Review and approve Clause Samples

The "Review and approve" clause establishes a process by which one party must examine and formally accept or reject certain deliverables, documents, or actions before they are finalized or implemented. Typically, this clause outlines the timeframe for review, the criteria for approval, and the steps to be taken if revisions are required, such as when a client reviews a draft report or design before it is finalized. Its core practical function is to ensure quality control and mutual agreement, preventing misunderstandings or disputes by requiring explicit consent before proceeding.
Review and approve closure plans for units where waste management facilities once stored, treated or disposed of hazardous waste. Many facilities that previously stored, treated or disposed of hazardous waste have elected not to obtain a RCRA permit for these activities. These facilities must complete closure of all the units where they conducted hazardous waste management activities. Closure must be carried out in accordance with plans approved by BOL. • BOL will ensure that 90 percent (or 50 of 56) of the Government Performance & Results Act Baseline Post-Closure Universe5 will have “approved controls in place” by FY05. Approved controls in place mean: (a) a post-closure permit has been issued for the unit, or an existing permit at the facility has been modified so that the unit in question is subject to the post-closure permitting standards; (b) the unit has achieved clean closure, as verified by BOL; (c) the unit has properly closed with waste in place, as verified by BOL, (d) a post-closure plan or similar enforceable document (such as a consent order) covers appropriate post-closure obligations, including 40 CFR Part 264 Subparts F and G, groundwater monitoring and cap maintenance requirements; (e) the unit is situated among solid waste management units, and closure and post-closure obligations at the unit are covered by a corrective action order or a similar enforceable document (including 40 CFR Part 264 Subparts F and G groundwater monitoring and cap maintenance requirements, as applicable); (f) the unit has been accepted by one of the state or federal cleanup programs for remediation; or (g) the application of other controls approved by BOL (as determined on a case-by-case basis). At the end of FY04, 91 percent (or 51 of 56) of the Government Performance & Results Act Baseline Post-Closure Universe had approved controls in place. 5Government Performance & Results Act Baseline Post-Closure Universe are those facilities undergoing closure of all of its hazardous waste management land-based units (e.g., landfills, waste piles, surface impoundments) as of October 1, 1997. For FY05, BOL will issue one additional post-closure permit, increasing the percentage of facilities on the Government Performance & Results Act Baseline Post- Closure Universe with controls in place to 93 percent.
Review and approve closure plans for units where waste management facilities once stored, treated or disposed of hazardous waste. Many facilities that previously stored, treated or disposed of hazardous waste have elected not to obtain a RCRA permit for these activities. These facilities must complete closure of all the units where they conducted hazardous waste management activities. Closure must be carried out in accordance with plans approved by BOL. • Currently BOL has 95% (52 of %%) of the Government Performance & Results Act Baseline Post-Closure Universe with “approved controls in place.” Approved controls in place mean: (a) a post-closure permit has been issued for the unit, or an existing permit at the facility has been modified so that the unit in question is subject to the post-closure permitting standards; (b) the unit has achieved clean closure, as verified by BOL; (c) the unit has properly closed with waste in place, as verified by BOL, (d) a post-closure plan or similar enforceable document (such as a consent order) covers appropriate post-closure obligations, including 40 CFR Part 264 Subparts F and G, groundwater monitoring and cap maintenance requirements;
Review and approve. Operating Agent's estimate of the annual capital expenditures budget and the annual maintenance budget relating to the Connecting Facilities to be submitted by Operating Agent to the Parties at the same time and place as other budgets are to be submitted as set forth in the Operating Agreement.

Related to Review and approve

  • Review and Approval The Supplier confirms and agrees that it shall apply to receive ISR's written consent, wherever ISR's consent, explicitly or implied, is required according to this Agreement. This requirement and the provision of ISR consent, shall not derogate in any way from Supplier's responsibilities and liabilities under this Agreement, and ISR shall bear no responsibility or liability whatsoever in connection with the review (whether or not there are objections) and/or with any approval given to, or denied from, Supplier, with respect to any matter and/or document, including but without limitation, drawings, designs (at all phases), plans, tests or otherwise.

  • Review and Appeal 1. Each Party shall ensure that the importers in its territory have access to administrative review within the customs administration that issued the decision subject to review or, where applicable, the higher authority supervising the administration and/or judicial review of the determination taken at the final level of administrative review, in accordance with the Party's domestic law. 2. The decision on appeal shall be given to the appellant and the reasons for such decision shall be provided in writing. 3. The level of administrative review may include any authority supervising the customs administration of a Party.

  • Inspection and Approval ▇▇▇▇▇▇ agrees that OUSD has the right and agrees to provide OUSD with the opportunity to inspect any and all aspects of the SERVICES performed including, but not limited to, any materials (physical or electronic) produced, created, edited, modified, reviewed, or otherwise used in the preparation, performance, or evaluation of the SERVICES. In accordance with Paragraph 3 (Compensation), the SERVICES performed by VENDOR must meet the approval of OUSD, and OUSD reserves the right to direct VENDOR to redo the SERVICES, in whole or in part, if OUSD, in its sole discretion, determines that the SERVICES were not performed in accordance with this AGREEMENT.

  • Review Scope The parties confirm that the Asset Representations Review is not responsible for (a) reviewing the Receivables for compliance with the representations and warranties under the Transaction Documents, except as described in this Agreement or (b) determining whether noncompliance with the representations and warranties constitutes a breach of the Eligibility Representations. For the avoidance of doubt, the parties confirm that the review is not designed to determine why an Obligor is delinquent or the creditworthiness of the Obligor, either at the time of any Asset Review or at the time of origination of the related Receivable. Further, the Asset Review is not designed to establish cause, materiality or recourse for any Test Fail (as defined in Section 3.05).

  • Consent and Approvals Except as otherwise expressly provided, in order to be effective, all consents or approvals required under this Agreement must be in writing.