Technical Evaluation of Proposals Clause Samples

The Technical Evaluation of Proposals clause establishes the process by which submitted proposals are assessed based on their technical merits and compliance with specified requirements. Typically, this involves a review by a designated evaluation committee, which scores or ranks proposals according to predefined technical criteria such as methodology, experience, and technical approach. This clause ensures that only proposals meeting the necessary technical standards are considered for further negotiation or award, thereby promoting fairness and ensuring that the selected solution is capable of fulfilling the project's technical needs.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 4 times
Technical Evaluation of Proposals. A two-stage procedure will be utilized in evaluating the proposals, with the technical evaluation of the proposal being completed prior to any evaluation of the Financial Proposal. The technical evaluation of proposals will be accomplished by a selection panel. The selection panel will evaluate all proposals which have passed the preliminary examination of proposals Proposal will be evaluated through a combination of a desk review of the technical proposal submitted and a subsequent editorial test according to the following criteria (the editorial test will be given after preliminary evaluation):  Linguistic/Scientific education (20 points)  Knowledge of AIDS programmes, research, planning, coordination and advocacy processes (10 points)  Demonstrated experience in Level I editing (25 points)  Demonstrated experience in Level II editing (25 points).  Knowledge of the WHO Style Guide (10 points)  Experience working with the UN System (10 points) The obtainable number of points specified for each evaluation criterion indicates the relative significance or weight of the item in the overall evaluation process. The points allocated to the technical proposal correspond to 60% of the total obtainable points.
View Source
Technical Evaluation of Proposals. A two-stage procedure will be utilized in evaluating the proposals, with technical evaluation of the proposal being completed prior to any evaluation of the Financial Proposal. The technical evaluation of proposals will be accomplished by a selection panel. The selection panel will evaluate all proposals which have passed the preliminary examination of proposals according to: • the quality of the overall proposal (10 Points); • the appropriateness of the proposed approach (15 Points); • the quality of the proposal, including: o information on the capacity and methodology of the bidder to recruit quality staff, o Information on the process for making resources available in a timely manner, and o Information on the support process that the bidder uses to facilitate the work of resources on client premises (30 Points); • the experience of the firm in carrying out related projects, (15 Points); • the qualifications and competence of the personnel proposed for the assignment (10 Points); Bidders that are successful in the technical evaluation will be invited to give a presentation (20 points). The obtainable number of points specified for each evaluation criterion indicates the relative significance or weight of the item in the overall evaluation process. The points allocated to the technical proposal correspond to 60% of the total obtainable points.
View Source
Technical Evaluation of Proposals. A two-stage procedure will be utilized in evaluating the proposals, with technical evaluation of the proposal being completed prior to any evaluation of the Financial Proposal. The technical evaluation of proposals will be accomplished by a selection panel. The selection panel will evaluate, by language (English and/or French), all proposals which have passed the preliminary examination of proposals according to:  Linguistic/Scientific education (20 points)  Knowledge of AIDS programmes, research, planning, coordination and advocacy processes (10 points)  Demonstrated experience in Level I editing (25 points)  Demonstrated experience in Level II editing (25 points).  Knowledge of the WHO Style Guide (10 points)  Experience working with the UN System (10 points) The obtainable number of points specified for each evaluation criterion indicates the relative significance or weight of the item in the overall evaluation process. The points allocated to the technical proposal correspond to 60% of the total obtainable points.
View Source
Technical Evaluation of Proposals. A two-stage procedure will be utilized in evaluating the proposals, with technical evaluation of the proposal being completed prior to any evaluation of the Financial Proposal. The technical evaluation of proposals will be accomplished by a selection panel. The selection panel will evaluate all proposals which have passed the preliminary examination of proposals according to: • the quality of the overall proposal (10 Points); • the appropriateness of the proposed schedule (30 Points); • the quality of the technical solution proposed (40 Points); • the experience of the firm in carrying out related projects (20 Points); The obtainable number of points specified for each evaluation criterion indicates the relative significance or weight of the item in the overall evaluation process.
View Source
Technical Evaluation of Proposals. A two-stage procedure will be utilized in evaluating the proposals, with technical evaluation of the proposal being completed prior to any evaluation of the Financial Proposal. The technical evaluation of proposals will be accomplished by a selection panel. The selection panel will evaluate all proposals which have passed the preliminary examination of proposals according to: • the quality of the overall proposal (20 Points); • the appropriateness of the proposed approach / ability to meet UNAIDS requirements (30 Points); • the experience of the firm in carrying out related projects and technologies (30 Points); • the qualifications and competence of the personnel proposed (20 Points); The obtainable number of points specified for each evaluation criterion indicates the relative significance or weight of the item in the overall evaluation process. The points allocated to the technical proposal correspond to 60% of the total obtainable points.
View Source

Related to Technical Evaluation of Proposals

  • Evaluation of Proposals All proposals received shall be reviewed to determine whether they meet the format requirements and the standards specified in the request for sealed proposals. The district shall evaluate the qualifications of the proposers based solely upon the criteria and evaluation methodology set forth in the request for sealed proposals, and shall assign a best value score to each proposal. Once the evaluation is complete, all responsive proposals shall be ranked from the highest best value to the lowest best value to the district.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS Proposals will be submitted to the attention of ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ at ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ no later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern, April 8, 2025.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • Presentation of Potential Target Businesses The Company shall cause each of the Initial Shareholders to agree that, in order to minimize potential conflicts of interest which may arise from multiple affiliations, the Initial Shareholders will present to the Company for its consideration, prior to presentation to any other person or company, any suitable opportunity to acquire an operating business, until the earlier of the consummation by the Company of a Business Combination or the liquidation of the Company, subject to any pre-existing fiduciary obligations the Initial Shareholders might have.