Survey Protocol Sample Clauses

The Survey Protocol clause establishes the procedures and requirements for conducting surveys related to a property or project. It typically outlines who is responsible for commissioning the survey, the standards or specifications the survey must meet, and the timeline for completion. For example, it may require a licensed surveyor to prepare a boundary or topographical survey before a transaction closes. The core function of this clause is to ensure that all parties have accurate, reliable information about the property, thereby reducing the risk of disputes over boundaries, encroachments, or other physical characteristics.
Survey Protocol. For the purposes of 7.1, the Parties will develop and agree on a protocol for the priority and timing of Adequate Surveys for the Lands, including proposed Closing Dates, having regard for: (a) HRFN’s priorities; (b) efficiency and economy, including the availability of British Columbia land surveyors; (c) the necessity to clarify the boundaries due to imminent public or private development on adjacent lands; and (d) the requirements under provincial law, including legislated timelines.
Survey Protocol. For the purposes of 7.1, the Parties will develop and agree on a protocol for the priority and timing of Adequate Surveys for the Lands, including proposed Closing Dates, having regard for: (a) PRFN’s priorities, including, as appropriate, the processes, procedures and policies of the Federal Crown relating to additions to reserve; (b) efficiency and economy, including the availability of British Columbia land surveyors and minimizing the number of different Closing Dates; (c) the necessity to clarify the boundaries due to imminent public or private development on adjacent lands; and (d) the requirements under provincial law, including legislated timelines.
Survey Protocol. All “suitable” habitats within an action area (area to be affected by a project) should be surveyed. Surveys in suitable lentic and lotic systems should be conducted as follows: For use by central data repository only: NEW SITE: Y N NUM: _ _ _--- _ _ _ _
Survey Protocol. For the purposes of 7.1, the Parties will, following the finalization of the Lands under Article 6, develop and agree on a protocol for the priority and timing of Adequate Surveys for the Lands, including proposed Closing Dates, having regard for: (a) DRFN’s priorities; (b) efficiency and economy, including the availability of British Columbia land surveyors and minimizing the number of different Closing Dates; (c) the necessity to clarify the boundaries due to imminent public or private development on adjacent lands; (d) the requirements under provincial law, including legislated timelines; and (e) any changes to the protocol to which the Parties may agree from time to time.
Survey Protocol. The current Service endorsed protocol for northern spotted owls. As of this writing, this refers to the USFWS Protocol for Surveying Proposed Management Activities That May Impact Northern Spotted Owls February 2, 2011, revised January 9, 2012.
Survey Protocol. ODOT agrees to conduct a full ecological investigation, and to prepare an ESR (or equivalent appropriate documentation) in accordance with the ODOT Ecological Manual, to document that these conditions have been met. This documentation will be included in the ODOT project file and discussed in the NEPA document prepared for the project.
Survey Protocol. All “suitable” habitats within an action area (area to be affected by a project) should be surveyed. Surveys in suitable lentic and lotic systems should be conducted as follows: DATE: MM DD YYYY DRY TANK: Y START TIME: STOP TIME: SEARCH TIME:MIN OBSERVERS: *SITE NAME: SITE AT: NUM *UTM ZONE: 11 12 13 EASTING NORTHING ELEVATION m

Related to Survey Protocol

  • Protocol The attached Protocol shall be an integral part of this Agreement.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Signaling protocol 4.1.3.1 SS7 Signaling is AT&T-21STATE’s preferred method for signaling. Where MF signaling is currently used, the Parties agree to use their best efforts to convert to SS7. If SS7 services are provided by AT&T-21STATE, they will be provided in accordance with the provisions of the applicable access tariffs. 4.1.3.2 Where MF signaling is currently used, the Parties agree to interconnect their networks using MF or dual tone MF (DTMF) signaling, subject to availability at the End Office Switch or Tandem Switch at which Interconnection occurs. The Parties acknowledge that the use of MF signaling may not be optimal. AT&T-21STATE will not be responsible for correcting any undesirable characteristics, service problems or performance problems that are associated with MF/SS7 inter-working or the signaling protocol required for Interconnection with CLEC employing MF signaling.

  • Security Protocols Both parties agree to maintain security protocols that meet industry standards in the transfer or transmission of any data, including ensuring that data may only be viewed or accessed by parties legally allowed to do so. Provider shall maintain all data obtained or generated pursuant to the Service Agreement in a secure digital environment and not copy, reproduce, or transmit data obtained pursuant to the Service Agreement, except as necessary to fulfill the purpose of data requests by LEA.

  • Study Population ‌ Infants who underwent creation of an enterostomy receiving postoperative care and awaiting enterostomy closure: to be assessed for eligibility: n = 201 to be assigned to the study: n = 106 to be analysed: n = 106 Duration of intervention per patient of the intervention group: 6 weeks between enterostomy creation and enterostomy closure Follow-up per patient: 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post enterostomy closure, following enterostomy closure (12-month follow-up only applicable for patients that are recruited early enough to complete this follow-up within the 48 month of overall study duration).