Study Process Sample Clauses
The Study Process clause outlines the procedures and steps that must be followed when conducting a study or research project under the agreement. It typically details the responsibilities of each party, timelines for various phases, and requirements for documentation or reporting. For example, it may specify how data should be collected, reviewed, and approved, or set milestones for interim and final deliverables. The core function of this clause is to ensure that all parties have a clear, agreed-upon framework for how the study will be managed, reducing misunderstandings and promoting efficient collaboration.
Study Process. The Replacement Request will consist of an environmental study as set forth in Section 15.6.1 and may consist of three additional studies: (1) System impact study for the Replacement Request (Replacement Impact Study) as set forth in Section 15.6.2, (2) Reliability Assessment Study for the Replacement Request (Reliability Assessment) as set forth in Section 15.6.3, and (3) Facilities Study for the Replacement Request (Replacement Facilities Study) as set forth in Section 15.6.4.
Study Process. Capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings specified in the Glossary of Terms in Attachment 1 or the body of these procedures.
Study Process. Repower Requests will consist of an environmental study as set forth in Section 14.5.1 and may consist of two additional studies: (1) A system impact study for the Repower Request (Repower Impact Study) as set forth in Section 14.5.2, and (2) a Facilities Study for the Repower Request (Repower Facilities Study) as set forth in Section 14.5.3.
Study Process. Deposit Change in Ownership Legal Name of the Interconnection Member (or, if an individual, individual’s name) Alternative Contact Information (if different from the Interconnection Member)
Study Process. The procedure for evaluating an Interconnection Request that includes the Section 4 scoping meeting, system impact study, and facilities study. The Study process may be a serial Study process or a Cluster Study process, as applicable.
Study Process. The procedure for evaluating an Interconnection Request that includes the section 3 scoping meeting, feasibility study, system impact study, and facilities study. Transmission Owner – The entity that owns, leases or otherwise possesses an interest in the portion of the Transmission System at the Point of Interconnection and may be a Party to the Small Generator Interconnection Agreement to the extent necessary. Transmission Provider – The public utility (or its designated agent) that owns, controls, or operates transmission or distribution facilities used for the transmission of electricity in interstate commerce and provides transmission service under the Tariff. The term Transmission Provider should be read to include the Transmission Owner when the Transmission Owner is separate from the Transmission Provider. Transmission System – The facilities owned, controlled or operated by the Transmission Provider or the Transmission Owner that are used to provide transmission service under the Tariff. Upgrades – The required additions and modifications to the Transmission Provider’s Transmission System at or beyond the Point of Interconnection. Upgrades may be Network Upgrades or Distribution Upgrades. Upgrades do not include Interconnection Facilities. Transmission Provider:
Study Process. 4.1 Applicability The Study Process shall be used by an Interconnection Customer proposing to interconnect its Generating Facility with the Utility's System if the Generating Facility exceeds the size limits for the Section 3 Fast Track Process, is not certified, or is certified but did not pass the Fast Track Process or the 20 kW Inverter Process. The Interconnection Customer may be required to submit additional documentation, as may be requested by the Utility in writing, during the Study Process. Any changes to the study process desired by a Utility shall first be approved by the Commission before its implementation. In the interim period, the Utility shall continue to effectuate the studies without delay. delay “good utility practice” guidelines consistent with previous practice without . follows Duke Energy (WG1) proposed rewriting section 4.1 as . Commented [A70]: December Comment from GGE US: We believe fact based decision making (technical and economic) to introduction of new technical parameters and/or good utility practices should both be discussed and aligned with broad stakeholder input. EX. DSDR LVR policy as it relates to degradation and economic benefits to ratepayers. Commented [A71]: Comment: Requires an IC to provide information or to establish binding response times during the study process. Reasonable timeframes for ICs to produce information requested by the utility along with an opportunity to request an extension/cure. Tolling the study timelines. There is not currently a clear procedure for the utility to require an IC to provide information or to establish binding response times during the study process, which have been increasingly necessary as new study standards have resulted in customer decision points within SIS as well as additional requests for project details and data to complete more Furthermore, any changes in the Utility’s application of “good utility practice” and/or technical parameters shall also first be approved by the Commission before its implementation. In the interim period, the Utility shall continue to use the existing
Study Process. 4.1 Applicability The Study Process shall be used by an Interconnection Customer proposing to interconnect its Generating Facility with the Utility's System if the Generating Facility exceeds the size limits for the Section 3 Fast Track Process, is not certified, or is certified but did not pass the Fast Track Process or the 20 kW Inverter Process. The Interconnection Customer may be required to submit additional information or documentation, as may be requested by the Utility in writing, during the Study Process. SC Generator Interconnection Procedures 24
4.1.1 Applicability of Alternative Cluster Study Process ForThe Commission approved Cluster Study Process for Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC and Duke Energy Progress, LLC, the Commission has authorized an alternative Cluster Study process, is attached hereto at Appendix ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇, which shall supersede and control over any conflicting provisions of these Procedures. Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC and Duke Energy Progress, LLC shall maintain the applicable Appendix ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ on their websites. Interconnection Customers may obtain additional information from the Utility regarding applicability of the Cluster Study process through the process established in Section 1.1.4. The Commission approved Cluster Study Process for Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc., is attached hereto at Appendix DESC CS, which shall supersede and control over any conflicting provisions to these procedures. Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc. shall maintain the applicable Appendix DESC CS on their website. Interconnection Customers may obtain additional information from the Utility regarding applicability of the Cluster Study process through the process established in Section 1.1.4.
Study Process. 4.1 Applicability
Study Process. 7. The internal quality control system of the higher education institution includes quality assurance aspects related to the provision of quality study process, including study programmes for foreigners.
8. Proportion of higher education institution lecturers working in study programmes with B2 and C1 levels of English (separately).
9. The higher education institution provides English language training for local lecturers.
10. The higher education institution educates academic, administrative and technical staff about cultural differences and intercultural communication.