Support Evaluation Sample Clauses

Support Evaluation. The parties will attempt in good faith to promptly resolve any controversy or claim relating to performance of the technical support assistance provided by Palm under this Agreement. Each party may request the other party to involve appropriate senior executives of such other party who shall have the authority to resolve the matter. 1. (“Licensor”) grants the end user (“End User”) a nonexclusive license to use the software accompanying the Licensor Product (“Software”). With respect to the Licensor Product Desktop Software, End User may reproduce and provide one (1) copy of such Software for each personal computer or Licensor Product on which such Software is used as permitted hereunder. With respect to the Licensor Product Platform Software, End User may use such Software only on one (1) Licensor Product. End User may assign its right under the End User License Agreement to an assignee of all of End User’s rights and interest to the Software only if End User transfers all copies of the Software subject to the End User License Agreement to such assignee and such assignee agrees in writing to be bound by all the terms and conditions of the End User License Agreement. 2. End User agrees not to reverse engineer, decompile or disassemble the Software. End User will not copy the Software except as necessary to use it in accordance with this End User License Agreement. End User agrees that any such copies of the Software shall contain the same proprietary notices which appear on and in the original copy of the Software. 3. Except as stated above, the End User License Agreement does not grant End User any rights (whether by license, ownership or otherwise) in or to intellectual property with respect to the Software.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Support Evaluation. From time to time following acceptance by 3Com of the Products, but no less frequently than once each calendar quarter, management-level support representatives from each party will meet to review the performance of, and recommend improvements regarding, the technical support and warranty assistance offered to End Users and Authorized Resellers under this Agreement.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Support Evaluation. The parties will attempt in good faith to promptly resolve any controversy or claim relating to performance of the technical support assistance provided by Palm under this Agreement. Each party may request the other party to involve appropriate senior executives of such other party who shall have the authority to resolve the matter.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Support Evaluation. From time to time following acceptance by 3Com of the Products, but no less frequently than [***] from each party will meet to [***] regarding, the [***] provided to 3Com under this Agreement. 30. [***] = Certain information on this page has been omitted and filed separately with the Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions.
View Source
Support Evaluation. The parties will attempt in good faith to promptly resolve any controversy or claim relating to performance of the technical support assistance provided by PalmSource under this Agreement. Each party may request the other party to initiate an escalation process by notifying one of the other party’s Designated Support Personnel (in the case of PalmSource) or Authorized Callers (in the case of Licensee). 1. ___________ (“Licensor”) grants the end user (“End User”) a nonexclusive license to use the software accompanying the Licensor Product (“Software”). With respect to the Licensor Product Desktop Software, End User may reproduce and provide one (1) copy of such Software for each personal computer or Licensor Product on which such Software is used as permitted hereunder. With respect to the Licensor Product Platform Software, End User may use such Software only on one (1) Licensor Product. End User may assign its right under the End User License Agreement to an assignee of all of End User’s rights and interest to the Software only if End User transfers all copies of the Software subject to the End User License Agreement to such assignee and such assignee agrees in writing to be bound by all the terms and conditions of the End User License Agreement.
View Source
Support Evaluation. The parties will attempt in good faith to promptly resolve any controversy or claim relating to performance of the technical support assistance provided by 3Com under this Agreement. Each party may request the other party to involve appropriate senior executives of such other party who shall have the authority to resolve the matter.
View Source
Support Evaluation. The parties will attempt in good faith to promptly resolve any controversy or claim relating to performance of the technical support assistance provided by PalmSource under this Agreement. Each party may request the other party to initiate an escalation process by notifying one of the other party’s Designated Support Personnel (in the case of PalmSource) or Authorized Callers (in the case of Licensee).
View Source

Related to Support Evaluation

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and ▇▇▇▇ them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Williamson County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following: A. Problems, delays, adverse conditions which may materially affect the ability to meet the objectives of an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, or preclude the attainment of Project Engineering Services units by established time periods; and such disclosure shall be accompanied by statement of actions taken or contemplated, and County assistance needed to resolve the situation, if any; and B. Favorable developments or events which enable meeting goals sooner than anticipated in relation to an applicable Work Authorization’s or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto.