Review and Response Sample Clauses

The "Review and Response" clause establishes a process by which one party submits documents, deliverables, or information for the other party's evaluation and feedback. Typically, this clause sets out specific timeframes within which the receiving party must review the materials and provide comments, approvals, or requests for changes. Its core practical function is to ensure timely communication and decision-making, preventing unnecessary project delays and clarifying expectations for both parties.
Review and Response. All warnings will be issued in writing and outline the reasons for the warning. Drivers will have 5 business days to respond or request a review. Where a review is requested, a BDT manager will assess the case and issue a final outcome in writing.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Review and Response. After the City’s receipt of a Plan Submittal, the City shall provide SBH with written notice of any comments. The amount of time available for the City’s review of each Plan Submittal shall be established in the Schedule and shall take into consideration the content and substance of each such Plan Submittal. As part of the review of the budget, the City shall have the right to confirm that the funds contributed by the City are being spent solely on the ESC Project. If the Plan Submittal is the (1) schematic design documents, (2) design development documents, (3) the plans and specifications, or (4) the GMP documents, the City shall also provide SBH with written notice of whether the City has reasonably determined that such documents comply with the Quality Standard and the ESC Preliminary Program. Any such notice shall detail the reasons for any such failure to comply. If the City fails to timely respond (absent an extension agreed upon by the Parties) to a Plan Submittal, the City shall be deemed to have approved such Plan Submittal.
View Source
Review and Response. Audits will be conducted at least semi-annually. The audit results will be reported to the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, Manager of Information Technology, and Human Resources to further assess potential security weakness or further investigation. Such audits will be conducted to: a. Ensure integrity, confidentiality and availability of information and resources; b. Investigate possible security incidents and ensure conformance with security policies; and to
View Source
Review and Response. ‌ To the extent possible, the receiving party shall be given ten (10) workdays to review and respond to the proposal. • If an extension is desired by the receiving party, the receiving party must make a request for an extension prior to expiration of the initial ten (10) workdays. At the receiving party’s request, the initial review and response period will be extended by another ten (10) workdays. • If the receiving party desires additional information, it must be requested within the initial ten (10) workdays given for the review and response period. The initiating party will have ten (10) workdays to respond and/or provide additional information, if available. Or If the receiving party wishes to negotiate over any aspect of the proposed change, it shall notify the other party by submitting a demand to bargain and written proposals within ten (10) working days of receipt of the notice (or receipt of any requested briefing or information, whichever is later).
View Source
Review and Response. Timely submission of complete responses to Requests For Information (RFIs) regarding the equipment and systems within the scope of commissioning: Timely review of submittals for the equipment and systems within the scope of commissioning and ensure compliance with the commissioning plan; within the specified deadlines, for the following:
View Source
Review and Response. ‌ Proposals will not be considered until all of the above requirements have been met. Once all of the required submittals have been received, CITY REP will respond within ten (10) working days in writing as to whether or not the proposal will be considered for detailed evaluation. If no such notice is issued within the time allotted, the proposal shall be deemed rejected. A. CITY will not be liable for any delay in acting upon any proposal nor for any failure to accept any proposal pursuant to this subsection. B. CITY will be the sole judge of the acceptability of a proposal and of the estimated net savings in construction costs from the adoption of all or any part of the proposal. CONTRACTOR will be notified in writing by the CITY REP as to whether the CONTRACTOR'S proposal has been accepted. The decision by the CITY is final. C. When CITY deems such action to be appropriate, it reserves the right to require the CONTRACTOR to share in the cost to the CITY of investigating, evaluating, and processing the proposal as a condition for the consideration of such proposal. Such cost shall be shared whether the proposal is accepted or rejected. When such a condition is imposed, the CONTRACTOR shall indicate their acceptance thereof in writing and such acceptance shall authorize the CITY to deduct the CONTRACTOR'S share of the CITY'S costs from any monies due or that may become due to the CONTRACTOR under the Contract.
View Source

Related to Review and Response

  • Academic Freedom and Responsibility 6.1 The University and United Academics agree that academic freedom is essential to the mission of the University and that providing an environment of free and honest inquiry is essential to its functioning. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed to limit or abridge any individual's right to free speech or to infringe upon the academic freedom of any member of the University community. 6.2 Academic freedom is accompanied by the corresponding responsibility to provide objective and skillful exposition of one's subject, to at all times be accurate, to exercise appropriate restraint, to show respect for the opinions of others and to indicate when appropriate that one is an institutional representative. 6.3 The University of Alaska and United Academics endorse the “1940 Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure with 1970 Interpretive Comments,” issued by the American Association of University Professors and the Association of American Colleges, and the 1999 statement “On Collegiality As a Criterion for Faculty Evaluation,” issued by the American Association of University Professors. 6.4 The University of Alaska and United Academics agree that all members of the academic community have an obligation to maintain accepted standards of civility and professionalism.

  • Employee Response The employee upon whom a Notice of Proposed Action has been served shall have seven (7) calendar days to respond to the appointing authority either orally or in writing before the proposed action may be taken. Upon request of the employee and for good cause, the appointing authority may extend in writing the period to respond. If the employee's response is not filed within seven (7) days or during an extension, the right to respond is lost.

  • Timely and Sustained Response Interconnection Customer shall ensure that the Small Generating Facility’s real power response to sustained frequency deviations outside of the deadband setting is automatically provided and shall begin immediately after frequency deviates outside of the deadband, and to the extent the Small Generating Facility has operating capability in the direction needed to correct the frequency deviation. Interconnection Customer shall not block or otherwise inhibit the ability of the governor or equivalent controls to respond and shall ensure that the response is not inhibited, except under certain operational constraints including, but not limited to, ambient temperature limitations, physical energy limitations, outages of mechanical equipment, or regulatory requirements. The Small Generating Facility shall sustain the real power response at least until system frequency returns to a value within the deadband setting of the governor or equivalent controls. An Applicable Reliability Standard with equivalent or more stringent requirements shall supersede the above requirements.