SIGNATORIES AND EFFECTIVE DATE. We, the undersigned, pledge our support for the continued success of the PPG XL Project XL and the furtherance of an effective partnership between EPA and PPG. United States Environmental Protection Agency OPPTS ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇. Vice President Environment, Health & Safety PPG Industries, Inc. The PPG XL Project enjoys the support of a broad range of public and private organizations and individuals. The Project incorporates both public/private and local partnerships and will serve as an example that will benefit the economy, the community, and the environment. Our signatures below express our support for this Project and the contribution it will make to the environment and the community. ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Director Coatings R&D PPG Industries, Inc. ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Director Chemicals R&D PPG Industries, Inc. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇’▇▇▇▇▇▇ Director Office of Environmental Innovation Region III U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Deputy Secretary Office of Pollution Prevention and Compliance Assistance Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection EPI Suite* Melting and Boiling Points, Vapor Pressure CAS RN or Chemical Structure in SMILES notation These methods were developed by Syracuse Research Corporation (SRC). Some methods were developed under contract to US EPA, OPPT in support of Section 5 of TSCA. EPIWIN is available from SRC, Syracuse, N.Y. Octanol / water partition coefficient Water solubility from log Kow Soil organic carbon partition coefficient ▇▇▇▇▇’▇ law constant: VP/WS Bioconcentration factor EPI Suite* Atmospheric oxidation potential CAS RN or Chemical Structure in SMILES notation These methods were developed by SRC. Some methods were developed under contract to US EPA, OPPT in support of Sec. 5 of TSCA. EPIWIN is available from SRC, Syracuse, N.Y. Biodegradation rate Hydrolysis rate Percent removal in POTW OncoLogic Cancer hazard potential Chemical structure Developed by LogiChem under a cooperative agreement with USEPA, OPPT in support of Sec. 5 of TSCA. OncoLogic is available from LogiChem Inc., Boyertown, PA. ECOSAR* Aquatic toxicity to fish, invertebrates, algae CAS RN or Chemical Structure in SMILES notation Download at no cost from ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇▇/oppt/newchems /21ecosar.htm E-FAST Surface water ingestion, fish ingestion, ground water ingestion, ambient air inhalation, indoor air inhalation, dermal exposure, aquatic environment exposure/risk Physical / chemical properties, fate properties, release amounts, release medium, release location, aquatic concentration of concern, NPDES number Download at no cost from ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇▇/opptintr/expos ure ReachScan Impact of surface water discharges on drinking water facilities, i.e., chemical concentration downstream at drinking water intake point Facility location (NPDES number), release data Contact ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ at ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇.▇▇▇ for a free copy Occupational Exposure Spreadsheets^ Vapor generation rates and worker exposure to vapors during filling, sampling, and to open liquid pools; and during degreasing operations; Water releases and worker exposures to powders during textile dyeing Molecular weight, vapor pressure, operation hrs/day, worker exposure hrs/day; if applicable, volume of degreasing solvent or dye used, dye exhaustion rate Contact ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ at ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇.▇▇▇ for a free copy ^ “ChemSTEER,” a comprehensive Windows®-based tool containing methods from these spreadsheets and many other methods for estimating workplace exposures and environmental releases from industrial and commercial operations, is currently under development. July 2000 DISCLAIMERS: Mention of trade names or commercial products, or services does not convey, and should not be interpreted as conveying official USEPA approval, endorsement, or recommendation. The models presented in OPPT’s P2 Framework have been developed over a period of more than 20 years by OPPT, EPA contractors and/or grantees or others in the scientific and technical community, to screen chemicals in the absence of data. Through the P2 Framework, OPPT is presenting these screening models to industry and other stakeholders in the hopes that use of these models early in the research and development process will result in safer chemicals entering commerce. The P2 Framework models should be used for priority setting and to provide additional information so that choices can be made on the chemicals being evaluated. Other chemical screening methodologies have been developed and are in use by chemical companies and other stakeholders. The Agency recognizes that other models are available and that these models can also be of value in chemical screening efforts. CAUTION: Screening models predict data with an inherent degree of uncertainty, and should never be used to replace measured data from well designed studies. Measured data are always preferred over predicted data. If measured data are not available, measured data on close analogs can be used. If no analog data are available, screening level models, such as those in the P2 Framework, may be used for priority setting and to predict values that can be used to indicate which chemicals may need further testing or evaluation.
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Final Project Agreement
SIGNATORIES AND EFFECTIVE DATE. We, the undersigned, pledge our support for the continued success of the PPG XL Project XL and the furtherance of an effective partnership between EPA and PPG. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ Director Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics United States Environmental Protection Agency OPPTS ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇. Vice President Environment, Health & Safety PPG Industries, Inc. The PPG XL Project enjoys the support of a broad range of public and private organizations and individuals. The Project incorporates both public/private and local partnerships and will serve as an example that will benefit the economy, the community, and the environment. Our signatures below express our support for this Project and the contribution it will make to the environment and the community. ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Director Coatings R&D PPG Industries, Inc. ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Director Chemicals R&D PPG Industries, Inc. ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Deputy Associate Administrator Office of Policy, Economics and Innovation ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇’▇▇▇▇▇▇ Director Office of Environmental Innovation Region III U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Deputy Secretary Office of Pollution Prevention and Compliance Assistance Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection EPI Suite* Melting and Boiling Points, Vapor Pressure CAS RN or Chemical Structure in SMILES notation These methods were developed by Syracuse Research Corporation (SRC). Some methods were developed under contract to US EPA, OPPT in support of Section 5 of TSCA. EPIWIN is available from SRC, Syracuse, N.Y. Octanol / water partition coefficient Water solubility from log Kow Soil organic carbon partition coefficient ▇▇▇▇▇’▇ law constant: VP/WS Bioconcentration factor EPI Suite* Atmospheric oxidation potential CAS RN or Chemical Structure in SMILES notation These methods were developed by SRC. Some methods were developed under contract to US EPA, OPPT in support of Sec. 5 of TSCA. EPIWIN is available from SRC, Syracuse, N.Y. Biodegradation rate Hydrolysis rate Percent removal in POTW OncoLogic Cancer hazard potential Chemical structure Developed by LogiChem under a cooperative agreement with USEPA, OPPT in support of Sec. 5 of TSCA. OncoLogic is available from LogiChem Inc., Boyertown, PA. ECOSAR* Aquatic toxicity to fish, invertebrates, algae CAS RN or Chemical Structure in SMILES notation Download at no cost from ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇▇/oppt/newchems /21ecosar.htm newche ms/21ecosar.htm E-FAST Surface water ingestion, fish ingestion, ground water ingestion, ambient air inhalation, indoor air inhalation, dermal exposure, aquatic environment exposure/risk Physical / chemical properties, fate properties, release amounts, release medium, release location, aquatic concentration of concern, NPDES number Download at no cost from ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇▇/opptintr/expos ure expo sure ReachScan Impact of surface water discharges on drinking water facilities, i.e., chemical concentration downstream at drinking water intake point Facility location (NPDES number), release data Contact ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ at ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇.▇▇▇ for a free copy Occupational Exposure Spreadsheets^ Vapor generation rates and worker exposure to vapors during filling, sampling, and to open liquid pools; and during degreasing operations; Water releases and worker exposures to powders during textile dyeing Molecular weight, vapor pressure, operation hrs/day, worker exposure hrs/day; if applicable, volume of degreasing solvent or dye used, dye exhaustion rate Contact ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ at ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇.▇▇▇ for a free copy ^ “ChemSTEER,” a comprehensive Windows®-based tool containing methods from these spreadsheets and many other methods for estimating workplace exposures and environmental releases from industrial and commercial operations, is currently under development. July 2000 DISCLAIMERS: Mention of trade names or commercial products, or services does not convey, and should not be interpreted as conveying official USEPA approval, endorsement, or recommendation. The models presented in OPPT’s P2 Framework have been developed over a period of more than 20 years by OPPT, EPA contractors and/or grantees or others in the scientific and technical community, to screen chemicals in the absence of data. Through the P2 Framework, OPPT is presenting these screening models to industry and other stakeholders in the hopes that use of these models early in the research and development process will result in safer chemicals entering commerce. The P2 Framework models should be used for priority setting and to provide additional information so that choices can be made on the chemicals being evaluated. Other chemical screening methodologies have been developed and are in use by chemical companies and other stakeholders. The Agency recognizes that other models are available and that these models can also be of value in chemical screening efforts. CAUTION: Screening models predict data with an inherent degree of uncertainty, and should never be used to replace measured data from well designed studies. Measured data are always preferred over predicted data. If measured data are not available, measured data on close analogs can be used. If no analog data are available, screening level models, such as those in the P2 Framework, may be used for priority setting and to predict values that can be used to indicate which chemicals may need further testing or evaluation.
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Final Project Agreement
SIGNATORIES AND EFFECTIVE DATE. We, the undersigned, pledge our support for the continued success of the PPG XL Kodak Pollution Prevention Project XL and the furtherance of an effective partnership between EPA and PPG. United States Environmental Protection Agency OPPTS ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇Kodak Company. Vice President Environment, Health & Safety PPG Industries, Inc. The PPG XL Project enjoys the support of a broad range of public and private organizations and individuals. The Project incorporates both public/private and local partnerships and will serve as an example that will benefit the economy, the community, and the environment. Our signatures below express our support for this Project and the contribution it will make to the environment and the community. ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Director Coatings R&D PPG Industries, Inc. ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ EPA Assistant Administrator, Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Date ▇. ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, Director Chemicals R&D PPG IndustriesDirector, Inc. Health, Safety and Environment Vice President ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇’▇▇▇▇▇▇ Director Office of Environmental Innovation Region III U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Deputy Secretary Office of Pollution Prevention and Compliance Assistance Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Kodak Company Date EPI Suite* Melting and Boiling Points, Vapor Pressure CAS RN or Chemical Structure in SMILES notation These methods were developed by Syracuse Research Corporation (SRC). Some methods were developed under contract to US EPA, OPPT in support of Section 5 of TSCA. EPIWIN is available from SRC, Syracuse, N.Y. Octanol / water partition coefficient Water solubility from log Kow Soil organic carbon partition coefficient ▇▇▇▇▇’▇ law constant: VP/WS Bioconcentration factor EPI Suite* Atmospheric oxidation potential CAS RN or Chemical Structure in SMILES notation These methods were developed by SRC. Some methods were developed under contract to US EPA, OPPT in support of Sec. 5 of TSCA. EPIWIN is available from SRC, Syracuse, N.Y. Biodegradation rate Hydrolysis rate Percent removal in POTW OncoLogic Cancer hazard potential Chemical structure Developed by LogiChem under a cooperative agreement with USEPA, OPPT in support of Sec. 5 of TSCA. OncoLogic is available from LogiChem Inc., Boyertown, PA. ECOSAR* Aquatic toxicity to fish, invertebrates, algae CAS RN or Chemical Structure in SMILES notation Download at no cost from ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇▇/oppt/newchems /21ecosar.htm E-FAST Surface water ingestion, fish ingestion, ground water ingestion, ambient air inhalation, indoor air inhalation, dermal exposure, aquatic environment exposure/risk Physical / chemical properties, fate properties, release amounts, release medium, release location, aquatic concentration of concern, NPDES number Download at no cost from ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇▇/opptintr/expos ure ReachScan Impact of surface water discharges on drinking water facilities, i.e., chemical concentration downstream at drinking water intake point Facility location (NPDES number), release data Contact ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ at ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇.▇▇▇ for a free copy Occupational Exposure Spreadsheets^ Vapor generation rates and worker exposure to vapors during filling, sampling, and to open liquid pools; and during degreasing operations; Water releases and worker exposures to powders during textile dyeing Molecular weight, vapor pressure, operation hrs/day, worker exposure hrs/day; if applicable, volume of degreasing solvent or dye used, dye exhaustion rate Contact ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ at ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇.▇▇▇ for a free copy ^ “ChemSTEER,” ”, a comprehensive Windows®-based tool containing methods from these spreadsheets and many other methods for estimating workplace exposures and environmental releases from industrial and commercial operations, is currently under development. July 2000 DISCLAIMERS: Mention of trade names or commercial products, or services does not convey, and should not be interpreted as conveying official USEPA approval, endorsement, or recommendation. The models presented in OPPT’s P2 Framework have been developed over a period of more than 20 years by OPPT, EPA contractors and/or grantees or others in the scientific and technical community, to screen chemicals in the absence of data. Through the P2 Framework, OPPT is presenting these screening models to industry and other stakeholders in the hopes that use of these models early in the research and development process will result in safer chemicals entering commerce. The P2 Framework models should be used for priority setting and to provide additional information so that choices can be made on the chemicals being evaluated. Other chemical screening methodologies have been developed and are in use by chemical companies and other stakeholders. The Agency recognizes that other models are available and that these models can also be of value in chemical screening efforts. CAUTION: Screening models predict data with an inherent degree of uncertainty, and should never be used to replace measured data from well designed studies. Measured data are always preferred over predicted data. If measured data are not available, measured data on close analogs can be used. If no analog data are available, screening level models, such as those in the P2 Framework, may be used for priority setting and to predict values that can be used to indicate which chemicals may need further testing or evaluation.
Appears in 1 contract