Standards for comprehensive per- formance revie Clause Samples

Standards for comprehensive per- formance revie. A participating juris- diction’s performance will be com- prehensively reviewed periodically, as prescribed by HUD, to determine: (1) For local participating jurisdic- tions and State participating jurisdic- tions administering their own HOME programs, whether the participating jurisdiction has committed the HOME funds in the United States Treasury ac- count as required by § 92.500 and ex- pended the funds in the United States Treasury account as required by § 92.500, and has met the requirements of this part, particularly eligible ac- tivities, income targeting, afford- ability, and matching requirements; or (2) For State participating jurisdic- tions distributing HOME funds to State recipients, whether the State has met the matching contribution and other requirements of this part; has distrib- uted the funds in accordance with the requirements of this part; and has made such reviews and audits of its State recipients as may be appropriate to determine whether they have satis- fied the requirements of paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
View SourceView Similar (2)

Related to Standards for comprehensive per- formance revie

  • Quality Assurance Program An employee shall be entitled to leave of absence without loss of earnings from her or his regularly scheduled working hours for the purpose of writing examinations required by the College of Nurses of Ontario arising out of the Quality Assurance Program.

  • COUNTY’S QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN The County or its agent will evaluate the Contractor’s performance under this Contract on not less than an annual basis. Such evaluation will include assessing the Contractor’s compliance with all Contract terms and conditions and performance standards. Contractor deficiencies which the County determines are severe or continuing and that may place performance of the Contract in jeopardy if not corrected will be reported to the Board of Supervisors. The report will include improvement/corrective action measures taken by the County and the Contractor. If improvement does not occur consistent with the corrective action measures, the County may terminate this Contract or impose other penalties as specified in this Contract.

  • Data Quality 4.1 Each party ensures that the shared Personal Data is accurate. 4.2 Parties will notify each other with undue delay if they become aware of inaccuracies in shared Personal Data.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • Research Use Reporting To assure adherence to NIH GDS Policy, the PI agrees to provide annual Progress Updates as part of the annual Project Renewal or Project Close-out processes, prior to the expiration of the one (1) year data access period. The PI who is seeking Renewal or Close-out of a project agree to complete the appropriate online forms and provide specific information such as how the data have been used, including publications or presentations that resulted from the use of the requested dataset(s), a summary of any plans for future research use (if the PI is seeking renewal), any violations of the terms of access described within this Agreement and the implemented remediation, and information on any downstream intellectual property generated from the data. The PI also may include general comments regarding suggestions for improving the data access process in general. Information provided in the progress updates helps NIH evaluate program activities and may be considered by the NIH GDS governance committees as part of NIH’s effort to provide ongoing stewardship of data sharing activities subject to the NIH GDS Policy.