Revisions to Guide to Fees on Government’s Recommendation Sample Clauses

Revisions to Guide to Fees on Government’s Recommendation. (a) When the Government wishes to recommend the creation of a new fee item or any revisions to existing fee items in the Guide to Fees, it will: (i) consult with the Tariff Committee and with the Health Authorities to identify any comments or concerns they may have respecting such recommendations; (ii) subject to (iii) below, attempt to achieve agreement in writing with the Doctors of BC through the Tariff Committee on the recommended changes, and if such agreement is reached, section 13.1 shall apply; and (iii) with respect to the Fees transferred to the Payment Schedule pursuant to Appendix I, the Tariff Committee will, prior to reaching an agreement with the Government on the recommended changes, consult with the applicable Joint Clinical Committee(s) to identify any comments or concerns it may have respecting the recommended changes. (b) If agreement is not reached between the Government and the Doctors of BC pursuant to section 12.2(a)(ii) within 90 days of written notification from the Government to the Doctors of BC of a proposed revision pursuant to this section 12.2, or such additional time as may be agreed, the Government may advise the Doctors of BC that it intends to refer the matter to an ad hoc joint review panel as provided in section 12.2(c). (c) The joint review panel must be appointed within 60 days of the Government advising the Doctors of BC that it intends to refer the matter to an ad hoc joint review panel. The composition of the joint review panel shall be three members, with one member appointed by the Doctors of BC, one member appointed by the Government, and the third member who shall be the Chair, selected from a roster of individuals agreed upon by the Government and the Doctors of BC. The members appointed shall be chosen so as to avoid conflicts of interest. If the Government and the Doctors of BC have not agreed upon the roster, the MSC will appoint the Chair. (d) The joint review panel must render a majority recommendation to the parties and the MSC within three months of its appointment.
View SourceView Similar (9)
Revisions to Guide to Fees on Government’s Recommendation. (a) When the Government wishes to recommend the creation of a new fee item or any revisions to existing fee items in the Guide to Fees, it will: (i) Consult with the Tariff Committee and with the Health Authorities to identify any comments or concerns they may have respecting such recommendations; and‌ (ii) attempt to achieve agreement in writing with the BCMA through the Tariff Committee on the recommended changes, and if such agreement is reached, section 14.1 shall apply. (b) If agreement is not reached between the Government and the BCMA through the Tariff Committee pursuant to section 13.2(a)(ii), the Government may refer the matter to an ad hoc joint review panel as provided in section 13.2(c). (c) The composition of the joint review panel shall be three members, with one member appointed by the BCMA, one member appointed by the Government, and the third member who shall be the Chair, selected from a roster of individuals agreed upon by the Government and the BCMA. The members appointed shall be chosen so as to avoid conflicts of interest. If the Government and the BCMA have not agreed upon the roster, the MSC will appoint the Chair. (d) The joint review panel must render a majority recommendation to the parties and the MSC within three months of its appointment. (e) If the Government and the BCMA support in writing the recommendation of the joint review panel, the BCMA shall change the Guide to Fees accordingly and section 14.1 shall apply. (f) If either the Government or the BCMA does not support in writing the recommendation of the joint review panel, the MSC will decide the matter in accordance with section 14.2, and if the MSC decides that a change to the Guide to Fees should be made, the BCMA will implement the change to the Guide to Fees.
View Source

Related to Revisions to Guide to Fees on Government’s Recommendation

  • Conclusions and Recommendations Based on our country-by-country analysis, 197 of the AEWA populations are already well-monitored both for population size and trend. Our prioritisation method allowed focusing on the AEWA conservation and management priorities (Priorities 1-2) and to consider cost effectiveness and feasibility (Priorities 3-6). Theoretically, the two- third target of the AEWA Strategic Plan can be just attained by focusing on the development of monitoring activities for Priority 1-5 populations (i.e. leaving out the 168 more widespread Priority 6 populations that would require more species-specific monitoring methods. Most of the Priority 1-5 populations would require improvement of the IWC though regional schemes focusing on the West Asian / East African flyway with possibly three subregional components in the Central Asia, Arabia and Eastern and Southern Africa. In the latter region, improvements in Tanzania and Mozambique are particularly important. In the Black Sea - Mediterranean - Sahelian flyway the focus should be primarily on the Sahel countries and especially on increasing the consistency of annual counts. The quality of monitoring is already better in the Black Sea and Mediterranean regions. In the East Atlantic, the ongoing capacity-building activities should continue and the consistency and representativity of site coverage should be further strengthened in most countries. Angola would require a major capacity improvement but primarily for the intra-African migrants on inland wetlands. It is also clear that the targets of the AEWA Strategic Plan cannot be achieved without complementing the IWC with periodic aerial surveys both in Western Africa as well as in Eastern and Southern Africa, by setting up a periodic offshore waterbird monitoring scheme in the Caspian Sea and by focusing in each country on a relatively small number of breeding bird species strategically selected in this report.

  • Certification of Meeting or Exceeding Tobacco-Free Workplace Policy Minimum Standards A. Grantee certifies that it has adopted and enforces a Tobacco-Free Workplace Policy that meets or exceeds all of the following minimum standards of: i. Prohibiting the use of all forms of tobacco products, including but not limited to cigarettes, cigars, pipes, water pipes (hookah), bidis, kreteks, electronic cigarettes, smokeless tobacco, snuff and chewing tobacco; ii. Designating the property to which this Policy applies as a "designated area,” which must at least comprise all buildings and structures where activities funded under this Grant Agreement are taking place, as well as Grantee owned, leased, or controlled sidewalks, parking lots, walkways, and attached parking structures immediately adjacent to this designated area; iii. Applying to all employees and visitors in this designated area; and iv. Providing for or referring its employees to tobacco use cessation services. B. If Grantee cannot meet these minimum standards, it must obtain a waiver from the System Agency.

  • Notices; Standards for Decisions and Determinations The Administrative Agent will promptly notify the Borrower and the Lenders of (A) the implementation of any Benchmark Replacement, and (B) the effectiveness of any Conforming Changes in connection with the use, administration, adoption or implementation of a Benchmark Replacement. The Administrative Agent will notify the Borrower of (x) the removal or reinstatement of any tenor of a Benchmark pursuant to paragraph (iv) below and (y) the commencement of any Benchmark Unavailability Period. Any determination, decision or election that may be made by the Administrative Agent or, if applicable, any Lender (or group of Lenders) pursuant to this Section, including any determination with respect to a tenor, rate or adjustment or of the occurrence or non-occurrence of an event, circumstance or date and any decision to take or refrain from taking any action or any selection, will be conclusive and binding absent manifest error and may be made in its or their sole discretion and without consent from any other party to this Agreement or any other Loan Document except, in each case, as expressly required pursuant to this Section.

  • Exceptions to Informal Negotiations and Arbitration The Parties agree that the following Disputes are not subject to the above provisions concerning informal negotiations and binding arbitration: (a) any Disputes seeking to enforce or protect, or concerning the validity of, any of the intellectual property rights of a Party; (b) any Dispute related to, or arising from, allegations of theft, piracy, invasion of privacy, or unauthorized use; and (c) any claim for injunctive relief. If this provision is found to be illegal or unenforceable, then neither Party will elect to arbitrate any Dispute falling within that portion of this provision found to be illegal or unenforceable and such Dispute shall be decided by a court of competent jurisdiction within the courts listed for jurisdiction above, and the Parties agree to submit to the personal jurisdiction of that court. There may be information on the Site that contains typographical errors, inaccuracies, or omissions, including descriptions, pricing, availability, and various other information. We reserve the right to correct any errors, inaccuracies, or omissions and to change or update the information on the Site at any time, without prior notice.

  • Provisions Applicable to FMR Fiioc and FSC 1. For the services and facilities to be furnished hereunder, the Adviser shall receive a monthly management fee, payable monthly by each class of the Fund as soon as practicable after the last day of each month, composed of a Basic Fee and a Performance Adjustment. Except as otherwise provided in sub-paragraph (e) of this paragraph 1, the Performance Adjustment is added to or subtracted from the Basic Fee depending on whether the Fund experienced better or worse performance than an appropriate index (the “Index”). The Performance Adjustment is not cumulative. An increased fee will result even though the performance of the Fund over some period of time shorter than the performance period has been behind that of the Index, and, conversely, a reduction in the fee will be made for a month even though the performance of the Fund over some period of time shorter than the performance period has been ahead of that of the Index. The Basic Fee for a class and the Performance Adjustment will be computed as follows: