Significant Results Clause Samples

The 'Significant results' clause defines the criteria or benchmarks that must be met for a project, service, or research activity to be considered successful or to trigger certain contractual obligations. In practice, this clause may specify measurable outcomes, such as achieving a particular performance metric, reaching a milestone, or obtaining a specific result in testing or analysis. Its core function is to provide clear standards for evaluating success, thereby reducing ambiguity and potential disputes between parties regarding whether contractual goals have been met.
Significant Results. By the end of this reporting period, the main results are related to the requirements from all involved stakeholders as well as a more detailed overview of the pilot participants expectations and results. These are described in D3.1. However, two other preliminary results have also been produced. One of utmost importance is the established lessons plans including a framework, taxonomy and scenarios (D3.3) developed under the lead of COVUNI. These lessons plans are important for the first development of the different componentsthat will be prototypical tested in the small scale pilots. A second pre-liminary resultsis the inventory of useful components and expertise withinthe consortium as well as from many of the pilot sites. This overviewwill ensure high re-use of existing components and thus reduce the time to market.
Significant Results. Not applicable as not active
Significant Results. The dissemination and communication plan has been completed, all partners are actively promoting the project with a growing presence on twitter. The website is complete with a public and private section and it is also available in nine languages.
Significant Results. In furtherance of University's role as a public institution of higher education it is necessary that significant results of research and testing activities be reasonably available for publication by the University, and Sponsor acknowledges that University may publish the results of research and testing conducted in connection with this Agreement.
Significant Results. The two significant results when comparing means are by treatment group and treated vs. fellow eyes, both at 1 year. The first of these results suggests that the contact lens treatment decreases astigmatism (Table 3), whereas the IOL treatment does not. A similar result can be seen in the comparison between treated and fellow eyes at 1 year: the fellow eyes decreased in astigmatism between baseline and 1 year, while the treated eyes had only a very slight decrease. In both cases, however, our results are less than clinically significant. The difference of 0.47 diopters between the two treatment groups at 1 year of age is statistically significant; however, less than one half of one diopter of astigmatism is only moderately significant in the clinical setting. The same can be said for treated and fellow eyes. Here the difference between the two groups at 1 year is even less than the other significant result. No other demographic factors or elements of the surgical technique significantly increase astigmatism at 1 year of age, or the change in keratometric astigmatism from baseline measurements, in IATS patients. One possible cause for decreased astigmatism in one treatment group may be due to the fact that wearing a contact lens can reshape the cornea. A practice, called orthokeratology, is sometimes used to correct other refractive errors like myopia. However, orthokeratology, according to contact lens manufacturers, can also correct small amounts of astigmatism: amounts between 0.75 and 1.50 diopters are considered correctable. However, in a new case report (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇, 2010), it is reported that new orthokeratology designs in contact lenses may correct more severe levels of astigmatism, as high as 7.0 D. It is therefore possible that some contact lens wearers, especially those with smaller baseline astigmatism values in the contact lens arm of treatment, may unknowingly be receiving orthokeratology treatment by attempting to correct for myopia. This may explain small changes in the mean values at 1 year and, especially, the change values between baseline and 1 year of age.

Related to Significant Results

  • Audit Results If an audit by a Party determines that an overpayment or an underpayment has occurred, a notice of such overpayment or underpayment shall be given to the other Party together with those records from the audit which support such determination.

  • Test Results The employer, upon request from an employee or former employee, will provide the confidential written report issued pursuant to 4.9 of the Canadian Model in respect to that employee or former employee.

  • SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES The Company prepared the interim financial statements with the same accounting policies used in the preparation of the annual financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016.

  • Narrative Results i. For the first Quarterly Claims Review Report only, a description of (a) Khanna’s billing and coding system(s), including the identification, by position description, of the personnel involved in coding and billing, and (b) a description of controls in place to ensure that all items and services billed to Medicare or TRICARE program by Khanna are medically necessary and appropriately documented. Subsequent Quarterly Claims Review Reports should describe any significant changes to items (a) and (b) or, if no significant changes were made, state that the systems and controls remain the same as described in the prior Quarterly Claims Review Report. ii. A narrative explanation of the results of the Quarterly Claims Sample, including reasons for errors, patterns noted, etc.

  • BID TABULATION AND RESULTS Bid tabulations shall be available thirty (30) days after opening on the Orange County website at: ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/orangebids/bidresults/results.asp or upon notice of intended action, whichever is sooner.