Unit Member Evaluation. The Board and the Association share the belief that the primary purpose of teacher evaluation is to improve delivery of the instructional program for the district’s students. Other functions of the formal evaluation process include: 1. Providing an opportunity for the unit member and administrator to share concepts, beliefs, and concerns. 2. Creating specific goals for instructional improvement. 3. Measuring progress in the professional growth of the teacher, and 4. Supporting administrative decisions for contract recommendations. To ensure a meaningful and effective evaluation, the process should be based upon mutual trust between the teacher and the evaluator and must follow established procedures. Toward that end, all unit members shall be assigned by their building principal and/or the Superintendent to one of three (3) evaluation tracks. These evaluation tracks and their respective guidelines are described below.
Appears in 2 contracts
Sources: Master Agreement, Master Agreement
Unit Member Evaluation. The Board and the Association share the belief that the primary purpose of teacher evaluation is to improve delivery of the instructional program for the district’s students. Other functions of the formal evaluation process include:
1. Providing an opportunity for the unit member and administrator to share concepts, beliefs, and concerns.
2. Creating specific goals for instructional improvement.
3. Measuring progress in the professional growth of the teacher, and
4. Supporting administrative decisions for contract recommendations. To ensure a meaningful and effective evaluation, the process should be based upon mutual trust between the teacher and the evaluator and must follow established procedures. Toward that end, all unit members members’ shall be assigned by their building principal and/or the Superintendent to one of three (3) evaluation tracks. These evaluation tracks and their respective guidelines are described below.
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Master Agreement