TENDER EVALUATION CRITERIA Clause Samples

The Tender Evaluation Criteria clause defines the standards and methods by which submitted bids or tenders will be assessed and compared. Typically, this clause outlines specific factors such as price, technical capability, experience, and compliance with requirements, and may assign weightings to each criterion to guide the evaluation process. Its core function is to ensure a transparent, objective, and fair selection of the most suitable supplier or contractor, reducing the risk of disputes and promoting confidence in the procurement process.
TENDER EVALUATION CRITERIA. The tender offer should be unconditional and it should be for conforming to all the stipulations in the tender terms and conditions.
View SourceView Similar (6)
TENDER EVALUATION CRITERIA. 13.1 The tender offer should be unconditional and it should be for conforming to all the stipulations in the tender terms and conditions. 13.2 The tender will be evaluated as per TNTT Act. 13.3 The bidder should clearly indicate the bid takes care of the minimum wages and statutory dues. 13.4 The tenderer should offer rate per Kilograms basis mentioned in the tabular column of the commercial bid.
View SourceView Similar (3)
TENDER EVALUATION CRITERIA. 10.1 UK Sport will carry out a detailed Tender evaluation after the closing date for receipt of Tenders. Tenders will be evaluated on the basis of the most economically advantageous offer to UK Sport against the following weighted factors: Overall Price 60% Value for money based on experience offered 20% Any Added Value Services offered 20% Total 100% Knowledge and experience of working within High Performance Sport, in particular with elite coaches 40% Technical knowledge and experience of people 20% development, in particular non-technical coaching skills Experience in delivering/facilitating interactive sessions, with the content and style tailored to the specific needs of the audience 20% Experience & ability to provide 1:1 mentoring and constructive feedback to individuals 10% Ability and experience of working effectively with other members of a team 10% Total 100% 10.2 The winner will be Tenderer with the highest score against the above criteria.
View SourceView Similar (2)
TENDER EVALUATION CRITERIA. The evaluation of Tenders will be done by TNTBC as detailed below:
View SourceView Similar (2)
TENDER EVALUATION CRITERIA. The Tender Bid will be evaluated as follows
View Source
TENDER EVALUATION CRITERIA. 12.1 The tender offer should be unconditional and it should be for conforming to all the stipulations in the tender terms and conditions. The tender will be evaluated as per TNTT Act. 12.2 The successful tenders shall be responsible for the discharge of all legal obligations under various labour legislations in force. 12.3 The tenderer should offer rate per worker per day basis mentioned in the tabular column of the commercial bid. 12.4 No column should be left blank in the commercial bid. In such case the tender will not be considered for evaluation. 12.5 All inclusive end rate shall be considered for evaluation of lowest offer.
View Source
TENDER EVALUATION CRITERIA. 11.1 UK Sport will carry out a detailed Tender evaluation after the closing date for receipt of Tenders. Tenders will be evaluated on the basis of the most economically advantageous offer to UK Sport against the following weighted factors:  Charge Out Rates (Hours/Daily Rate)/Annual Fee 75%  Added Value Services (i.e. free training and seminars, discounted rates etc) 25% Total 100%  Ability and approach to undertake internal audit function of public sector grant making body 25%  Technical, experience and knowledge of the supplier and delivery staff engaged in the audit programme and ability to call specialist auditing skills in areas of IT; best value and fraud prevention 20%  Proposals for number of Internal Audit days against the requirement 15%  Demonstration of understanding UK Sport‟s main risk management issues and proposals to configure audit programme against risks to UK Sport 15%  Audit methodology in areas of approach to assignments, reporting confidentiality, ensuring continuity 15%  Proposals for support and effective reporting to Audit Committee members 10% Total 100% 11.2 After evaluation under paragraph 11.1 the scores will be moderated. The top 5 (five) Tenderers with the highest score against the above criteria will be invited to an interview with UK Sport. Any tenderers who are not selected to pass through to the interview stage will be notified in writing which shall include, the award criteria, score of the Tenderer, the names and scores of those that were selected to interview, and their participation in this tender process shall end. 11.3 At interview the selected tenderers will be invited to answers questions from a panel. That panel will moderate scores in response to interview questions. The answers to the questions shall be marked in accordance with paragraph 12 below. The winner shall be the tenderer with the highest score. The unsuccessful Tenderers notified in writing which shall include, the award criteria (interview questions), their overall score of the Tenderer, the name and score of the successful Tenderer.
View Source

Related to TENDER EVALUATION CRITERIA

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Long Term Cost Evaluation Criterion 4. READ CAREFULLY and see in the RFP document under "Proposal Scoring and Evaluation". Points will be assigned to this criterion based on your answer to this Attribute. Points are awarded if you agree not increase your catalog prices (as defined herein) more than X% annually over the previous year for the life of the contract, unless an exigent circumstance exists in the marketplace and the excess price increase which exceeds X% annually is supported by documentation provided by you and your suppliers and shared with TIPS, if requested. If you agree NOT to increase prices more than 5%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you are awarded 10 points; if 6% to 14%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you receive 1 to 9 points incrementally. Price increases 14% or greater, except when justified by supporting documentation, receive 0 points. increases will be 5% or less annually per question Required Confidentiality Claim Form This completed form is required by TIPS. By submitting a response to this solicitation you agree to download from the “Attachments” section, complete according to the instructions on the form, then uploading the completed form, with any confidential attachments, if applicable, to the “Response Attachments” section titled “Confidentiality Form” in order to provide to TIPS the completed form titled, “CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIM FORM”. By completing this process, you provide us with the information we require to comply with the open record laws of the State of Texas as they may apply to your proposal submission. If you do not provide the form with your proposal, an award will not be made if your proposal is qualified for an award, until TIPS has an accurate, completed form from you. Read the form carefully before completing and if you have any questions, email ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ at TIPS at ▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇.▇▇▇ If the vendor is awarded a contract with TIPS under this solicitation, the vendor agrees to make any Choice of Law clauses in any contract or agreement entered into between the awarded vendor and with a TIPS member entity to read as follows: "Choice of law shall be the laws of the state where the customer resides" or words to that effect.

  • Long Term Cost Evaluation Criterion # 4 READ CAREFULLY and see in the RFP document under "Proposal Scoring and Evaluation". Points will be assigned to this criterion based on your answer to this Attribute. Points are awarded if you agree not i ncrease your catalog prices (as defined herein) more than X% annually over the previous year for years two and thr ee and potentially year four, unless an exigent circumstance exists in the marketplace and the excess price increase which exceeds X% annually is supported by documentation provided by you and your suppliers and shared with TIP S, if requested. If you agree NOT to increase prices more than 5%, except when justified by supporting documentati on, you are awarded 10 points; if 6% to 14%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you receive 1 to 9 points incrementally. Price increases 14% or greater, except when justified by supporting documentation, receive 0 points. increases will be 5% or less annually per question Required Confidentiality Claim Form This completed form is required by TIPS. By submitting a response to this solicitation you agree to download from th e “Attachments” section, complete according to the instructions on the form, then uploading the completed form, wit h any confidential attachments, if applicable, to the “Response Attachments” section titled “Confidentiality Form” in order to provide to TIPS the completed form titled, “CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIM FORM”. By completing this process, you provide us with the information we require to comply with the open record laws of the State of Texas as they ma y apply to your proposal submission. If you do not provide the form with your proposal, an award will not be made if your proposal is qualified for an award, until TIPS has an accurate, completed form from you. Read the form carefully before completing and if you have any questions, email ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ at TIPS at ▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇@t ▇▇▇-▇▇▇.▇▇▇

  • Selection Criteria Each Contract is secured by a new or used Motorcycle. No Contract has a Contract Rate less than 1.00%. Each Contract amortizes the amount financed over an original term no greater than 84 months (excluding periods of deferral of first payment). Each Contract has a Principal Balance of at least $500.00 as of the Cutoff Date.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.