Common use of School Concurrency Process Clause in Contracts

School Concurrency Process. 1. Review Process a) The County, the Cities and the School Board shall ensure that the minimum Level of Service Standard established for each school type is maintained. No new residential rezoning, preliminary plat, site plan or functional equivalent may be approved by the County or Cities, unless the residential development is exempt from these requirements as provided in Section 13.6 of this Agreement, until a School Concurrency Reservation Letter has been issued by the School Board indicating that adequate school facilities exist. This shall not limit the authority of a local government to deny a development permit or its functional equivalent, pursuant to its home rule regulatory powers. b) Any developer submitting a development permit application (such as a rezoning, site plan or preliminary plat) with a residential component that is not exempt under Section 13.6 of this Agreement is subject to school concurrency and must prepare and submit a School Impact Analysis to the local government, as applicable, for review by the School Board. The School Impact Analysis must indicate the location of the development, number of dwelling units and unit types (single-family, multi-family, apartments, etc.), a phasing schedule (if applicable), and age restrictions for occupancy (if any). The local government shall initiate the review by determining that the application is sufficient for processing. Upon determination of application sufficiency, the local government shall transmit the School Impact Analysis to the School Board representative for review. The School Board representative will verify whether sufficient student stations for each type of school are available or not available to support the development. A flow chart outlining the school concurrency review process is included as Appendix “D”. The process is as follows: 1) The School Board representative shall review the School Impact Analysis for residential developments which have been submitted and deemed sufficient for processing by the applicable local government. 2) The School Board representative shall review each School Impact Analysis in the order in which it is received and shall issue a School Concurrency Reservation Letter to the applicant and the affected local government within thirty (30) working days of receipt of the application. 3) The School Board may charge the applicant a non-refundable application fee payable to the School Board to meet the cost of review. c) In the event that there is not adequate capacity available in the SCSA in which the proposed development is located or in an adjacent SCSA to support the development, the School Board shall entertain proportionate share mitigation options pursuant to Section 14.7 of this Agreement. If the proposed mitigation is accepted, the School Board shall enter into an enforceable and binding agreement with the affected local government and the developer pursuant to Section 14.7 of this Agreement. d) The local government shall be responsible for notifying the School Board representative when a residential development has received a Concurrency Reservation Certificate (CRC), when the development order for the residential development expires or is revoked, and when its school impact fees have been paid. 2. Student Generation Calculation a) To determine a proposed development’s projected students, the proposed development’s projected number and type of residential units shall be converted into projected students for all schools of each type within the specific SCSA using the School Board Student Generation Multiplier, as established in Appendix “C.”

Appears in 3 contracts

Sources: Interlocal Agreement, Interlocal Agreement, Interlocal Agreement

School Concurrency Process. 1. Review Process a) The County, the Cities Local Governments and the School Board shall ensure that the minimum Level of Service Standard established for each school type is maintained. No new residential rezoning, preliminary plat, final plat or site plan or functional equivalent may be approved by the County or CitiesLocal Governments, unless the residential development is exempt from these requirements as provided in Section 13.6 of this Agreement, or until a School Concurrency Reservation Letter has been issued by the School Board indicating that adequate school facilities exist. This shall not limit the authority of a local government to deny a development permit or its functional equivalent, pursuant to its home rule regulatory powers. b) Any developer submitting a final development permit application (such as a rezoning, site plan or preliminary final plat) with a residential component that is not exempt under Section 13.6 of this Agreement is subject to school concurrency and must prepare and submit a School Impact Analysis Concurrency Application to the local government, as applicable, for review by the School Board. The School Impact Analysis Concurrency Application must indicate the location of the development, number of dwelling units and unit types (single-single- family, multi-family, apartments, etc.), a phasing schedule (if applicable), and age restrictions for occupancy (if any). The local government shall initiate the review by determining that the application is sufficient for processing. Upon determination of application sufficiency, the local government shall transmit the School Impact Analysis Concurrency Application to the School Board representative for review. The School Board representative will verify shall be solely responsible for verifying whether sufficient student stations for each type of school are available or not available to support the development. A flow chart outlining the school concurrency review process is included as Appendix “D”. The process is as follows: 1) The School Board representative shall review the School Impact Analysis Concurrency Application for residential developments which have been submitted and deemed sufficient for processing by the applicable local government. 2) The School Board representative shall review each School Impact Analysis Concurrency Application in the order in which it is received by the School Board and shall issue either a School Concurrency Reservation or Deficiency Letter to the applicant and the affected local government within thirty (30) working calendar days of receipt of the application. 3) The School Board may charge the applicant a non-refundable application fee payable to the School Board to meet the cost of review. c) In the event that there is not adequate capacity available in the SCSA in which the proposed development is located or in an adjacent SCSA to support the development, the School Board shall entertain proportionate share mitigation options pursuant to Section 14.7 of this Agreement. If the proposed mitigation is accepted, the School Board shall enter into an enforceable and binding agreement with the affected local government and the developer pursuant to Section 14.7 of this Agreement. d) The local government shall be responsible for notifying the School Board representative when a residential development has received a Concurrency Reservation Certificate (CRC), when the development order for the residential development expires or is revoked. In cases of expiration or revocation, and when its school impact fees have been paidthe existing SCRL is forfeited. 2. Student Generation Calculation a) To determine a proposed development’s projected students, the proposed development’s projected number and type of residential units shall be converted into projected students for all schools of each type within the specific SCSA using the School Board Student Generation Multiplier, as established in Appendix “C.” The student generation rates shall be determined by the School Board and adopted into the Educational Facilities Plan. The student generation rates shall be updated at least every 2 years.

Appears in 1 contract

Sources: Interlocal Agreement

School Concurrency Process. 1. Review Process a) The County, the Cities Local Governments and the School Board shall ensure that the minimum Level of Service Standard established for each school type is maintained. No new residential rezoning, preliminary plat, final plat or site plan or functional equivalent may be approved by the County or CitiesLocal Governments, unless the residential development is exempt from these requirements as provided in Section 13.6 of this Agreement, or until a School Concurrency Reservation Letter has been issued by the School Board indicating that adequate school facilities exist. This shall not limit the authority of a local government to deny a development permit or its functional equivalent, pursuant to its home rule regulatory powers. b) Any developer submitting a final development permit application (such as a rezoning, site plan or preliminary final plat) with a residential component that is not exempt under Section 13.6 of this Agreement is subject to school concurrency and must prepare and submit a School Impact Analysis Concurrency Application to the local government, as applicable, for review by the School Board. The School Impact Analysis Concurrency Application must indicate the location of the development, number of dwelling units and unit types (single-family, multi-family, apartments, etc.), a phasing schedule (if applicable), and age restrictions for occupancy (if any). The local government shall initiate the review by determining that the application is sufficient for processing. Upon determination of application sufficiency, the local government shall transmit the School Impact Analysis Concurrency Application to the School Board representative for review. The School Board representative will verify shall be solely responsible for verifying whether sufficient student stations for each type of school are available or not available to support the development. A flow chart outlining the school concurrency review process is included as Appendix “D”. The process is as follows: 1) The School Board representative shall review the School Impact Analysis Concurrency Application for residential developments which have been submitted and deemed sufficient for processing by the applicable local government. 2) The School Board representative shall review each School Impact Analysis Concurrency Application in the order in which it is received and shall issue either a School Concurrency Reservation or Deficiency Letter to the applicant and the affected local government within thirty (30) working calendar days of receipt of the application. 3) The School Board may charge the applicant a non-refundable application fee payable to the School Board to meet the cost of review. c) In the event that there is not adequate capacity available in the SCSA in which the proposed development is located or in an adjacent SCSA to support the development, the School Board shall entertain proportionate share mitigation options pursuant to Section 14.7 of this Agreement. If the proposed mitigation is accepted, the School Board shall enter into an enforceable and binding agreement with the affected local government and the developer pursuant to Section 14.7 of this Agreement. d) The local government shall be responsible for notifying the School Board representative when a residential development has received a Concurrency Reservation Certificate (CRC), when the development order for the residential development expires or is revoked, and when its school impact fees have been paid. 2. Student Generation Calculation a) To determine a proposed development’s projected students, the proposed development’s projected number and type of residential units shall be converted into projected students for all schools of each type within the specific SCSA using the School Board Student Generation Multiplier, as established in Appendix “C.”

Appears in 1 contract

Sources: Interlocal Agreement