SELECTION AND AWARD Sample Clauses

The 'Selection and Award' clause defines the process by which a party, typically an owner or client, chooses a contractor, supplier, or service provider from among competing proposals or bids. This clause outlines the criteria for evaluation, such as price, technical capability, and compliance with requirements, and describes the steps leading to the final contract award. Its core function is to ensure a transparent, fair, and systematic method for selecting the most suitable candidate, thereby reducing disputes and promoting confidence in the procurement process.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
SELECTION AND AWARD. The City of Columbia Community Development Department shall determine eligibility of proposals and certify organizational eligibility to be designated as a Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO). The Community Development Commission will provide funding recommendations to the City Council for final consideration. The CDC’s rating sheet can be viewed on the following page.
View Source
SELECTION AND AWARD. 1. The final decision regarding the award of the Master Price Agreements will be made by the Sourcing Team, and the award of Participating Addenda will be made by each participating state, independently. 2. Notification of the contract awards will be made in writing.
View SourceView Similar (4)
SELECTION AND AWARD. 13.1 Bidders are cautioned to submit enough information to enable the evaluation committee to fully ascertain each Bidder’s capability to do all the requirements of this contract. Cover each item in sufficient detail to clearly address the required information. This should preclude a Proposal from being returned as incomplete or rejected because a required topic was not addressed. 13.2 All commitments made by a Bidder in their Proposal will become part of the resultant contract. Submitted data should be complete and concise, but not overly elaborate. 13.3 Excessive reliance on promotional brochures is discouraged. 13.4 Bidders are advised their Proposal is presumed to represent their best efforts to respond to this solicitation. Apparent inconsistencies between promised performance and their proposed Pricing shall be fully explained by the Bidder. 13.5 The burden of proof of financial and price credibility rests solely on the Bidder. Any significant inconsistency, if explained, raises a fundamental issue of the Bidder’s understanding of the project management and resources required and/or their ability to perform the contract. This may be grounds for rejection of their Proposal, or basis for determination of non-responsibility. 13.6 Bidders may, at the discretion of the ODR, be asked to provide more information and/or clarifications regarding their Proposals. 13.7 The Bidder shall be held responsible for the validity of all information supplied in their Proposal. Title page of Proposal shall contain the following statement: “The information contained in this Proposal is accurate and true to the best of my knowledge.” 13.8 In no case shall words like “we will comply with the requirements of the contract” or equivalent statements be acceptable in meeting the requirements of this solicitation. 13.9 Failure to comply with all the requirements of this solicitation may result in ▇▇▇▇▇▇’s Proposal being summarily rejected. 13.10 Award of the Contract resulting from this solicitation shall be under the source selection procedures described herein. A committee of qualified personnel will evaluate each Proposal submitted in response to this solicitation. Weights will be assigned to the three (3) categories of primary importance, and the decision of the ODR regarding assignment of weights will be final. The categories of primary importance are as follows: A. Project Management Ability, 30% B. Company Experience in Higher Education, 35% C. Price Proposal, 35% 13.11 Fo...
View SourceView Similar (3)
SELECTION AND AWARD. Meet with the City to review rankings and make the selection. Provide the City with a recommendation for award and prepare a notice of intent to award letter for distribution by the City.
View Source
SELECTION AND AWARD. Quotes must demonstrate a clear understanding of the nature and scope of the work required. Failure to provide a realistic, reasonable and complete quote may reflect a lack of understanding of the requirements and may result in a determination that the vendor is technically unacceptable. Generally speaking, generic information may receive a lower rating than information well tailored to the selection factors. Technical Quotations are weighted as such: 50% for past performance, 25% for technical capability and capacity, and 25% for key personnel. The technical factors, when combined, are more important than price. Price will be considered and evaluated in determining the overall best value to the Government. As the technical merits of the quotes become more equal, price may become the determining factor. A single award BPA will be established with the responsible contractor whose quote conforms to the requirements outlined in this RFP and is most advantageous to the Government based on the best value determination. This section provides instructions on how to prepare and submit a quotation in response to this solicitation.
View Source
SELECTION AND AWARD. If the Town is unable to reach an agreement with the first-ranked Contractor, the Town shall terminate further discussions with the first-ranked Contractor, and commence negotiations with the next-ranked Contractor, in the order of the selection ranking until an agreement is reached, or all Proposals are rejected. Time is of the essence, and the award of the contract to the successful Contractor is expressly conditioned upon (1) the Contractor’s execution and delivery of the Contract, and delivery of all required bonds and evidence of insurance, within ten (10) calendar days after the Contractor is notified of the acceptance of its Proposal, and (ii) the Contractor’s timely fulfillment of any and all other preconditions expressly set forth in the Contract Documents. Should the Contractor fail to timely execute and deliver the contract, required bonds, evidence of insurance, or fail to timely fulfill any other such preconditions, the Town may, at its option and discretion, without releasing, impairing or affecting its right to receive the Proposal security as damages for such failure, rescind the award, commence negotiations with the next ranked Contractor, or may reject all Proposals. There will be no contractual obligation on the part of the Town to any Contractor, nor will any firm have any property interest or other right in the contract or work being proposed, unless and until the Agreement is unconditionally executed and delivered by all parties, all submittals required by the Proposal Documents and Agreement and all conditions to be fulfilled by the selected firm have either been so fulfilled by the firm, or waived in writing by the firm or Town, as applicable.
View Source
SELECTION AND AWARD. The City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals in its absolute discretion. All proposals are subject to the laws of the State of Indiana.
View Source
SELECTION AND AWARD. The City of Columbia reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to negotiate with any offeror considered qualified, or to make an award without further discussion. The City of Columbia reserves the right to award contracts to multiple vendors if deemed in the best interest of the City of Columbia. PROPOSAL Executive Recruitment Services for City Manager Due Date: December 12, 2018 SUBMITTED BY: ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ CPS HR Consulting ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ P: ▇▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇ Tax ID: ▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇ Your Path to Performance December 12, 2018 Finance /Purchasing Division ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, CPPB City of Columbia ▇▇▇ ▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, 5th Floor Columbia, MO 65201 Dear ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇: CPS HR Consulting (CPS HR) is pleased to have the opportunity to submit a proposal to assist the City of Columbia (City) with the recruitment of a new City Manager. We are uniquely qualified to undertake this effort as we have vast experience in assisting public agencies with executive search, screening, and placement. We understand that each agency is unique, and our extensive experience allows us to tailor our process to specifically meet your needs. Our work with local government agencies throughout the United States gives us an in-depth understanding of government operations, programs, and services. Each recruitment is an opportunity to shape and prepare your organization for the future. We understand how important this transition is for you and are perfectly placed to assist you in this endeavor. Mr. ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ will serve as project manager for this engagement. He has practical experience as a City Manager and Deputy County Administrator, and extensive recruiting experience. His recent clients have included the Town of Paradise Valley, AZ and the City of University City, MO. It is our commitment to work in partnership with your organization to a successful result. Thank you for the opportunity to be considered for this assignment. This proposal is valid for a period of 90 days from the submittal due date of December 12, 2018. Should you have questions or comments about the information presented in this proposal, please contact ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ at ▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇ or (▇▇▇) ▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇. Sincerely, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Senior Practice Leader, Products and Services Executive Summary 1 Recruitment Experts 1 Agency Information 3 About CPS HR 3 Primary Contact Person 4 Executive Recruitment Team 4 Current Recruitments Status 6 References 7 Methodology 8 Key Stakeh...
View Source
SELECTION AND AWARD. Quotes must demonstrate a clear understanding of the nature and scope of the work required. Failure to provide a realistic, reasonable and complete quote may reflect a lack of understanding of the requirements and may result in a determination that the vendor is technically unacceptable. Generally speaking, generic information may receive a lower rating than information well tailored to the selection factors. Technical Quotations are weighted as such: 50% for past performance, 25% for technical capability and capacity, and 25% for key personnel. The technical factors, when combined, are more important than price. Price will be considered and evaluated in determining the overall best value to the Government. As the technical merits of the quotes become more equal, price may become the determining factor. A single award BPA will be established with the responsible contractor whose quote conforms to the requirements outlined in this RFP and is most advantageous to the Government based on the best value determination.
View Source

Related to SELECTION AND AWARD

  • BID EVALUATION AND AWARD 13.1 The electronic signature shall be considered an offer on the part of the Bidder. Such offer shall be deemed accepted upon issuance by the Owners of purchase orders, contract award notifications, or other contract documents appropriate to the work. 13.2 No bid shall be modified or withdrawn for a period of ninety (90) calendar days after the time and date established for receiving bids, and each Bidder so agrees in submitting the bid. 13.3 In case of a discrepancy between the unit prices and their extensions, the unit prices shall govern. 13.4 The bid will be awarded to the lowest responsible, responsive Bidder whose bid will be most advantageous to the Owners, and as the Owners deem will best serve the requirements and interests of the Owners. 13.5 The Owners reserves the right to accept or reject any or all bids; to request rebids; to award bids item-by-item, with or without alternates, by groups, or "lump sum"; to waive minor irregularities in bids; such as shall best serve the requirements and interests of the Owners. 13.6 In order to determine if the Bidder has the experience, qualifications, resources and necessary attributes to provide the quality workmanship, materials and management required by the plans and specifications, the Bidder may be required to complete and submit additional information as deemed necessary by the Owners. Failure to provide the information requested to make this determination may be grounds for a declaration of non-responsive with respect to the Bidder. 13.7 The Owners reserves the right to reject irregular bids that contain unauthorized additions, conditions, alternate bids, or irregularities that make the Bid Proposal incomplete, indefinite or ambiguous. 13.8 Any governmental agency may piggyback on any contract entered into from this bid.

  • Compensation and Method of Payment Subject to any limitations set forth below or elsewhere in this Agreement, District agrees to pay Consultant the amounts specified in Exhibit B “Compensation”. The total compensation, including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed Three Thousand Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($3,250.00), unless additional compensation is approved in writing by the District. a. Each month Consultant shall furnish to District an original invoice for all work performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month. The invoice shall detail charges by the following categories: labor (by sub-category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and sub-consultant contracts. Sub-consultant charges, if any, shall be detailed by the following categories: labor, travel, materials, equipment and supplies. District shall independently review each invoice submitted by the Consultant to determine whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. In the event that no charges or expenses are disputed, the invoice shall be approved and paid according to the terms set forth in subsection b. In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by District, the original invoice shall be returned by District to Consultant for correction and resubmission. b. Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Consultant which are disputed by District, District will use its best efforts to cause Consultant to be paid within forty-five (45) days of receipt of Consultant’s correct and undisputed invoice. c. Payment to Consultant for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Consultant.

  • Compensation of the Administrator For the services to be rendered by the Administrator as provided in Section 2 of this Agreement, the Portfolio shall pay to the Administrator, at the end of each month, a fee equal to one-twelfth of 0.15 percent of the net assets of the Portfolio. If this Agreement is terminated prior to the end of any month, the fee for such month shall be prorated.

  • Awards 1. The disputing parties may agree on a resolution of the dispute at any time before the tribunal issues its final award. 2. Where a tribunal makes a final award against either of the disputing parties, the tribunal may award, separately or in combination, only: (a) monetary damages and any applicable interest; and (b) restitution of property, in which case the award shall provide that the disputing Member State may pay monetary damages and any applicable interest in lieu of restitution. 3. A tribunal may also award costs and attorneys fees in accordance with this Agreement and the applicable arbitration rules. 4. A tribunal may not award punitive damages. 5. An award made by a tribunal shall have no binding force except between the disputing parties and in respect of the particular case. 6. Subject to paragraph 7 and the applicable review procedure for an interim award, the disputing party shall abide by and comply with an award without delay. (15) 7. The disputing party may not seek enforcement of a final award until: (a) in the case of a final award under the ICSID Convention: (i) 120 days has elapsed from the date the award was rendered and no disputing party has requested revision or annulment of the award; or (ii) revision or annulment proceedings have been completed; (b) in the case of a final award under the ICSID Additional Facility Rules, the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, or the rules selected pursuant to Article 33(1)(e): (i) 90 days have elapsed from the date the award was rendered and no disputing party has commenced a proceeding to revise, set aside, or annul the award; or (ii) a court has dismissed or allowed an application to revise, set aside, or annul the award and there is no further appeal. 8. A claim that is submitted for arbitration under this Section shall be considered to arise out of a commercial relationship or transaction for purposes of Article 1 of the New York Convention. 9. Each Member State shall provide for the enforcement of an award in its territory.

  • Service Awards In consideration of the provision of services, COMPANY to pay EMPLOYEE, as compensation; The gross amount of RMB annually calculated at the rate of twelve (12) equal monthly installments consecutively of RMB each.