Service Facilitators - Criteria Sample Clauses

The 'Service Facilitators - Criteria' clause defines the qualifications, standards, or requirements that individuals or entities must meet to act as service facilitators under the agreement. Typically, this clause outlines necessary certifications, experience levels, or compliance with specific regulations that facilitators must demonstrate before being engaged. By establishing clear criteria, the clause ensures that only competent and suitable facilitators are selected, thereby maintaining service quality and reducing the risk of inadequate performance.
Service Facilitators - Criteria. 7.1.1 Redistributors can appoint Service Facilitators to sell and/or deliver Data in a closed user group environment. Any such client is required to sign a Service Facilitator Application before approval is granted and the following criteria must be met: a) It is the Redistributor, and never the Service Facilitator, who contracts directly to supply the Data to the End Customer; b) The Redistributor must provide upon request all End Customer records; c) The Redistributors’ contract to supply the Data to the End Customer must be in place prior to any Data enablement; d) The Service Facilitator does not database, add to, subtract from, or modify the Data; e) Individual Unique User Id/Device Data entitlements must be allocated by the Redistributor and not the Service Facilitator; f) The Redistributor is responsible for all Data reporting; g) The Service Facilitator is forbidden in its contract with the Redistributor from providing Data to any clients who are not clients of the Redistributor (other than as an approved Service Facilitator for other Redistributors or as a Redistributor in its own right); h) The Service Facilitator, in its contract with the Redistributor, agrees to the same terms as the Redistributor in respect of market data audits; i) Where the Brand on the data product is solely that of the Redistributor, and all the above criteria are met, no Redistribution Licence Charges are applicable to the Service Facilitator; j) Where the Brand on the data product is not solely that of the Redistributor, and all the above criteria except for point i) are met: Service Facilitator Redistribution Licenses are applicable for real time Data redistribution as per Schedule B, 1.8 -1.9 and 6.9 - 6.10 - 6.11 for each additional Brand. For the avoidance of doubt only one Service Facilitator Redistribution licence will be required for each data product. In case of delayed and/or After Midnight Data redistribution, Delayed Data or After Midnight Redistribution Licences are applicable as per Schedule B (for further information please refer to Schedule A, 5.4). 7.1.2 If a Service Facilitator delivers a datafeed to an End Customer on behalf of the Redistributor, it is still the responsibility of the Redistributor to acquire monthly honesty declarations from each End Customer; the Redistributor is ultimately liable in the event that their appointed Service Facilitator(s) fail to meet any of the above criteria. 7.1.3 The Exchanges reserve the right to refuse to grant app...
View SourceView Similar (14)
Service Facilitators - Criteria. 7.1.1 Redistributors can appoint Service Facilitators to sell and/or deliver Data in a closed user group environment. Any such client is required to sign a Service Facilitator Application before approval is granted and the following criteria must be met: 7.1.2 If a Service Facilitator delivers a datafeed to an End Customer on behalf of the Redistributor, it is still the responsibility of the Redistributor to acquire monthly honesty declarations from each End Customer; the Redistributor is ultimately liable in the event that their appointed Service Facilitator(s) fail to meet any of the above criteria. 7.1.3 BIT reserves the right to refuse to grant approval if they believe the Service Facilitator does not satisfactorily fulfil the above criteria.
View Source

Related to Service Facilitators - Criteria

  • Selection Criteria Each Contract is secured by a new or used Motorcycle. No Contract has a Contract Rate less than 1.00%. Each Contract amortizes the amount financed over an original term no greater than 84 months (excluding periods of deferral of first payment). Each Contract has a Principal Balance of at least $500.00 as of the Cutoff Date.

  • General Criteria (a) If general criteria are required as part of the Application, only one (1) set shall be completed. General criteria measure the quality of the Land Manager’s overall OHV program. The Applicants shall answer these questions with respect to the entirety of the OHV operation, including all trails and areas available for OHV Recreation, not just specific Projects or Project Areas. (b) General criteria include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) OHV Opportunity and services provided, (2) Agency contribution to the overall cost of managing and delivering the OHV Opportunity, (3) Management of natural and Cultural Resources, (4) Effective education of rules/regulations, and (5) Past performance in completing and administering ▇▇▇▇▇ funded Projects. (c) Non-land manager Applicants required to complete the general criteria shall cooperate with the Land Manager(s) to obtain the information necessary to complete the general criteria section of the Application. Note: Authority cited: Sections 5001.5 and 5003, Public Resources Code. Reference: Sections 5024.1, 5090.32 and 5090.50, Public Resources Code.

  • Criteria (1) Annual Evaluation Criteria. All performance evaluations shall be based upon assigned duties, and shall carefully consider the nature of the assignment in terms, where applicable, of: a. Teaching effectiveness, including effectiveness in presenting knowledge, information, and ideas by means or methods such as lecture, discussion, assignment and recitation, demonstration, laboratory exercise, practical experience, supervision of interns, theses, professional projects and/or dissertations, and direct consultation with students. The evaluation shall include consideration of effectiveness in imparting knowledge and skills, and effectiveness in stimulating students' critical thinking and/or creative abilities, the development or revision of curriculum and course structure, and adherence to accepted standards of professional behavior in meeting responsibilities to students. The evaluator may take into account class notes, syllabi, student exams and assignments, and any other materials relevant to the employee's teaching assignment. The teaching evaluation must take into account any relevant materials submitted by the employee, including the results of peer evaluations of teaching, and may not be based solely on student evaluations when this additional information has been made available to the evaluator. b. Contribution to the discovery of new knowledge, development of new educational techniques, and other forms of creative activity. Evidence of research and other creative activity shall include, but not be limited to, published books; articles and papers in professional journals; musical compositions, paintings, sculpture; works of performing art; papers presented at meetings of professional societies; funded grant activities; and research and creative accomplishments that have not yet resulted in publication, display, or performance. The evaluation shall include consideration of the employee's productivity, including the quality and quantity of the employee's research and other creative programs and contributions during the year, as well as recognition by the academic or professional community of what has been done. c. Public service that extends professional or discipline-related contributions to the community, the State, public schools, and/or the national and international community. This public service includes contributions to scholarly and professional organizations, governmental boards, agencies, and commissions that are beneficial to such groups and individuals. d. Participation in the governance processes of the University through significant service on committees, councils, and senates, beyond that associated with the expected responsibility to participate in the governance of the University through participation in regular departmental or college meetings. e. Other assigned University duties, such as attending University events, advising, counseling, and academic administration, or as described in a Position Description, if any, of the position held by the employee. Other assigned duties may include entrepreneurial activities that contribute to the further development of the University with an end result of creating a new venture. Evidence of entrepreneurial contributions shall include, but not be limited to, creation of self- supporting centers or institutes, development of multi- disciplinary research partnerships, and applications of research to implementations in society. To provide guidelines for the establishment, maintenance and use of employee evaluation files within the employee’s respective academic unit.

  • Claims Review Methodology ‌‌ a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject‌‌ to the Quarterly Claims Review.

  • Program Objectives Implement a rigorous constructability program following The University of Texas System, Office of Capital Projects Constructability Manual. Identify and document Project cost and schedule savings (targeted costs are 5% of construction costs). Clarification of Project goals, objectives.