Technical audits and reviews Sample Clauses

Technical audits and reviews. ‌ 1. The Commission may initiate a technical audit or review at any time during the implementation of the project and up to up to five years after the end of the project. The aim of a technical audit or review shall be to assess the work carried out under the project over a certain period, inter alia by evaluating the project reports and deliverables relevant to the period in question. Such audits and reviews may cover scientific, technological and other aspects relating to the proper execution of the project and the grant agreement. 2. With respect to the Description of Work (Annex I), the audit or review shall objectively assess the following: - the degree of fulfilment of the project work plan for the relevant period and of the related deliverables; - the continued relevance of the objectives and breakthrough potential with respect to the scientific and industrial state of the art; - the resources planned and utilised in relation to the achieved progress, in a manner consistent with the principles of economy, efficiency and effectiveness; - the management procedures and methods of the project; - the beneficiaries’ contributions and integration within the project; - the expected potential impact in economic, competition and social terms, and the beneficiaries' plan for the use and dissemination of foreground. 3. Audits and reviews shall be deemed to be initiated on the date of receipt by the beneficiary(ies) of the relevant letter sent by the Commission. 4. Any such audit or review shall be carried out on a confidential basis. 5. The Commission may be assisted in technical audits and reviews by external scientific or technological experts. Prior to the carrying out of the evaluation task, the Commission shall communicate to the beneficiaries the identity of the appointed experts. The beneficiary(ies) shall have the right to refuse the participation of a particular external scientific or technological expert on grounds of commercial confidentiality. 6. Audits and reviews may be carried out remotely at the expert's home or place of work or involve sessions with project representatives either at the Commission premises or at the premises of beneficiaries. The Commission or the external scientific or technological expert may have access to the locations and premises where the work is being carried out, and to any document concerning the work. 7. The beneficiaries shall make available directly to the Commission all detailed information and data that may be re...
View SourceView Similar (25)
Technical audits and reviews. 1. The IMI JU may initiate a technical audit or review at any time during the implementation of the project and up to up to five years after the end of the project. The aim of a technical audit or review shall be to assess the work carried out under the project over a certain period, inter alia by evaluating the project reports and deliverables relevant 3 In addition to Council Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96 of 11 November 1996 concerning on-the-spot checks and inspections carried out by the Commission in order to protect the European Communities’ financial interests against fraud and other irregularities (OJ L 292, 15.11.1996, p.2) and Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 1999 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF)9 Council Regulation (Euratom) No 1074/1999 of 25 May 1999 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) (OJ L 136, 31.5.1999). to the period in question. Such audits and reviews may cover scientific, technological and other aspects relating to the proper execution of the project and the grant agreement. 2. With respect to the Description of Work (Annex I), the audit or review shall objectively assess the following: - the degree of fulfilment of the project work plan for the relevant period and of the related deliverables; - the continued relevance of the project objectives and breakthrough potential with respect to the scientific and industrial state of the art; - the resources planned and utilised in relation to the achieved progress, in a manner consistent with the principles of economy, efficiency and effectiveness; - the management procedures and methods of the project; - the beneficiaries’ contributions and integration within the project; - the expected potential impact in economic, competition and social terms, and the beneficiaries' plan for the research use and dissemination of foreground. 3. Audits and reviews shall be deemed to be initiated on the date of receipt by the beneficiary(ies) of the relevant letter sent by the IMI JU. 4. Any such audit or review shall be carried out on a confidential basis. 5. The IMI JU may be assisted in technical audits and reviews by external scientific or technological experts. Prior to the carrying out of the evaluation task, the IMI JU shall communicate to the beneficiaries the identity of the appointed experts. The beneficiary(ies) shall have the right to refuse the participation...
View SourceView Similar (3)
Technical audits and reviews. 1. The Joint Undertaking may initiate a technical audit or review at any time during the implementation of the Project and up to five years after the end of the Project. The aim of a technical audit or review shall be to assess the work carried out under the Project over a certain period, inter alia, by evaluating the Project reports and deliverables relevant to the period in question. Such audits and reviews may cover scientific, technological and other aspects, including compliance with fundamental ethical principles, relating to the proper execution of the Project and the grant agreement. 2. With respect to the Description of the Project (Annex I), the audit or review shall objectively assess the following: – the degree of fulfilment of the Project work plan for the relevant period and of the related deliverables; – the continued relevance of the objectives and breakthrough potential with respect to the scientific and industrial state of the art; – the resources planned and utilised in relation to the achieved progress, in a manner consistent with the principles of economy, efficiency and effectiveness; – the management procedures and methods of the Project; – the beneficiary's contribution and integration within the Project; – the expected potential impact in economic, competition and social terms, and the beneficiaries’ plan for the use and dissemination of Foreground. 10 OJ L 292, 15.11.1996, p.2 11 OJ L 136, 31.5.1999 3. Audits and reviews shall be deemed to be initiated on the date of receipt by the beneficiary(ies) of the relevant letter sent by the Joint Undertaking. 4. Any such audit or review shall be carried out on a confidential basis. 5. The Joint Undertaking may be assisted in technical audits and reviews by external scientific or technological experts. Prior to the carrying out of the evaluation task, the Joint Undertaking shall communicate to the beneficiaries the identity of the appointed experts. The beneficiary(ies) shall have the right to refuse the participation of a particular external scientific or technological expert on grounds of commercial confidentiality. 6. Audits and reviews may be carried out remotely at the expert's home or place of work or involve sessions with Project representatives either at the Joint Undertaking's premises or at the premises of beneficiaries. The Joint Undertaking or the external scientific or technological expert may have access to the locations and premises where the work is being carried out, and t...
View SourceView Similar (2)
Technical audits and reviews. 1. The JU may initiate a technical audit or review at any time during the implementation of the project and up to up to five years after the end of the project. The aim of a technical audit or review shall be to assess the work carried out under the project over a certain period, inter alia by evaluating the project reports and deliverables relevant to the period in question. Such audits and reviews may cover scientific, technological and other aspects relating to the proper execution of the project and the grant agreement. 2. With respect to the Description of Work (in Annex I), the audit or review shall objectively assess the following: - the degree of fulfilment of the project work plan for the relevant period and of the related deliverables;
View Source
Technical audits and reviews. 1. The REA and the Commission may initiate a technical audit or review at any time during the implementation of the project and up to up to five years after the end of the project. The aim of a technical audit or review shall be to assess the work carried out under the project over a certain period, inter alia by evaluating the project reports and deliverables relevant to the period in question. Such audits and reviews may cover scientific, technological and other aspects relating to the proper execution of the project and the grant agreement. 2. With respect to the Description of work (Annex I), the audit or review shall objectively assess the following: - the degree of fulfilment of the project work plan for the relevant period and of the related deliverables, - the continued relevance of the objectives and breakthrough potential with respect to the scientific and industrial state of the art, - the resources planned and utilised in relation to the achieved progress, in a manner consistent with the principles of economy, efficiency and effectiveness, - the management procedures and methods of the project, - the beneficiary's contributions and integration within the project, - the expected potential impact in economic, competition and social terms, and the beneficiary's plan for the use and dissemination of foreground. 3. Audits and reviews shall be deemed to be initiated on the date of receipt by the beneficiary of the relevant letter sent by the REA or the Commission. 4. Any such audit or review shall be carried out on a confidential basis.
View Source

Related to Technical audits and reviews

  • OIG INSPECTION, AUDIT, AND REVIEW RIGHTS ‌ In addition to any other rights OIG may have by statute, regulation, or contract, OIG or its duly authorized representative(s) may conduct interviews, examine or request copies of ▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ books, records, and other documents and supporting materials and/or conduct on-site reviews of any of ▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ locations for the purpose of verifying and evaluating: (a) ▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ compliance with the terms of this IA and (b) ▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ compliance with the requirements of the Federal health care programs. The documentation described above shall be made available by ▇▇▇▇▇▇ to OIG or its duly authorized representative(s) at all reasonable times for inspection, audit, and/or reproduction. Furthermore, for purposes of this provision, OIG or its duly authorized representative(s) may interview ▇▇▇▇▇▇ and any of ▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ employees or contractors who consent to be interviewed at the individual’s place of business during normal business hours or at such other place and time as may be mutually agreed upon between the individual and OIG. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ shall assist OIG or its duly authorized representative(s) in contacting and arranging interviews with such individuals upon OIG’s request. ▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ employees and contractors may elect to be interviewed with or without a representative of ▇▇▇▇▇▇ present.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Reviews (a) During the term of this Agreement and for 7 years after the term of this Agreement, the HSP agrees that the Funder or its authorized representatives may conduct a Review of the HSP to confirm the HSP’s fulfillment of its obligations under this Agreement. For these purposes the Funder or its authorized representatives may, upon 24 hours’ Notice to the HSP and during normal business hours enter the HSP’s premises to: inspect and copy any financial records, invoices and other finance- related documents, other than personal health information as defined in the Enabling Legislation, in the possession or under the control of the HSP which relate to the Funding or otherwise to the Services; and inspect and copy non-financial records, other than personal health information as defined in the Enabling Legislation, in the possession or under the control of the HSP which relate to the Funding, the Services or otherwise to the performance of the HSP under this Agreement. (b) The cost of any Review will be borne by the HSP if the Review: (1) was made necessary because the HSP did not comply with a requirement under the Enabling Legislation or this Agreement; or (2) indicates that the HSP has not fulfilled its obligations under this Agreement, including its obligations under Applicable Law and Applicable Policy. (c) To assist in respect of the rights set out in (a) above, the HSP shall disclose any information requested by the Funder or its authorized representatives and shall do so in a form requested by the Funder or its authorized representatives. (d) The HSP may not commence a proceeding for damages or otherwise against any person with respect to any act done or omitted to be done, any conclusion reached or report submitted that is done in good faith in respect of a Review.

  • Annual Audits Each fiscal year, the School shall provide for an independent annual financial audit conducted in accordance with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards and Governmental Auditing Standards and performed by a certified public accountant (CPA); provided the Commission may establish an alternative reporting requirement in accordance with State law. The Commission shall provide the guidelines and/or scope of the audit or alternative report and may require minimum CPA qualifications or that the School select from a list of qualified CPAs as provided by the Commission. The School shall provide the completed audit or alternative report to the Commission by November 15 after the conclusion of the fiscal year; provided that the Commission, with reasonable notice to the School, may change the deadline depending on circumstances. The School shall pay for the audit or alternative report if an appropriation is not made by the Legislature for such purpose.