Statistically significant differences. Large sample sizes may inflate measures of statistical significance and may lead to false conclusions about the strength of association. The chi-square measure of association, in particular, is susceptible to this possibility. Therefore, we increased the standards for designating whether a relationship can be termed ―statistically significant.‖ The benchmarks shown in Table 5 must be met for us to term an association statistically significant; the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ ▇▇▇- square must have probability of a type 1 error of less than .001 and either the Phi coefficient or ▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ V must have a value of .150 or greater. Throughout this document, any differences reported meet these criteria, unless otherwise stated. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ ▇▇▇-square <.001 Phi coefficient or ▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ V .150 or higher Unlike previous years, non-responses have not been included in the analysis. Therefore, throughout this report, unless explicitly stated as a subpopulation, overall results do not include those who did not respond to a particular question. However, for questions where ―don’t know‖ is a valid response, overall results include those who selected ―don’t know‖ to a particular question, although they are not always shown in a table. Therefore, responses to some questions may not sum to 100%.
Appears in 2 contracts
Sources: Agreement for Data Use, Agreement for Data Use