Table B1 Sample Clauses

Table B1. During the mobility Component code (if any) Component title at the Sending Institution (as indicated in the course catalogue) Semester [e.g. autumn/spring; term] Number of ECTS credits (or equivalent) to be recognised by the Sending Institution Responsible person13 at the Sending Institution Academic coordinator Responsible person at the Receiving Institution14 Academic coordinator Table C After the mobility Component code (if any) Component title at the Receiving Institution (as indicated in the course catalogue) Was the component successfully completed by the student? [Yes/No] Number of ECTS credits (or equivalent) Grades received at the Receiving Institution Table D After the mobility Component code (if any) Title of recognised component at the Sending Institution (as indicated in the course catalogue) Number of ECTS credits (or equivalent) recognised Grades registered at the Sending Institution (if applicable)

Table B1. Pre-Deposit Participation

Table B1. Penstemon Conservation Area and Interim Conservation Area Locations by Conservation Unit

Table B1. Patent Examiners Rates of Pay Current Structure Current Structure New Structure at Commencement Date Commencement Date 14 May 2009 Oct 2009 4% 4% 1% B7. Transitional Arrangements

Table B1. Penstemon Conservation Area and Interim Conservation Area Locations by Conservation Unit Unit Number UTM* Easting UTM Northing Unit 3 Unit 4 Table B1. Penstemon Conservation Area and Interim Conservation Area Locations by Conservation Unit Unit Number UTM* Easting UTM Northing Unit 5

Table B1. Group of educational components in the student's degree that would normally be completed at the sending institution and which will be replaced by the study abroad

Table B1. Proposed Evaluation Budget TOTAL EVALUATION COST

Table B1. Variance estimates and autocorrelation estimate for the non-parametric LLM used in the analysis presented in Table 2 51 baited hook was released and timed to the bottom of the tank. 53 The baited hook under load of the sinking swivel set with and without a TDR attached averaged 0.9170.02 m s—1 and 55 0.9170.02 m s—1, respectively. There was no detectable effect of the TDR on the sink rate of the baited hook. 57 59 CONCLUSION 61 The trials in the tank indicate that the addition of a ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ TDR to the branch lines used on the Ocean Explorer was Variance s.e. Z-ratio 53 Set 8.995 × 10—3 6.465 × 10—3 1.391 P-unit.TIMEg (1,2] 6.227 × 10—3 1.176 × 10—3 5.297 P-unit.TIMEg (2,3] 5.657 × 10—3 1.199 × 10—3 4.717 P-unit.TIMEg (3,4] 4.158 × 10—3 0.984 × 10—3 4.224 P-unit.TIMEg (4,5] 2.336 × 10—3 0.681 × 10—3 3.433 P-unit.TIMEg (5,10] 1.471 × 10—3 0.480 × 10—3 3.061 P-unit.TIMEg (10,20] 0.0 — Boundary EU residual variance 62.638 × 10—3 9.068 × 10—3 value 6.908 Autocorrelation 0.975 0.004 252.5 SINK RATES OF PELAGIC LONGLINES AND IMPLICATIONS FOR SEABIRD INTERACTIONS 9 1 which set of predicted mean depths have been used. The bounds for each level of the factor used in the comparison are shown.

Table B1. Summary of Costs Year 1 Not to Exceed Cost Year 2 Not to Exceed Cost MAXIMUM COMPENSATION – INITIAL 2-YEAR TERM $8,784,576 Table B2: Management Fees Cost Element Year 1 Not to Exceed Cost Year 2 Not to Exceed Cost MAXIMUM COMPENSATION – INITIAL 2-YEAR TERM $2,060,000 Job Classification Hourly Rate Salary Hours Per Year Pay Periods Year 1 Cost Year 2 Cost Subtotal (a) $1,549,001 $1,549,001* Job Classification Hourly Rate Salary Hours Per Year Pay Periods Year 1 Cost Year 2 Cost Subtotal (b) $654,387 $654,387* Subtotal (a + b) $2,203,388 $2,203,388* MAXIMUM COST – INITIAL 2-YEAR TERM $4,406,776 Job Classification Rate Basis Rate 12/1/19 – 6/31/20 Rate 7/1/20 – 6/31/21 Rate 7/1/21 – 11/30/21 Cost Element Year 1 Cost Year 2 Cost MAXIMUM COST – INITIAL 2-YEAR TERM $2,117,800