TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION Clause Samples

POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION. Evaluate the Technical Proposal on technical and cost evaluation criteria, such as, but not limited to: 1. Timber Harvest 2. Slash Treatment - Capable of the greatest utilization of Non-sawtimber and Biomass. 3. Weed Treatment. 4. Quality Control. 5. Utilization of Local Work Force.
View SourceView Similar (4)
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION. Evaluate the Technical Proposal on technical and cost evaluation criteria, such as, but not limited to: 1. Weed Treatments- Full spectrum of invasive treatments, chemical and manual 2. Treatment monitoring. 3. Mapping and documentation in NRIS and FACTS. 4. Utilization of Local Work Force.
View Source
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION. Evaluate the Technical Proposal on technical and cost evaluation criteria, such as, but not limited to:
View SourceView Similar (9)
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION. Technical Proposals will be opened first and evaluated on the basis of the criteria, given above. Proposals which obtain Technical Scores of less than 70% will be excluded from further consideration and their respective Financial Proposals will be returned to the concerned firms unopened. A Technical Score (Ts) will then be calculated as follows: TS = Sum of the scores for the Criterion for Technical Evaluation given above. The Technical Score shall account for [65%] of the Combined Evaluation Score.
View SourceView Similar (2)
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION. Technical Proposals will be opened first and evaluated on the basis of the criteria, given above. Proposals which obtain Technical Scores of less than 70% will be excluded from further consideration and their respective Financial Proposals will be returned to the concerned firms unopened.
View SourceView Similar (2)
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION. The Office of Financial Management will evaluate the proposal based on the technical portion of the Evaluation Criteria. Each Vendor is responsible for submitting all relevant, factual and correct information with their offer to enable the evaluators(s) to afford each vendor the maximum score based on the available data submitted by the Vendor. Past Vendor Performance may be considered in the award of this Contract. Vendors with a record of poor performance in the last twelve (12) months may be found non-responsible and ineligible for award.
View Source
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION. 5.3.1 A technical review committee comprised of State employees will assess the merits of the Technical Proposal. The State may engage one or more consultants or attorneys to assist in an advisory capacity. The committee will review the responses to the technical requirements of the RFP. Incomplete, inconsistent or inaccurate responses in the Technical Proposal may have a negative impact on the rating. 5.3.2 Qualified Contractors are urged to convey the technical material and other factors necessary to meet the expectations of the RFP in sufficient detail within their written Proposal, rather than to seek to negotiate or provide such factors through written Communications, and Clarifications. Noted and understood. Response to Request for Proposal No. 9800-GTA794 -- Technical Proposal
View Source

Related to TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION

  • Technical Proposal The technical proposal may be presented in free format. It shall not exceed ten pages, not counting the CVs. It shall respect the following page limit and structure: • Technical methodology (max. 7 pages) • Quality management (max. 1 page) • Project management (max. 1 page) • Resource management (proposal (max. 1 page) + CVs of experts)

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • Financial Proposal Tender Forms – prices

  • Cost Proposal After the Approved Working Drawings are approved by Landlord and Tenant, Landlord shall provide Tenant with a cost proposal in accordance with the Approved Working Drawings, which cost proposal shall include, as nearly as possible, the cost of all TI Allowance Items to be incurred by Tenant in connection with the construction of the Tenant Improvements (the "Cost Proposal"). Landlord does not guaranty the accuracy of the Cost Proposal. Notwithstanding the foregoing, portions of the cost of the Tenant Improvements may be delivered to Tenant as such portions of the Tenant Improvements are priced by Contractor (on an individual item-by-item or trade-by-trade basis), even before the Approved Working Drawings are completed (the "Partial Cost Proposal"). Tenant shall either (i) approve and deliver the Cost Proposal to Landlord within five (5) business days of the receipt of the same (or, as to a Partial Cost Proposal, within two (2) business days of receipt of the same), or (ii) notify Landlord within five (5) business days after Tenant's receipt of the Cost Proposal (or Partial Cost Proposal, as the case may be) that Tenant desires to revise the Approved Working Drawings to reduce the amount of the Cost Proposal (or Partial Cost Proposal, as the case may be), in which case such changes shall be made to the Approved Working Drawings only in accordance with Section 2.7 above and the revised Working Drawings shall be provided to the Contractor for repricing whereupon Landlord shall revise the Cost Proposal (or Partial Cost Proposal, as the case may be) for Tenant's approval. This procedure shall be repeated until the Cost Proposal (or Partial Cost Proposal, as the case may be) is approved by Tenant. The date by which Tenant has approved the Cost Proposal, or the last Partial Cost Proposal, as the case may be, shall be known hereafter as the "Cost Proposal Delivery Date." The total of all Partial Cost Proposals, if any, shall be known as the Cost Proposal.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP ▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.