or, at the election of AstraZeneca, destroy at AstraZeneca’s cost and provide evidence of such destruction to AstraZeneca) any such rejected Supplied Product. AstraZeneca shall (a) credit the original invoice in respect of the rejected Supplied Product, and (b) adjust the invoice to Horizon for any Supplied Product that was not rejected, payment of which is due in accordance with the terms of the original invoice. Except as set forth in Section 12.1 (Indemnification by AstraZeneca), this Section 6.2.3 (Return of Rejected Product) shall be Horizon’s sole remedy if AstraZeneca supplies Horizon Supplied Product that fails to conform to any warranty set forth in Section 9.1 (Supplied Product Warranty).
View SourceView Similar (3)
Return of Rejected Product. If a shipment or partial shipment is rejected by ARIAD SWISSCO pursuant to the provisions of Section 11.2.1 and (i) where relevant, ARIAD US does not provide an Objection Notice within the [**] period set forth in Section 11.2.2, (ii) the Parties agree that the Product is Non-Conforming within the [**] period set forth in Section 11.2.2, or (iii) there is a determination by the independent laboratory or consultant in support of ARIAD SWISSCO’s allegation of Non-Conformance, ARIAD SWISSCO shall return to ARIAD US at ARIAD US’s request and expense (or, at the election of ARIAD US, destroy at ARIAD US’s cost and provide evidence of such destruction to ARIAD US) any such rejected Product (provided that if the Product has been packaged by or on behalf of ARIAD SWISSCO at the time of rejection, ARIAD SWISSCO shall not be obliged to remove any packaging prior to its return). ARIAD US shall (i) credit the original invoice in respect of the rejected Product and reimburse ARIAD SWISSCO for any duties, freight, insurance, handling or other charges incurred by ARIAD SWISSCO in respect of such rejected Product, and (ii) adjust the invoice to ARIAD SWISSCO for the Product that was not rejected, payment of which is due in accordance with the terms of the original invoice. Except as set forth in ARTICLES 14 and 22, such credit or adjustment shall be ARIAD US’s sole Liability, and ARIAD SWISSCO’s sole remedy, with respect to any rejected Product.
View SourceView Similar (5)
Return of Rejected Product. In the event Buyer, Buyer's Affiliates, or Buyer's Authorized Agent detects non-conforming Product, a Non-Conforming Material Report (NCMR) and/or a Corrective Action Request (CAR) shall be provided to Seller. Seller has [*] from the return receipt of non-conforming Product to confirm the reason for rejection. Seller must provide a Return Material Authorization (RMA) within [*] after receipt of samples of suspected Product. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Iomega WS, Supplier RM Rev. P, July 30, 1997 -- -- Page 8 of 26 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- If Seller accepts the CAR, the following procedures (the "RMA Procedures") shall apply with respect to the relevant Product: 1. Buyer shall return the discrepant Products to Seller accompanied by the RMA number and send a debit note (invoice) to Seller representing the Prices and quantity of the returned Product; and 2. Buyer may send a Purchase Order to Seller to replace parts at Buyer's discretion; and 3. Seller shall expedite such Purchase Order at Buyer's request by premium transport. Incremental transportation cost shall be absorbed by Seller. Seller shall also conform to the Buyer's closed loop corrective action process.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Return of Rejected Product. If a shipment or partial shipment is rejected by Sanofi pursuant to the provisions of this Section 5.3 and there is not a determination by the
View SourceView Similar (2)
Return of Rejected Product. If a shipment or partial shipment is rejected by Partner pursuant to the provisions of this Section 6.2 and there is not a determination by the independent laboratory or consultant in support of Optimer’s Objection Notice in accordance with Section 6.2(d), Partner shall return to Optimer at Optimer’s request and expense (or, at the election of Optimer, destroy at Optimer’s cost and provide evidence of such destruction to Optimer) any such rejected Supplied Product (provided that if the Supplied Product has been packaged by or on behalf of Partner at the time of rejection Partner shall not be obliged to remove any packaging prior to its return). Optimer shall (i) credit the original invoice in respect of the rejected Supplied Product, and (ii) adjust the invoice to Partner for any Supplied Product that was not rejected, payment of which is due in accordance with the terms of the original invoice.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Return of Rejected Product. If a shipment or partial shipment is rejected by Otsuka pursuant to the provisions of Section 11.5.1 and (i) ARIAD does not provide an Objection Notice within the [***] ([***]) [***] period set forth in Section 11.5.3, (ii) the Parties agree that the Product is Non-Conforming within the [***] ([***]) [***] period set forth in Section 11.5.3, or (iii) there is not a determination by the independent laboratory or consultant in support of ARIAD’s Objection Notice, Otsuka shall return to ARIAD at ARIAD’s request and expense (or, at the election of ARIAD, destroy at ARIAD’s cost and provide evidence of such destruction to ARIAD) any such rejected Product (provided that if the Product has been packaged by or on behalf of Otsuka at the time of rejection, Otsuka shall not be obliged to remove any packaging prior to its return). ARIAD shall (i) credit the original invoice in respect of the rejected Product and reimburse Otsuka for any duties, freight, insurance, handling or other charges incurred by Otsuka in respect of such rejected Product, and (ii) adjust the invoice to Otsuka for the Product that was not rejected, payment of which is due in accordance with the terms of the original invoice. Except as set forth in Article 14 and Section 22.2, such credit or adjustment shall be ARIAD’s sole liability, and Otsuka’s sole remedy, with respect to any rejected Product.
View Source
Return of Rejected Product. All defective and suspect defective Product and Spare Parts will be returned for credit to Seller for failure analysis and corrective action and Seller shall exercise its best effort to ship to Buyer and/or Exabyte replacement Product or Spare Part as soon as possible, yet in any event not later than sixty (60) days from Seller's receipt of such Product or Spare Part. In the event that Seller reasonably determines that such defects and/or failures are the fault of Seller, Seller shall be responsible for all freight charges to return Product to Seller and to ship repaired or replaced Product to Buyer and/or Exabyte. Defects are defined as commodities/parts that do not meet print or Specifications. Failure reports or preliminary analysis shall be due within ten (10) business days after receipt of returned Product by Seller. Each failure analysis report shall determine the root cause and corrective action to be taken.
View Source

Related to Return of Rejected Product

  • AUDIT OF LICENSED PRODUCT USAGE Contractor shall have the right to periodically audit, no more than annually, at Contractor’s expense, use of licensed Product at any site where a copy of the Product resides provided that: (i) Contractor gives Licensee(s) at least thirty (30) days advance written notice, (ii) such audit is conducted during such party’s normal business hours, (iii) the audit is conducted by an independent auditor chosen on mutual agreement of the parties. Contractor shall recommend a minimum of three (3) auditing/accounting firms from which the Licensee will select one (1). In no case shall the Business Software Alliance (BSA), Software Publishers Association (SPA), Software and Industry Information Association (SIIA) or Federation Against Software Theft (FAST) be used directly or indirectly to conduct audits, or be recommended by Contractor; (iv) Contractor and Licensee are each entitled to designate a representative who shall be entitled to participate, and who shall mutually agree on audit format, and simultaneously review all information obtained by the audit. Such representatives also shall be entitled to copies of all reports, data or information obtained from the audit; and (v) if the audit shows that such party is not in compliance, Licensee shall be required to purchase additional licenses or capacities necessary to bring it into compliance and shall pay for the unlicensed capacity at the NYS Net Price in effect at time of audit, or if none, then at the Contractor’s U.S. Commercial list price. Once such additional licenses or capacities are purchased, Licensee shall be deemed to have been in compliance retroactively, and Licensee shall have no further liability of any kind for the unauthorized use of the software.

  • SOURCE CODE ESCROW FOR LICENSED PRODUCT If Source Code or Source Code escrow is offered by either Contractor or Product manufacturer or developer to any other commercial customers, Contractor shall either: (i) provide Licensee with the Source Code for the Product; or (ii) place the Source Code in a third party escrow arrangement with a designated escrow agent who shall be named and identified to the State, and who shall be directed to release the deposited Source Code in accordance with a standard escrow agreement acceptable to the State; or (iii) will certify to the State that the Product manufacturer/developer has named the State, acting by and through the Authorized User, and the Licensee, as a named beneficiary of an established escrow arrangement with its designated escrow agent who shall be named and identified to the State and Licensee, and who shall be directed to release the deposited Source Code in accordance with the terms of escrow. Source Code, as well as any corrections or enhancements to such source code, shall be updated for each new release of the Product in the same manner as provided above and such updating of escrow shall be certified to the State in writing. Contractor shall identify the escrow agent upon commencement of the Contract term and shall certify annually that the escrow remains in effect in compliance with the terms of this paragraph. The State may release the Source Code to Licensees under this Contract who have licensed Product or obtained services, who may use such copy of the Source Code to maintain the Product. B Bid Contents Bid Evaluation Bid Opening Bid Submission 12 29 7 8 D Default - Authorized User Definitions Disqualification for Past Performance Drawings 63 5 35 25 E Emergency Contracts Employees/Subcontractors/Agents Equivalent or Identical Bids Estimated/Specific Quantity Contracts Ethics Compliance Expenses Prior to Contract Execution Extraneous Terms 43 55 33 42 3 19 13 F Facsimile Submissions Freedom of Information Law 9 16 I Indemnification Indemnification Relating to Third Party Rights Independent Contractor Installation Insurance Interest on Late Payments International Bidding 74 75 68 52 77 64 6 L Late Bids Legal Compliance Limitation of Liability 11 73 76 New York State Office of General Services, as part of its responsibility, recognizes the need to promote the employment of minority group members and women and to ensure that certified minority and women-owned business enterprises have opportunities for maximum feasible participation in the performance of OGS contracts. In 2006, the State of New York commissioned a disparity study to evaluate whether minority and women-owned business enterprises had a full and fair opportunity to participate in state contracting. The findings of the study were published on April 29, 2010, under the title "The State of Minority and Women-Owned Business Enterprises: Evidence from New York" (“the Disparity Study”). The report found evidence of statistically significant disparities between the level of participation of minority and women-owned business enterprises in state procurement contracting versus the number of minority and women-owned business enterprises that were ready, willing and able to participate in state procurements. As a result of these findings, the Disparity Study made recommendations concerning the implementation and operation of the statewide certified minority and women-owned business enterprises program. By submission of a bid or proposal in response to this solicitation, the Offerer agrees with all of the terms and conditions of Appendix A including Clause 12 - Equal Employment Opportunities for Minorities and Women. The contractor is required to ensure that it and any subcontractors awarded a subcontract over $25,000 for the construction, demolition, replacement, major repair, renovation, planning or design of real property and improvements thereon (the "Work") except where the Work is for the beneficial use of the Contractor, shall undertake or continue programs to ensure that minority group members and women are afforded equal employment opportunities without discrimination because of race, creed, color, national origin, sex, age, disability or marital status. For these purposes, equal opportunity shall apply in the areas of recruitment, employment, job assignment, promotion, upgrading, demotion, transfer, layoff, termination, and rates of pay or other forms of compensation. This requirement does not apply to: (i) work, goods, or services unrelated to this contract; or (ii) employment outside New York State. Contractor further agrees to submit with the bid a staffing plan (Form EEO 100) identifying the anticipated work force to be utilized on the Contract and if awarded a contract, will, upon request, submit to OGS a workforce utilization report (Form EEO 101) identifying the work force actually utilized on the Contract if known. For purposes of this procurement, OGS hereby establishes a goal of 11% for Minority-owned Business Enterprises (MBE) participation and 9% for Women-owned Business Enterprises (WBE) participation (collectively referred to as MWBE), for a total contract MWBE goal of 20%. A Contractor must document good faith efforts to provide meaningful participation by MWBEs as subcontractors or suppliers in the performance of this Contract and Contractor agrees that OGS may withhold payment pending receipt of the required MWBE documentation. The directory of New York State Certified MWBEs can be viewed at: ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇▇/MWBE.html. For guidance on how OGS will determine a Contractor’s “good faith efforts,” refer to 5 NYCRR §142.8. In accordance with 5 NYCRR §142.13, Offeror/Contractor acknowledges that if it is found to have willfully and intentionally failed to comply with the MWBE participation goals set forth in the Contract, such finding constitutes a breach of Contract and OGS may withhold payment from the Contractor as liquidated damages. Such liquidated damages shall be calculated as an amount equaling the difference between: (1) all sums identified for payment to MWBEs had the Contractor achieved the contractual MWBE goals; and (2) all sums actually paid to MWBEs for work performed or materials supplied under the Contract. By submitting a bid or proposal, Offeror/Contractor agrees to submit the following documents and information as evidence of compliance with the foregoing: A. Offeror is required to submit a Utilization Plan on Form MWBE 100 with their bid or proposal. The Utilization Plan shall list the MWBEs the Contractor intends to use to perform the State contract and a description of the Contract scope of work that the Contractor intends to structure to meet the goals on the State contract, and the estimated or, if known, actual dollar amounts to be paid to and performance dates of each component of a State contract that the Contractor intends to be performed by a NYS Certified minority- or woman-owned business. Any modifications or changes to the agreed participation by NYS Certified M/WBEs after the Contract Award and during the term of the Contract must be reported on a revised M/WBE Utilization Plan and submitted to OGS. B. OGS will review the submitted MWBE Utilization Plan and advise the Offeror of OGS acceptance or issue a notice of deficiency within 20 days of receipt. C. If a notice of deficiency is issued, Offeror agrees that it shall respond to the notice of deficiency within seven (7) business days of receipt by submitting to the OGS Office of Minority and Women-Owned Enterprises, [35th Floor, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Phone: (▇▇▇) ▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇ Fax: (518) ▇▇▇- ▇▇▇▇], a written remedy in response to the notice of deficiency. If the written remedy that is submitted is not timely or is found by OGS to be inadequate, OGS shall notify the Offeror and direct the Offeror to submit, within five (5) business days, a request for a partial or total waiver of MWBE participation goals on Form MWBE101/BDC 333. Failure to file the waiver form in a timely manner may be grounds for disqualification of the bid or proposal. D. OGS may disqualify an Offeror as being non-responsive under the following circumstances: a) If an Offeror fails to submit a MWBE Utilization Plan; b) If an Offeror fails to submit a written remedy to a notice of deficiency; c) If an Offeror fails to submit a request for waiver; or d) If OGS determines that the Offeror has failed to document good faith efforts. An Offeror who documents good faith efforts to meet the goal requirements may submit a request for a partial or total waiver on form MWBE 101/BDC 333, at the same time it submits its MWBE Utilization Plan. If a request for waiver is submitted with the MWBE Utilization Plan and is not accepted by OGS at that time, the provisions of clauses B-D above, will apply. A Contractor shall attempt to utilize, in good faith, any MBE or WBE identified within its MWBE Utilization Plan, during the performance of the Contract. Requests for a partial or total waiver of established goal requirements made subsequent to Contract Award may be made at any time during the term of the Contract to OGS, but must be made no later than prior to the submission of a request for final payment on the Contract. A Contractor is required to submit a Contractor’s Monthly Compliance & Payment Report on Form MWBE 102 to the OGS Office of Minority and Women-Owned Enterprises, [35th Floor, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Phone: (▇▇▇) ▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇ Fax: (▇▇▇) ▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇], by the 10th day of each month during the term of the Contract documenting the progress made toward achievement of the MWBE goals of the Contract.

  • Licensed Product The term “Licensed Product” shall mean any product (a) the manufacture, use, importation, sale or offer for sale of which would, in the absence of the license granted by this Agreement, infringe a Valid Claim of any of the Licensed Patent Rights, or (b) that is comprised of, utilizes or incorporates Licensed Biological Materials, or (c) that is discovered, developed or made using a Licensed Process.

  • Limited Product Warranty Repair or Replacement within 12 years

  • Development Milestone Payments TriSalus shall pay (or cause to be paid) to Dynavax, in accordance with and subject to the terms of this Section 2.3, Section 2.4 and Section 6.4 (each such milestone, a “Development Milestone”, and each payment in respect thereof, a “Development Milestone Payment”): (i) Upon the successful completion by a Milestone Obligor after the Closing of a [**] study with respect to a Product using PEDD, a payment of [**] US Dollars ($[**]), with such Development Milestone Payment being payable only once (for purposes of the foregoing, successful completion means completion of such study in accordance with the plan for such study); (ii) For the first patient Dosed by a Milestone Obligor in each Phase 1 Clinical Trial for a Product for each Indication, a payment of [**] US Dollars ($[**]), up to a maximum of [**] such payments, regardless of how many Indications are pursued for a Product or how many Products are in development by Milestone Obligor; (iii) For the first patient Dosed by a Milestone Obligor in each Phase 2 Clinical Trial for a Product for each Indication, a payment of [**] US Dollars ($[**]), up to a maximum of [**] such payments regardless of how many Indications are pursued for a Product or how many Products are in development by Milestone Obligor; (iv) For each Phase 2 Clinical Trial for a Product for each Indication conducted by or on behalf of a Milestone Obligor meeting the primary endpoint for such Phase 2 Clinical Trial based on full tables, figures and listings or continued development of such Product for the same Indication as such Phase 2 Clinical Trial, a payment of [**] US Dollars ($[**]), up to a maximum of [**] such payments, regardless of how many Indications are pursued for a Product or how many Products are in development by Milestone Obligor; (v) For each Phase 3 Clinical Trial for a Product for each Indication conducted by or on behalf of a Milestone Obligor meeting the primary endpoint for such Phase 3 Clinical Trial based on full tables, figures and listings or continued development of such Product for the same Indication as such Phase 3 Clinical Trial, a payment of [**] US Dollars ($[**]), up to a maximum of [**] such payments, regardless of how many Indications are pursued for a Product or how many Products are in development by Milestone Obligor; (vi) Upon receipt by a Milestone Obligor of each Regulatory Approval for any Product for any Indication in the U.S., a payment of [**] US Dollars ($[**]), up to a maximum of [**] such payments, regardless of how many Indications are pursued for a Product or how many Products achieve Regulatory Approval; (vii) Upon receipt by a Milestone Obligor for each Regulatory Approval of any Product for any Indication in any country or region outside the U.S., a payment of [**] US Dollars ($[**]), up to a maximum of [**] such payments, regardless of how many Indications are pursued for a Product or how many Products achieve Regulatory Approval; (viii) Upon receipt by a Milestone Obligor for each Regulatory Approval for a Product with Orphan Drug Exclusivity for each Indication of a Product in the U.S., a payment of [**] US Dollars ($[**]), up to a maximum of [**] such payments (which, for clarity, shall be payable in addition to the Development Milestone payable under Section 2.3(a)(vi) for receipt of such Regulatory Approval), regardless of how many Indications are pursued for a Product or how many Products achieve Regulatory Approval; and (ix) Upon receipt by a Milestone Obligor for each Regulatory Approval for a Product with Orphan Drug Exclusivity for each Indication of a Product in any country or region outside the U.S., a payment of [**] US Dollars ($[**]), up to a maximum of [**] such payments (which, for clarity, shall be payable in addition to the Development Milestone payable under Section 2.3(a)(vii) for receipt of such Regulatory Approval), regardless ​ of how many Indications are pursued for a Product or how many Products achieve Regulatory Approval.