Robustness Verification List Sample Clauses

The Robustness Verification List clause establishes a set of criteria or tests that a product, system, or process must meet to demonstrate its reliability and resilience under various conditions. Typically, this clause outlines specific scenarios, stress tests, or performance benchmarks that must be satisfied before acceptance or deployment. By clearly defining these requirements, the clause ensures that the deliverable can withstand expected and unexpected challenges, thereby reducing the risk of failure and enhancing overall quality assurance.
Robustness Verification List. The Robustness Verification List shall be completed by Adopter for each Implementation (or portion thereof) for which Adopter seeks Third Party Review. DTLA may amend the Robustness Verification List form from time to time in accordance with Section 3.3 of the Agreement.
Robustness Verification List. Before distributing any Licensed Product, Adopter must perform tests and analyses (as prescribed herein) to assure compliance with these Robustness Rules. A Robustness Verification List for Implementations is attached as Exhibit C-1 for Implementations of L1 protection, and as Exhibit C-2 for Implementations of L2 protection. The purpose of the Robustness Verification List is to enumerate tests that must be performed by Adopter, covering the important aspects of these Robustness Rules, thereby to assist Adopter in ensuring that its products achieve the prescribed levels of robustness and effectively frustrate known and anticipated attacks. Adopter shall reflect the results of the tests and analyses referenced above in a completed Robustness Verification List for each of its Implementations. Inasmuch as the Robustness Verification Lists may not address all elements required for the manufacture of a Compliant product, Adopter is strongly advised to review carefully the DTCP2 Specification and Compliance Rules (including, for avoidance of doubt, these Robustness Rules) so as to evaluate thoroughly both its testing procedures and the compliance of its Implementations in Licensed Products. Adopter further is referred to the additional obligations relating to the Robustness Verification List required under Section 4 of the Procedural Appendix.

Related to Robustness Verification List

  • E-VERIFICATION The Vendor represents and warrants that it will ensure its compliance with the Mississippi Employment Protection Act of 2008, and will register and participate in the status verification system for all newly hired employees. Mississippi Code Annotated §§71-11-1 et seq. The term “employee” as used herein means any person that is hired to perform work within the State of Mississippi. As used herein, “status verification system” means the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigration Responsibility Act of 1996 that is operated by the United States Department of Homeland Security, also known as the E-Verify Program, or any other successor electronic verification system replacing the E-Verify Program. Vendor agrees to maintain records of such compliance. Upon request of the State and after approval of the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security when required, Vendor agrees to provide a copy of each such verification. Vendor further represents and warrants that any person assigned to perform services hereafter meets the employment eligibility requirements of all immigration laws. The breach of this agreement may subject Vendor to the following: termination of this contract for goods or services and ineligibility for any state or public contract in Mississippi for up to three (3) years with notice of such cancellation/termination being made public; the loss of any license, permit, certification, or other document granted to Vendor by an agency, department or governmental entity for the right to do business in Mississippi for up to one (1) year; or,

  • Medical Verification The Town may require medical verification of an employee’s absence if the Town perceives the employee is abusing sick leave or has used an excessive amount of sick leave. The Town may require medical verification of an employee’s absence to verify that the employee is able to return to work with or without restrictions.

  • Identity Verification In the case that the Subscriber provides telecommunication services to any Subscriber’s Customers pursuant to Section 8.1, the Subscriber is responsible for performing and shall perform personal identification of Subscriber’s Customer. SORACOM shall not bear any responsibility in relation to dealing with such matters.

  • Third Party Verification 4.8.1 The SPD shall be further required to provide entry to the site of the Power Project (from which power under this Agreement is being made available) free of all encumbrances at all times during the Term of the Agreement to SECI and a third Party nominated by any Indian Governmental Instrumentality for inspection and verification of the works being carried out by the SPD at the site of the Power Project. The SPD shall provide full support to SECI and/or the third party in this regard. 4.8.2 The third party may verify the construction works/operation of the Project being carried out by the SPD and if it is found that the construction works/operation of the Power Project is not as per the Prudent Utility Practices, it may seek clarifications from SPD or require the works to be stopped or to comply with the instructions of such third party.

  • Seniority Verification Process i. The new school district shall provide the employee with the necessary verification form at the time the employee achieves continuing contract status. ii. The employee must initiate the seniority verification process and forward the necessary verification forms to the previous school district(s) within ninety (90) days of receiving a continuing appointment in the new school district. iii. The previous school district(s) shall make every reasonable effort to retrieve and verify the seniority credits which the employee seeks to port.