Site File Review Clause Samples

Site File Review. The ACRC will check the practice area against the Mississippi State Site Files to determine if previously recorded cultural resources are within or near the practice area. The ACRC will then forward the documentation to the CRS for evaluation. A. No archaeological sites are listed in the Mississippi Archaeological Site File Grid within the same grid section as the proposed practice, and no NHL, NRHP or Mississippi Landmark properties are located within or near the APE. B. No cultural resources are found during the field inspection,
View SourceView Similar (2)
Site File Review. The ACRC will check the practice area against the Mississippi State Site Files to determine if previously recorded cultural resources are within or near the practice area. The ACRC will then forward the documentation to the CRS for evaluation. A. No archaeological sites are listed in the Mississippi Archaeological Site File Section Grid within the same Section, Township, and Range as the proposed practice, and no NHL, NRHP or Mississippi Landmark properties are located within or near the APE. and; B. No cultural resources are found during the field inspection, C. One or more of the following: 1) There is Good to Moderate (100-30%) bare ground surface visibility, or; 2) The practice is located on a Slope greater than 10% vertical gradient,or; 3) Soils in the practice area consist of heavy clay or are poorly-drained gley soils, or; 4) Area is severely eroded or deflated, or orange clay subsoil is evident at the surface, or; 5) The disturbance that will be caused by the practice will not exceed the depth of previous disturbances (e.g., existing normal plowzone – not subsoiler/chisel plow depth), or; 6) The area of potential disturbance is of minimal size (less than 1 acre or a narrow, linear area of disturbance like a pipeline trench).
View Source

Related to Site File Review

  • OIG INSPECTION, AUDIT, AND REVIEW RIGHTS ‌ In addition to any other rights OIG may have by statute, regulation, or contract, OIG or its duly authorized representative(s) may conduct interviews, examine or request copies of ▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ books, records, and other documents and supporting materials and/or conduct on-site reviews of any of ▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ locations for the purpose of verifying and evaluating: (a) ▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ compliance with the terms of this IA and (b) ▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ compliance with the requirements of the Federal health care programs. The documentation described above shall be made available by ▇▇▇▇▇▇ to OIG or its duly authorized representative(s) at all reasonable times for inspection, audit, and/or reproduction. Furthermore, for purposes of this provision, OIG or its duly authorized representative(s) may interview ▇▇▇▇▇▇ and any of ▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ employees or contractors who consent to be interviewed at the individual’s place of business during normal business hours or at such other place and time as may be mutually agreed upon between the individual and OIG. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ shall assist OIG or its duly authorized representative(s) in contacting and arranging interviews with such individuals upon OIG’s request. ▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ employees and contractors may elect to be interviewed with or without a representative of ▇▇▇▇▇▇ present.

  • Inspection Reports A "full inspection report" comprises a Site Master File (compiled by the manufacturer or by the inspectorate) and a narrative report by the inspectorate. A "detailed report" responds to specific queries about a firm by the other Party.

  • Inspection Checklist (Check one)

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.