Use of Outcome Assessments Sample Clauses

Use of Outcome Assessments. The goal of the Parties in entering into the Settlement Agreement is to ensure that 10 that SPD’s use of force is consistent with the requirements of the United States Constitution and 11 42 U.S.C. § 14141. As more fully described in the section on termination of the Settlement 12 Agreement, if the City is able to establish, through outcome measures, that the purposes of the 13 Settlement Agreement have been met, the decree may terminate even if the City is not in full and 14 effective compliance with the specific process terms. 15 187. Three years after the Effective Date of the Settlement Agreement, the City and 16 SPD may demonstrate “full and effective compliance” by showing that the standard and 17 established practice of SPD officers is to use force within constitutional limits and that no pattern 18 or practice of the use of excessive force exists, as demonstrated by the outcome assessments set 19 forth in the Settlement Agreement. The Monitor will conduct these outcome assessments to 20 determine whether SPD is in full and effective compliance by this method. The Parties may also 21 use the outcome assessments to consider whether the implementation of the Settlement 22 Agreement has had any unintended negative consequences on either accomplishing the purposes 23 1 of the Settlement Agreement or the ability of SPD to conduct effective and constitutional 2 policing.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Use of Outcome Assessments. The goal of the Parties in entering into the Settlement Agreement is to ensure that that SPD’s use of force is consistent with the requirements of the United States Constitution and 42 U.S.C. § 14141. As more fully described in the section on termination of the Settlement Agreement, if the City is able to establish, through outcome measures, that the purposes of the Settlement Agreement have been met, the decree may terminate even if the City is not in full and effective compliance with the specific process terms. 187. Three years after the Effective Date of the Settlement Agreement, the City and SPD may demonstrate “full and effective compliance” by showing that the standard and established practice of SPD officers is to use force within constitutional limits and that no pattern or practice of the use of excessive force exists, as demonstrated by the outcome assessments set forth in the Settlement Agreement. The Monitor will conduct these outcome assessments to determine whether SPD is in full and effective compliance by this method. The Parties may also use the outcome assessments to consider whether the implementation of the Settlement Agreement has had any unintended negative consequences on either accomplishing the purposes of the Settlement Agreement or the ability of SPD to conduct effective and constitutional policing.
View Source

Related to Use of Outcome Assessments

  • Ergonomic Assessments At the request of the employee, the College will ensure that an ergonomic assessment of the employee’s work station is completed by a person trained by the Department of Labor and Industries or comparable trainer to conduct ergonomic assessments. Solutions to identified issues/concerns will be implemented within available resources.

  • Risk Assessments a. Risk Assessment - DST shall, at least annually, perform risk assessments that are designed to identify material threats (both internal and external) against Fund Data, the likelihood of those threats Schedule 10.2 p.2 occurring and the impact of those threats upon DST organization to evaluate and analyze the appropriate level of information security safeguards (“Risk Assessments”). b. Risk Mitigation - DST shall use commercially reasonable efforts to manage, control and remediate threats identified in the Risk Assessments that it believes are likely to result in material unauthorized access, copying, use, processing, disclosure, alteration, transfer, loss or destruction of Fund Data, consistent with the Objective, and commensurate with the sensitivity of the Fund Data and the complexity and scope of the activities of DST pursuant to the Agreement. c. Security Controls Testing - DST shall, on approximately an annual basis, engage an independent external party to conduct a review (including information security) of DST’s systems that are related to the provision of services. DST shall have a process to review and evaluate high risk findings resulting from this testing.

  • Data Protection Impact Assessments Workday will, at Customer’s request and subject to the confidentiality terms set forth in the UMSA, make its most recent Audit Reports and Certifications available to Customer. To the extent Customer requires additional assistance to meet its obligations under applicable Data Protection Laws to carry out a data protection impact assessment and prior consultation with the competent supervisory authority related to Customer’s use of the Covered Service, Workday will, taking into account the nature of Processing and the information available to Workday, provide reasonable assistance to Customer.

  • Impact Assessments 5.1 The Parties shall: (a) provide all reasonable assistance to the each other to prepare any data protection impact assessment as may be required (including provision of detailed information and assessments in relation to Processing operations, risks and measures); and (b) maintain full and complete records of all Processing carried out in respect of the Personal Data in connection with the contract, in accordance with the terms of Article 30 GDPR.

  • Security Assessments Upon advance written notice by the JBE, Contractor agrees that the JBE shall have reasonable access to Contractor’s operational documentation, records, logs, and databases that relate to data security and the Contractor’s Information Security Program. Upon the JBE’s request, Contractor shall, at its expense, perform, or cause to have performed an assessment of Contractor’s compliance with its privacy and data security obligations. Contractor shall provide to the JBE the results, including any findings and recommendations made by Contractor’s assessors, of such assessment, and, at its expense, take any corrective actions.