Summary of Findings Sample Clauses
The "Summary of Findings" clause serves to provide a concise overview of the key results, conclusions, or discoveries made during an investigation, audit, or analysis. Typically, this section distills complex data or detailed reports into clear, accessible points, highlighting the most significant outcomes for stakeholders. By presenting the main findings in a summarized format, the clause ensures that readers can quickly grasp the essential information without reviewing the entire document, thereby enhancing clarity and facilitating informed decision-making.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Summary of Findings a. This section should include The Authority’s findings for any archaeological properties evaluated and determined not eligible for the NRHP for which SHPO concurrence is being requested within 30 days of receipt of the ASR.
b. For reference, this section should include a summary of those archaeological properties reported to SHPO in the HPSR.
Summary of Findings. This section should include findings for historic properties identified in the APE, and for any non- eligible properties for which SHPO concurrence on ineligibility is needed early in the environmental process.
Summary of Findings a. This section should include The Authority’s findings for any non-eligible properties for which SHPO concurrence is requested within 30 days of receipt of the HASR, but which were not submitted in the HPSR. For reference, this section should include a summary of those historic architectural properties reported to SHPO in the HPSR.
Summary of Findings e Describe the nature and extent of findings arisen from both systems and substantive testing. (Categorise these findings by reference to their level of importance – «major», «intermedi- ate» and «minor». The list of these findings is shown in the annex to this report). Indicate those errors, which are conside- red systemic in nature and assess the probability of a possible subsequent qualification linked to the errors. Describe and quantify any irregularities encountered.
Summary of Findings e Describe the nature and extent of findings arisen from both sy- stems and substantive testing. (Categorise these findings by refe- rence to their level of importance – «major», «intermediate» and «minor». The list of these findings is shown in the annex to this report). Indicate those errors, which are considered systemic in nature and assess the probability of a possible subsequent quali- fication linked to the errors. Describe and quantify any irregula- rities encountered.
Summary of Findings. The subject property is not currently contiguous to the city limits, but is within the mile-and- a-half extraterritorial jurisdictional area of the City of Urbana.
Summary of Findings. The proposed R-3, Single and Two-Family Residential Zoning District would be consistent with the current land use of the subject parcel and surrounding properties.
Summary of Findings. On September 8, 2005 the Urbana Plan Commission made the following findings in relation to the proposed annexation agreement and rezoning.
Summary of Findings. The identified systematic reviews did not draw firm conclusions in favour of any particular intervention aimed at improving adherence to medication. The published literature on medication adherence interventions is relatively small and heterogeneous. The authors of the reviews reflected on the poor methodological quality of the studies and the inadequacies in terms of reporting of results and missing information, leading to a high risk of bias. Very few studies report explicitly on the effectiveness of DAAs among the other frequent pharmacy interventions aimed at improving adherence, making it difficult to draw clear conclusions.
Summary of Findings. Key findings with respect to each of the preceding tasks will be presented to summarize the existing financial conditions of JWA, key comparative metrics identified in benchmarking process, and results of the financial plan developed for each GA facility/development.