University Review Sample Clauses

University Review. 1) The University's written response will be issued to the grievant and the representative, if any, within fifteen (15) calendar days after the formal grievance is filed. If the response is not issued within this time limit, or if the grievance is not resolved at Step 1, the grievance may proceed to Step 2. 2) Resolution of the grievance at Step 1 or earlier, although final, shall not be precedent-setting.
View SourceView Similar (22)
University Review. The traditional Faculty governance bodies, specifically the Faculty Senate and the Graduate Council, shall be responsible for preparing their final analysis and recommendations to the Board of Trustees within the specified deadline. Thereafter, the Board of Trustees shall make the final decision on the proposed plan. If the proposed plan undergoes substantive modification(s) once it has been submitted, with unit and Association reports to the Faculty Senate or Graduate Council, the Chair or Director of the affected unit(s) shall be informed of the modifications.
View SourceView Similar (5)
University Review a. Grievances may be submitted to Step 3 when: 1) an employee grievance is not resolved, or written answer is not sent, within ten (10) work days after the Step 2 meeting; 2) the Union is filing a grievance; or 3) the grievance is the result of a suspension without pay or a discharge. b. All such grievances must be received by the Berkeley Campus Personnel Office within ten (10) work days after the grievant knew or should have known of the facts qualifying for a Step 3 grievance. c. Grievances which are initiated at Step 3 shall be reduced to writing on a form agreed to by the parties. The grievance shall be dated and signed by the grievant and shall set forth the information listed in Step 2, Article 24.B.2.b. d. Upon receipt of the written grievance by the University, a University Review Committee shall be convened to meet with the grievant and his or her representative, if any, to review the grievance, and to attempt to reach a resolution of the grievance. Within ten (10) work days after receipt of the step 3 grievance, the parties shall set a time and place for the University Review Committee Meeting. This is the last step for the grievant or his/her representative to present known facts or information which supports the grievant's contentions. e. The University Review Committee shall consider all information presented in the meeting, and must respond to the grievant in writing within ten (10) work days of the conclusion of the meeting. The decision becomes final on the twenty-first (21st) work day after the date of issuance, unless a timely request for arbitration is received from the Union on or before the twentieth (20th) work day. A copy of the decision will be mailed to the employee's representative and to the Union.
View SourceView Similar (3)
University Review. All contracts between SMG and subcontractors shall be subject to the review and prior approval of the University before becoming operative. Specifically, any provision in any contract concerning the controls on the quality of food to be provided at the Convocation Center shall receive the prior approval of the University. The provisions of Section 5.1 regarding the approval by the University of Event contracts shall also be applicable to the approval by the University of subcontracts. Subject to the provisions of the next sentence, subcontracts which involve only a single Event at the Convocation Center shall be exempt from the provisions of this Section 15.
View Source
University Review. Proposals specifically conceiving new degrees or altered degree requirements must also undergo review by the Faculty Council’s Committee on Curriculum and Programs (CCP) and be approved by the Faculty Council. While the SNL initiatives process is modeled after the university process to be efficient for the proposer proposals falling into university review categories should review and strictly adhere to the requirements provided in the CCP guidelines. Proposers should work closely with the SNL CCP representative.
View Source

Related to University Review

  • STATEWIDE ACHIEVEMENT TESTING When CONTRACTOR is a NPS, per implementation of Senate Bill 484, CONTRACTOR shall administer all Statewide assessments within the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (“CAASPP”), Desired Results Developmental Profile (“DRDP”), California Alternative Assessment (“CAA”), achievement and abilities tests (using LEA-authorized assessment instruments), the Fitness Gram, , the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (“ELPAC”), and as appropriate to the student, and mandated by LEA pursuant to LEA and state and federal guidelines. CONTRACTOR is subject to the alternative accountability system developed pursuant to Education Code section 52052, in the same manner as public schools. Each LEA student placed with CONTRACTOR by the LEA shall be tested by qualified staff of CONTRACTOR in accordance with that accountability program. ▇▇▇ shall provide test administration training to CONTRACTOR’S qualified staff. CONTRACTOR shall attend LEA test training and comply with completion of all coding requirements as required by ▇▇▇.

  • Diversity Report The Contractor shall report to each Customer, spend with certified and other minority business enterprises. These reports shall include the period covered, the name, minority code and Federal Employer Identification Number of each minority business utilized during the period, Commodities provided by the minority business enterprise, and the amount paid to each minority business on behalf of each purchasing agency ordering under the terms of this Contract.

  • Research Analyst Independence The Company acknowledges that the Underwriters’ research analysts and research departments are required to be independent from their respective investment banking divisions and are subject to certain regulations and internal policies, and that such Underwriters’ research analysts may hold views and make statements or investment recommendations and/or publish research reports with respect to the Company and/or the offering that differ from the views of their respective investment banking divisions. The Company hereby waives and releases, to the fullest extent permitted by law, any claims that the Company may have against the Underwriters with respect to any conflict of interest that may arise from the fact that the views expressed by their independent research analysts and research departments may be different from or inconsistent with the views or advice communicated to the Company by such Underwriters’ investment banking divisions. The Company acknowledges that each of the Underwriters is a full service securities firm and as such from time to time, subject to applicable securities laws, may effect transactions for its own account or the account of its customers and hold long or short positions in debt or equity securities of the companies that may be the subject of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

  • Technology Research Analyst Job# 1810 General Characteristics