Common use of Timelines and reports Clause in Contracts

Timelines and reports. At the start of the doctorate, the doctoral student has to develop a project plan, which is also the planned timing of the project on a timeline. This is to ensure a successful processing of the doctoral project within the planned total period (usually three to four years). The PhD student must document the course of the project in regular reports to the supervisory/thesis committee Klicken oder ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Sie hier, um Text einzugeben.
(annually or bi-annually); as described in section 2a. Each report must be accompanied by an updated timeline. German universities and research institutions guarantee scientific independence in research and teaching. This freedom and independence is coupled with the individual responsibility to implement, keep and defend, if necessary, the fundamental values and standards of good scientific practice. The successful implementation of the principles of good scientific practice is a prerequisite for a high level of scientific standards. The signatories agree to comply with the principles of good scientific practice. The current guidelines of good scientific practice at the University of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and the recommendations of the DFG (German Research Foundation) on the principles of good scientific practice can be viewed on the Internet at any time: ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇/en/academic-research/graduate-academy/doctoral-candidates/legal-and-financial-issues/good-academic-practice Awareness of and sensitivity to the principles of good scientific practice: Honesty and truthfulness need to be absolute priority in scientific work. Doctoral students must know the principles of good scientific practice. Knowledge of good scientific practice is conveyed through the daily work in the working group. In addition, the visit of a course of at least one day on the subject is mandatory for doctoral students in some of the OLTECH PhD study programmes. The principles of good scientific practice can always be consulted by the doctoral candidate. Cooperation and leadership responsibility in working groups: Doctoral students are responsible for their own research work. The primary supervisor is responsible for creating a good cooperative working climate among the group members. The individual members of the working group have to trust one another to be able to work productively, because trust is the basis of an open discussion and communication culture. The cooperation within the work group must enable the presentation of scientific results, critical discussion and incorporation of this into the common pool of experience.

Timelines and reports. At the start of the doctorate, the doctoral student has to develop a project plan, which is also the planned timing of the project on a timeline. This is to ensure a successful processing of the doctoral project within the planned total period (usually three to four years). The PhD student must document the course of the project in regular reports to the supervisory/thesis committee Klicken oder ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Sie hier, um Text einzugeben.
einzugeben. (annually or bi-annually); as described in section 2a. Each report must be accompanied by an updated timeline. German universities and research institutions guarantee scientific independence in research and teaching. This freedom and independence is coupled with the individual responsibility to implement, keep and defend, if necessary, the fundamental values and standards of good scientific practice. The successful implementation of the principles of good scientific practice is a prerequisite for a high level of scientific standards. The signatories agree to comply with the principles of good scientific practice. The current guidelines of good scientific practice at the University of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and the recommendations of the DFG (German Research Foundation) on the principles of good scientific practice can always be viewed on the Internet at any timeInternet: ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇/en/academic-research/graduate-academy/doctoral-candidates/legal-and-financial-issues/good-academic-practice Awareness of and sensitivity to the principles of good scientific practice: Honesty and truthfulness need to be absolute priority in scientific work. Doctoral students must know the principles of good scientific practice. Knowledge of good scientific practice is conveyed through the daily work in the working group. In addition, the visit of a course of at least one one-day on the subject is mandatory for doctoral students in some of the OLTECH PhD study programmesstudents. The principles of good scientific practice can always be consulted by the doctoral candidate. Cooperation and leadership responsibility in working groups: Doctoral students are responsible for their own research work. The primary supervisor is responsible for creating a good cooperative working climate among the group members. The individual members of the working group have to trust one another to be able to work productively, because trust is the basis of an open discussion and communication culture. The cooperation within the work group must enable the presentation of scientific results, critical discussion and incorporation of this into the common pool of experience.

Timelines and reports. At the start of the doctorate, the doctoral student has to develop a project plan, which is also the planned timing of the project on a timeline. This is to ensure a successful processing of the doctoral project within the planned total period (usually three to four years). The PhD student must document the course of the project in regular reports to the supervisory/thesis committee Klicken oder ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Sie hier, um Text einzugeben.
einzugeben. (annually or bi-annually); as described in section 2a. Each report must be accompanied by an updated timeline. German universities and research institutions guarantee scientific independence in research and teaching. This freedom and independence is coupled with the individual responsibility to implement, keep and defend, if necessary, the fundamental values and standards of good scientific practice. The successful implementation of the principles of good scientific practice is a prerequisite for a high level of scientific standards. The signatories agree to comply with the principles of good scientific practice. The current guidelines of good scientific practice at the University of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Oldenburg and the recommendations of the DFG (German Research Foundation) on the principles of good scientific practice can be viewed on the Internet at any time: ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇/en/academic-research/graduate-academy/doctoral-candidates/legal-and-financial-issues/good-academic-practice Awareness of and sensitivity to the principles of good scientific practice: Honesty and truthfulness need to be absolute priority in scientific work. Doctoral students must know the principles of good scientific practice. Knowledge of good scientific practice is conveyed through the daily work in the working group. In addition, the visit of a course of at least one day on the subject is mandatory for doctoral students in some of the OLTECH PhD study programmes. The principles of good scientific practice can always be consulted by the doctoral candidate. Cooperation and leadership responsibility in working groups: Doctoral students are responsible for their own research work. The primary supervisor is responsible for creating a good cooperative working climate among the group members. The individual members of the working group have to trust one another to be able to work productively, because trust is the basis of an open discussion and communication culture. The cooperation within the work group must enable the presentation of scientific results, critical discussion and incorporation of this into the common pool of experience.

Timelines and reports. At the start of the doctorate, the doctoral student has to develop a project plan, which is also the planned timing of the project on a timeline. This is to ensure a successful processing of the doctoral project within the planned total period (usually three to four years). The PhD student must document the course of the project in regular reports to the supervisory/thesis committee Klicken oder ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Sie hier, um Text einzugeben.
(annually or bi-annually); as described in section 2a. Each report must be accompanied by an updated timeline. German universities and research institutions guarantee scientific independence in research and teaching. This freedom and independence is coupled with the individual responsibility to implement, keep and defend, if necessary, the fundamental values and standards of good scientific practice. The successful implementation of the principles of good scientific practice is a prerequisite for a high level of scientific standards. The signatories agree to comply with the principles of good scientific practice. The current guidelines of good scientific practice at the University of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and the recommendations of the DFG (German Research Foundation) on the principles of good scientific practice can be viewed on the Internet at any time. Guidelines of good scientific practice at UOL: ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇/uni/amtliche_mitteilungen/datei/?file=AM2022-065_Regulations_governing_principles_safeguarding_good_academic_work_EN.pdf&ts=1729634400 Recommendations of the DFG ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇/en/academic-researchresearch_funding/graduate-academyprinciples_dfg_funding/doctoral-candidates/legal-and-financial-issues/good-academic-practice good_scientific_practice/ Awareness of and sensitivity to the principles of good scientific practice: Honesty and truthfulness need to be absolute priority in scientific work. Doctoral students must know the principles of good scientific practice. Knowledge of the contents of the principles of good scientific practice is conveyed through the daily work should be imparted in the working groupcontext of work and supervision and form the basis for communication with each other. In addition, the visit of a course of at least one day on the subject is mandatory for doctoral students in some of the OLTECH PhD study programmes. The principles of good scientific practice can always be consulted by the doctoral candidate. Cooperation and leadership responsibility in working groups: Doctoral students are responsible for their own research work. The primary supervisor is responsible for creating a good cooperative working climate among the group members. The individual members of the working group have to trust one another to be able to work productively, because trust is the basis of an open discussion and communication culture. The cooperation within the work group must enable the presentation of scientific results, critical discussion and incorporation of this into the common pool of experience.

Timelines and reports. At the start of the doctorate, the doctoral student has to develop a project plan, which is also the planned timing of the project on a timeline. This is to ensure a successful processing of the doctoral project within the planned total period (usually three to four years). The PhD student must document the course of the project in regular reports to the supervisory/thesis committee Klicken oder ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Sie hier, um Text einzugeben.
einzugeben. (annually or bi-annually); as described in section 2a. Each report must be accompanied by an updated timeline. German universities and research institutions guarantee scientific independence in research and teaching. This freedom and independence is coupled with the individual responsibility to implement, keep and defend, if necessary, the fundamental values and standards of good scientific practice. The successful implementation of the principles of good scientific practice is a prerequisite for a high level of scientific standards. The signatories agree to comply with the principles of good scientific practice. The current guidelines of good scientific practice at the University of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Oldenburg and the recommendations of the DFG (German Research Foundation) on the principles of good scientific practice can always be viewed on the Internet at any timeInternet: ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇/en/academic-research/graduate-academy/doctoral-candidates/legal-and-financial-issues/good-academic-practice practice/ ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇/download/pdf/dfg_im_profil/reden_stellungnahmen/download/empfehlung_wiss_praxis_1310.pdf. Awareness of and sensitivity to the principles of good scientific practice: Honesty and truthfulness need to be absolute priority in scientific work. Doctoral students must know the principles of good scientific practice. Knowledge of good scientific practice is conveyed through the daily work in the working group. In addition, the visit of a course of at least one one-day on the subject is mandatory for doctoral students in some of the OLTECH PhD study programmesstudents. The principles of good scientific practice can always be consulted by the doctoral candidate. Cooperation and leadership responsibility in working groups: Doctoral students are responsible for their own research work. The primary supervisor is responsible for creating a good cooperative working climate among the group members. The individual members of the working group have to trust one another to be able to work productively, because trust is the basis of an open discussion and communication culture. The cooperation within the work group must enable the presentation of scientific results, critical discussion and incorporation of this into the common pool of experience.

Timelines and reports. At the start of the doctorate, doctorate the doctoral student has to develop create a project plan, which is also the planned timing of the project on a timeline. This is to ensure that a successful processing of the doctoral project within the planned total period is allowed (usually three to four years). The PhD student must is obliged to document the course of the project in regular reports to the supervisory/thesis committee Klicken oder ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Sie hier, um Text einzugeben.
Thesis Committee _________________________ (annually or bi-annually); as described in section 2a. Each report must be accompanied by an updated timeline. German universities and research institutions guarantee scientific independence in research and teaching. This freedom and independence is coupled with the individual responsibility to implement, keep and defend, if necessary, the fundamental values and standards of good scientific practice. The successful implementation of the principles of good scientific practice is a prerequisite for a high level of scientific standards. The signatories agree to comply with the principles of good scientific practice. The current guidelines of good scientific practice at the University of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and the recommendations of the DFG (German Research Foundation) on the principles of good scientific practice can always be viewed on the Internet at any time: ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇/en/academic-research/graduate-academygoodscientificpractice/ ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇/download/doctoral-candidatespdf/legal-and-financial-issuesdfg_im_profil/good-academic-practice reden_stellungnahmen/download/empfehlung_wiss_praxis_0198.pdf Awareness of and sensitivity to of the principles of good scientific practice: Honesty and truthfulness need to be absolute priority in scientific workworking. Doctoral students must know the principles of good scientific practice. Knowledge of good scientific practice is are conveyed through the daily work in the working group. In addition, the visit of a course of at least one one-day on the subject is mandatory for doctoral students in some of the OLTECH PhD study programmesstudents. The principles of good scientific practice can always be consulted by the doctoral candidate. Cooperation and leadership responsibility in working groups: Doctoral students are responsible for their own research work. The primary supervisor is responsible for creating a good cooperative working climate among the group members. The individual members of the working group have to trust one another to be able to work productively, because trust is the basis of an open discussion and communication culture. The cooperation within the work group must enable the presentation of scientific results, critical discussion and incorporation of this into the common pool of experience.