Common use of REVIEW OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS Clause in Contracts

REVIEW OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 3.2.1 Before Contractor delivers the Incentive Benchmark Proposal to MSG, Contractor shall carefully study the Contract Documents and shall notify Architect and MSG in writing of any errors, inconsistencies, ambiguities or omissions Contractor has identified therein. 3.2.2 Contractor shall not be liable to MSG, Architect or Project Manager with respect to any error, inconsistency or omission in the Contract Documents except to the extent Contractor: (a) knew of such error, inconsistency or omission based on its review of the Contract Documents; and (b) failed to notify MSG or Architect in writing of such error, inconsistency or omission before Contractor delivered the Incentive Benchmark Proposal to MSG. In such event, Contractor shall be liable for the cost that would have otherwise been avoided had Contractor reported such error, inconsistency or omission to MSG and Architect as required under this Section 3.2.2 and shall not be entitled to recover such cost as a Cost of the Work or an adjustment to the Substantial Completion Date. 3.2.3 In the event that errors, inconsistencies or omissions are discovered by Contractor in the Contract Documents, Contractor shall not proceed with the affected portions of the Work until Contractor has submitted an RFI to, and received written interpretation with respect thereto from, Architect. An unanswered RFI shall not become a reason by itself for an extension of time unless Architect fails to respond to such RFI within ten (10) Business Days after receipt thereof and Contractor can otherwise demonstrate that such failure to respond results in a delay to the critical path of the Work. If Contractor: (a) delivers an RFI with respect to an error, inconsistency or omission in the Contract Documents, but proceeds with Work involving such error, inconsistency or omission prior to receiving clarification from Architect; or (b) knows that an error, inconsistency or omission exists in the Contract Documents but nonetheless proceeds with Work involving such error, inconsistency or omission without submitting an RFI to Architect, then Contractor shall correct such Work performed to comply with Architect’s reasonable interpretation of the Contract Documents and Contractor shall not be entitled to recover the cost of such correction as a Cost of the Work or an adjustment to the Substantial Completion Date.

Appears in 3 contracts

Sources: Construction Agreement (MSG Entertainment Spinco, Inc.), Construction Agreement (MSG Entertainment Spinco, Inc.), Construction Agreement (Madison Square Garden Co)