Third and Final Warning - Written Clause Samples

Third and Final Warning - Written. If after two (2) warnings the Company considers the employee’s performance or behaviour to be unsatisfactory, the employee, in the presence of an appropriate employee representative, will be given a final warning and will be advised that continuation of such unsatisfactory service will lead to dismissal. This will be committed to writing.
View Source
Third and Final Warning - Written. The company representative in the presence of the employee concerned and the Union Secretary (or a nominee) will discuss the third breach and if substantiated a "final written warning" will be recorded on the employee's personnel record. The employee will be advised that any further transgressions may lead to dismissal. Counselling needs to concentrate on the unacceptable behaviour and discuss ways in which to improve. Deadlines need to be established with objectives and a review period set in which the individual must improve their performance. Additional training will be available and can be requested by the Company and/or the employee to avoid further transgression. Copies of the warning must be issued to the employee, Union Secretary (or nominee), Production Manager and Operations Manager.
View Source

Related to Third and Final Warning - Written

  • Independent Evaluation Buyer is an experienced and knowledgeable investor in the oil and gas business. Buyer has been advised by and has relied solely on its own expertise and legal, tax, title, reservoir engineering, environmental and other professional counsel concerning this transaction, the Properties, the value thereof and title thereto.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • Unquoted Investments External Review With respect to Eligible Portfolio Investments for which market quotations are not readily available (“Unquoted Investments”):

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • Written Evaluation The Superintendent in consultation with the Board shall review and assess the Administrator’s performance on or before February 1 of each year. The Administrator shall be formally evaluated in writing annually by the Superintendent on or before February 1 of each year. The evaluation shall include a description of the Administrator’s duties and responsibilities and the standards to which the Administrator is to perform. It shall consider the Administrator’s specific duties, responsibilities, management and competence as an Administrator; specify the Administrator’s strengths and weaknesses with supporting reasons; align with research based standards established by the Illinois State Board of Education and use data and indicators on student growth as a significant factor in rating performance. The evaluation shall also consist of a review of the Administrator’s progress toward meeting established professional, student performance and academic goals set forth in Appendix A and a review of the Administrator’s leadership and management performance relative to his current assignment. The written evaluation shall be signed by both the Superintendent and the Administrator. The Administrator may respond to the evaluation in writing and such response shall be attached to and included in the Administrator’s personnel file.