Risk of Incompatible Wallet Service Sample Clauses

The 'Risk of Incompatible Wallet Service' clause defines the allocation of responsibility and risk when a user attempts to use a digital wallet service that is not compatible with the platform or system in question. In practice, this clause clarifies that users are solely responsible for ensuring their chosen wallet service is supported and compatible, and that the platform is not liable for any losses, errors, or failures resulting from the use of incompatible wallets. Its core function is to protect the platform from liability and to ensure users are aware of the risks associated with using unsupported wallet services, thereby promoting clarity and risk allocation.
Risk of Incompatible Wallet Service. The wallet or wallet service provider used for the acquisition and storage of the Tokens, has to be technically compatible with the Tokens. The failure to assure this may have the result that purchaser of the Tokens will not gain access to his Tokens.
Risk of Incompatible Wallet Service the wallet or wallet service provider used for the contribution, has to conform to the ERC20 token standard in order to be be technically compatible with the Token. The failure to ensure such conformity may have the result that Contributor will not gain access to his Token.
Risk of Incompatible Wallet Service. The purchaser understands and accepts, that the wallet or wallet service provider used for purchasing TUTs (or STUTs), has to be technically compatible with the TUTs (or STUTs). Failure to assure this may have the result that the purchaser will not gain access to his/her TUTs (or STUTs), respectively.
Risk of Incompatible Wallet Service. The wallet or wallet service provider used for the acquisition and storage of the Tokens has to be technically compatible with the Tokens. The failure to assure this may have the result that purchaser of the Tokens will not gain access to his Tokens. Risks of Theft of the Funds Raised in the Token Sale. The Company will make every effort to ensure that the funds received from the Token Sale will be securely held through the implementation of security measures. Notwithstanding such security measures, there is no assurance that there will be no theft of the cryptocurrencies as a result of hacks, sophisticated cyber-attacks, distributed denials of service or errors, vulnerabilities, or defects on the Website, in the smart contract(s), on the Ethereum or any other blockchain, or otherwise. Such events may include, for example, flaws in programming or source code leading to exploitation or abuse thereof. In such event, even if the Token Sale is 3. 1. Риск утраты закрытых ключей. Токены могут храниться владельцем токенов в его цифровом кошельке или хранилище, для доступа к которому требуется закрытый ключ или комбинация закрытых ключей. Соответственно, утрата необходимых закрытых ключей, связанных с цифровым кошельком владельца токенов или хранилищем, в котором хранятся Токены, приведет к потере таких Токенов, утрате доступа к балансу Токенов владельца токенов и (или) любым начальным остаткам в блокчейнах, созданных третьими лицами. Кроме того, любое третье лицо, получившее доступ к таким закрытым ключам, в том числе путем получения доступа к учетным данным входа на используемый владельцем токенов сервис хостинг-кошелька или хранилища, может незаконно завладеть Токенами владельца токенов.

Related to Risk of Incompatible Wallet Service

  • Switching System Hierarchy and Trunking Requirements For purposes of routing ECI traffic to Verizon, the subtending arrangements between Verizon Tandem Switches and Verizon End Office Switches shall be the same as the Tandem/End Office subtending arrangements Verizon maintains for the routing of its own or other carriers’ traffic (i.e., traffic will be routed to the appropriate Verizon Tandem subtended by the terminating End Office serving the Verizon Customer). For purposes of routing Verizon traffic to ECI, the subtending arrangements between ECI Tandem Switches and ECI End Office Switches shall be the same as the Tandem/End Office subtending arrangements that ECI maintains for the routing of its own or other carriers’ traffic.

  • Year 2000 Compatibility Take all actions necessary to assure the Borrower's computer based systems are able to operate and effectively process data on and after January 1, 2000. At the request of the Lender, the Borrower shall provide the Lender with assurance acceptable to the Lender that Borrower's computer systems have Year 2000 compatibility.

  • Information Technology Enterprise Architecture Requirements If this Contract involves information technology-related products or services, the Contractor agrees that all such products or services are compatible with any of the technology standards found at ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇▇/iot/2394.htm that are applicable, including the assistive technology standard. The State may terminate this Contract for default if the terms of this paragraph are breached.

  • Personally Owned Professional Material The employer shall reimburse an employee to a maximum of $150 for loss, damage or personal insurance deductible to personally owned professional material brought to the employee’s workplace to assist in the execution of the employee’s duties, provided that: a. The loss or damage is not the result of negligence on the part of the employee claiming compensation; b. The claim for loss or damage exceeds ten (10) dollars; c. If applicable, a copy of the claim approval from their insurance carrier shall be provided to the employer; d. The appropriate Principal or Vice-Principal reports that the loss was sustained while on assignment for the employer.

  • System Logging The system must maintain an automated audit trail which can 20 identify the user or system process which initiates a request for PHI COUNTY discloses to 21 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY, 22 or which alters such PHI. The audit trail must be date and time stamped, must log both successful and 23 failed accesses, must be read only, and must be restricted to authorized users. If such PHI is stored in a 24 database, database logging functionality must be enabled. Audit trail data must be archived for at least 3 25 years after occurrence.