The Engineer Clause Samples

The Engineer. (a) shall issue instructions which in his opinion are necessary for the execution of the Works; and (b) may issue any other instruction which in his opinion is desirable in connection with the Works and/or the Project, provided that (except as required by any other provision of the Contract) the Engineer shall not be obliged to issue any instruction relating to any matter which, in his opinion, is the responsibility of the Contractor under the Contract in the absence of the instruction.

The Engineer. Resident Engineer/Project Manager shall issue a written determination of Substantial Completion with respect to such part of the Work;

The Engineer in-Charge shall decide whether and by how much to extend the Intended Completion Date within 21 days of the Contractor asking the Engineer for a decision upon the effect of a Variation and submitting full supporting information. If the Contractor has failed to give early warning of a delay or has failed to cooperate in dealing with a delay, the delay by this failure shall not be considered in assessing the new Intended Completion Date.

The Engineer. In-Charge shall decide all questions which may arise as to quality and acceptability of materials furnished and work executed, manner of execution, rate of progress of the works, interpretation of the plans and specifications and acceptability of fulfillment of the contract on the part of the contractor. He shall determine the amount and quality of the work performed and materials furnished and his decision and measurements shall be final. In all such matters and in any technical questions which may arise touching the contract, his decision shall be binding on the contractor.

The Engineer in-charge shall have full authority to depute workmen on the work site to execute other works not included in the contract. The contractor shall afford every reasonable facility, during working hours, to enable such workmen to carry out the other works provided that such works shall be carried out in such manner as not to impede the progress of the work included in the contract. The contractor, however, shall not be liable for any damage which may happen to such other works, provided he complies with the instructions in connection therewith and provided that the damage is not caused by the contractor or his workmen.

The Engineer. The Project has been designed by ESG Engineering, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the “Engineer”). The Engineer is to act as the Owner’s representative with respect to the Project, and shall assume all duties and responsibilities and have the rights and authority assigned to the Engineer in the Contract Documents in connection with completion of the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents.

The Engineer. Employer shall appoint the Engineer who shall carry out the duties assigned to Authority him in the Contract. The Engineer’s staff shall include suitably qualified engineers and other professionals who are competent to carry out these duties.

The Engineer in-Chief, Odisha agreed that the project proposal can be finalized after the capacity of catch drain is checked by the CWC and Odisha Government. The Chief Engineer ▇▇▇ indicated that this aspect will be finalized soon after Andhra Pradesh submitted the details. As the other technical aspects have already been found acceptable by CWC and Odisha Government, it should be possible to put up this project in the next Advisory Committee Meeting. 3.1 The Chief Engineer, Andhra Pradesh, was advised to modify and finalise the cost estimate of the Project considering the proposed protection wall and the structures now proposed by Odisha Government / CWC. List of Officers Attended CENTRAL WATER COMMISSION 1. Sri Z. ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇.▇. (PAO) 2. Sri ▇. ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Director PA (S) 3. ▇▇▇ ▇. Suryanarayana Director BCD (NWS) 4. Sri K. P.S. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇. Director PA (s) 5. Sri ▇. ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇ Extra Asst. Director PA (s) GOVT. OF ANDHRA PRADESH (IRRIGATION DEPTT.) 1. ▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ C.E. (Inv.) 2. Sri C. R. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ E.E. (Inv.) 3. Sri P. L. N. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇. Ex. Engr. GOVT. OF ODISHA (IRRGN. DEPTT.) 1. ▇▇▇ ▇. Mishra Engineer-in-Chief 2. Sri M. L. Lath S.E. / L.O. A meeting to discuss and resolve Inter-State issues on Vamsadhara Stage-II project of Andhra Pradesh was held on 8.3.91 in the chamber of Secretary (WR), New Delhi. The list of participants is at Annexure-‘I’. Secretary (WR) welcomed the participants to the meeting. It was noted that the Secretary, Irrigation, Government of Odisha could not attend the meeting due to the Budget session of the State Assembly and had sent a letter through their Liaison Officer in New Delhi giving comments of the Government of Odisha on the proposal of Vamsadhara Stage-II project of Andhra Pradesh. A copy of the letter was circulated in the meeting. Secretary (irrigation), Government of Andhra Pradesh indicated that the problem of flooding upstream of proposed ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ had earlier been discussed and proposals of construction of Masonry wall had been finalized in consultation with the Chief Engineer, Government of Odisha. He offered to extend the embankment upto 10.5Km in the upstream as earlier envisaged, if the Government of Odisha so desires but it may then unavoidably involve more area. Secretary (WR) stated that in view of the willingness of the Government of Andhra Pradesh to adopt any of the alternatives it is for the Government of Odisha to immediately indicate their preference. Regarding diversion of more water than its share by Andhra ...

The Engineer. In-Charge may give a written notice; cancel/terminate the whole contract or portion of it in default. Note: Failure of existing contract in full shall be where shortfall is 50% or more in 6 (six) consecutive months or in part where shortfall of Contractor is at 30% or more in 6 (six) consecutive months.) However, when Authority decides to cancel the contract in parts as per