Taking Corrective Action Clause Samples

Taking Corrective Action. The Agency is normally responsible for investigating possible misconduct and initiating disciplinary action. Except where a formal record sufficient to take discipline already exists, such as a report of investigation conducted by the Office of Inspector General or a court record, the Agency should follow these procedures: - Interview the employee who has allegedly committed an offense. - Interview witnesses and any others who can provide pertinent information. - Try to reconcile any conflicting statements or other evidence. Re-interview the parties concerned, if appropriate. 1. Where the Agency requests in writing using a document other than GSA Form 225, the Agency will inform the employee in writing that “this is part of an inquiry into the facts that may lead to corrective action.” 2. Before issuing a warning notice or reprimand, the Agency must discuss the incidents giving rise to the discipline with the employee or permit the employee to review and comment on a GSA Form 225, Record of Infraction, or other written report or description of the incidents. A 225 or other written report must be prepared when the Agency is recommending action to a higher level. Employees will normally be given no more than five (5) working days to review and comment on the report. A reasonable amount of official time will be allowed to prepare a response to the report. Employees will have the opportunity to consult a union representative when drafting a response to a 225 form, or the written report. 3. A copy of all statements, letters and/or investigative reports, if any, upon which the Form 225 or other written report is based will be included with the written report for the employee's review. 4. The Agency will not select the specific disciplinary action to impose or recommend until after discussing the incidents with the employee or reviewing the employee's response to the written report as appropriate. 5. Upon request, the Agency will discuss the basis for the final decision with the employee and/or the employee’s Union representative. If a warning notice or reprimand is issued, the employee will be informed of the right to grieve the action under Article 7. 6. The employee will be given a copy of any other written document(s) not previously provided which was/were relied upon in issuing the warning notice or reprimand. 7. If the Agency determines that no disciplinary or corrective action is required after following the steps in this Section, the employee will be so i...
View Source

Related to Taking Corrective Action

  • Corrective Action Despite its right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Article, the LHIN may choose not to terminate this Agreement and may take whatever corrective action it considers necessary and appropriate, including suspending Funding for such period as the LHIN determines, to ensure the successful completion of the Services in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.

  • Corrective Actions The Government will use its best efforts to ensure that each Covered Provider (i) takes, where necessary, appropriate and timely corrective actions in response to audits, (ii) considers whether the results of the Covered Provider’s audit necessitates adjustment of the Government’s records, and (iii) permits independent auditors to have access to its records and financial statements as necessary.

  • Mitigation and Corrective Action Business Associate shall mitigate, to the extent practicable, any harmful effect that is known to it of an impermissible use or disclosure of PHI, even if the impermissible use or disclosure does not constitute a Breach. Business Associate shall draft and carry out a plan of corrective action to address any incident of impermissible use or disclosure of PHI. If requested by Covered Entity, Business Associate shall make its mitigation and corrective action plans available to Covered Entity. Business Associate shall require a Subcontractor to agree to these same terms and conditions.

  • Corrective Action Plans If the OAG finds deficiencies in ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s performance under this Grant Contract, the OAG, at its sole discretion, may impose one or more of the following remedies as part of a corrective action plan: increase of monitoring visits; require additional or more detailed financial and/or programmatic reports be submitted; require prior approval for expenditures; require additional technical or management assistance and/or make modifications in business practices; reduce the contract amount; and/or terminate this Grant Contract. The foregoing are not exclusive remedies, and the OAG may impose other requirements that the OAG determines will be in the best interest of the State.

  • Corrective Action Plan Within fifteen (15) Business Days following the establishment of the Joint Remediation Committee, the Purchasers, in consultation with the Sellers, shall prepare and submit to the Joint Remediation Committee an initial draft of the Corrective Action Plan. The parties shall work in good faith through the Joint Remediation Committee to finalize the Corrective Action Plan within fifteen (15) Business Days of the Purchasers’ submission of the initial draft of the Correct Action Plan. At the end of such period, if the Sellers reasonably determine that the Corrective Action Plan proposed by the Purchasers (as may be modified over the course of such period) would not reasonably be expected to satisfactorily address the Major Default, then the Sellers may escalate the issue to the Head of Commercial Capital (or equivalent leader of any successor business unit) of the Seller Group and the Chief Executive Officer of the Bank Assets Purchaser (the “Senior Executives”) and the Senior Executives shall work collaboratively (including with the Joint Remediation Committee) to develop a mutually agreeable Corrective Action Plan within fifteen (15) Business Days.