Workload Review Committee Sample Clauses

The Workload Review Committee clause establishes a designated group responsible for evaluating and addressing concerns related to employee workload. Typically, this committee is composed of representatives from both management and staff, and it reviews cases where employees believe their assigned duties exceed reasonable expectations or contractual limits. By providing a formal mechanism for workload assessment and dispute resolution, this clause helps ensure fair distribution of work and prevents overburdening employees, thereby promoting a balanced and sustainable work environment.
Workload Review Committee. The College and the Association will establish a Workload Review Committee no later than September 30, 2001 that will examine the workload inequities created by the discounting of instructional hours, by the unique working conditions in the Aviation Department, and by the increasing demands upon non-instructional faculty. The work of the committee will include: 1. recommending to the College solutions to workload inequities or problems that could be reasonably achieved with current financial resources within the life of the agreement. 2. recommending to the College and Association solutions to the problems above that require more resources than are currently available, for discussion in the next round of bargaining. 3. providing or vetting the local workload information that will be provided to the provincial workload study to be conducted as part of the Protocol for the Common Agreement. In addition, the committee will be responsible for the allocation of the Alocal negotiations@ money assigned by the Common Agreement to the Association and the College that remains after any other compensation items agreed to have been costed. The committee will apply the remaining funds to improving workload conditions in the area(s) of most urgent need as determined by the committee. The targeted area(s) will be identified no later than the end of the first year of this agreement (March 31, 2002). The composition of the committee will be determined after the ratification of this agreement, but Association members will constitute a majority of one.
View SourceView Similar (4)
Workload Review Committee. As part of the University’s commitment to workload management a Professional Staff Workload Review Committee will be established.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Workload Review Committee. A workload review committee consisting of the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and Vice-President Academic and the President of the Association shall investigate any alleged or suspected workload inequities reported by Academic Staff and/or Administration personnel. Within ten (10) working days, the committee shall study relevant documents and conduct interviews as necessary; review the assigned workload for reasoned equity across work unit, School and Institute; and report to the Institute and the Association.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Workload Review Committee. The committee will be made up of three (3) members selected by the union and three (3) members selected by management, and each member shall be appointed for a two (2) year term. Alternate members may be identified in occasions where a member’s involvement may create a conflict of interest given the discipline (field of study) being evaluated.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Workload Review Committee. (a) A Workload Review Committee shall be established to deal with concerns related to the quantum of workload unable to be resolved within the faculty. (b) The Workload Review Committee shall consist of four people being a nominee of the CEO, a nominee of the Section Head/HoF concerned, a nominee of TEU and a nominee of the teaching staff member(s) concerned. (c) A separate voting chairperson may be appointed.
View Source
Workload Review Committee. A committee shall be established consisting of three members appointed by the RPSTA and three members appointed by the Board, to undertake a collaborative problem-solving process to engage teachers at the school level to identify and address issues that result in school division and school improvements with respect to teacher workload. The committee shall review procedures, best practices, school and division programming, and examine factors that contribute to intensification. In witness whereof the signing officers of the respective parties have set their hands at Regina, Saskatchewan, this day of , 2016. Signed on behalf of the teachers of the Signed on Behalf of the Board of Education Regina School Division No. 4 of the Regina School Division No. 4 of Saskatchewan LINC Chairperson – ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Chairperson – ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Secretary-Treasurer – ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
View Source
Workload Review Committee. 5.6.1 A Workload Review Committee shall be established to deal with complaints of excessive workload. 5.6.2 The Workload Review Committee shall consist of four (4) people being a nominee of the CEO, a nominee of the Executive Director, Learning Delivery, a nominee of TEU and a nominee of the employee concerned. 5.6.3 The Workload Review Committee shall: (a) set its own procedure; (b) be required to take into account appropriate contractual provisions in its deliberations; (c) endeavour to resolve the dispute by discussion with the parties but, failing that, to investigate the complaint (after giving both sides an opportunity to be heard) and then make recommendations to the Executive Director, Learning Delivery. 5.6.4 Recommendations shall be in writing and copies shall be provided to both parties who shall have an opportunity to comment. The Executive Director, Learning Delivery shall receive the written recommendations and any comments made by the parties before making their decision.
View Source
Workload Review Committee. 4.5.1 Workload Review Committee shall be established to deal with complaints of excessive workload. 4.5.2 The Workload Review Committee shall consist of four (4) people being a nominee of the CEO, a nominee of the Executive Director, Learning Delivery, a nominee of TEU and a nominee of the employee concerned.
View Source
Workload Review Committee a) A Workload Review Committee shall be established to deal with concerns related to the quantum of workload unable to be resolved within the faculty. b) The Workload Review Committee shall consist of four people being a nominee of the CEO, a nominee of the Section Head/HoF concerned, a nominee of TEU and a nominee of the teaching staff member(s) concerned. c) A separate voting chairperson may be appointed. d) The Workload Review Committee will be required to take into account appropriate contractual provisions in its deliberations, and consider submissions from teaching staff member(s) about workload and or workload issue. e) The Workload Review Committee shall be constituted as set out in subclause 3.1.3 (b), where: . Committee discussions are without prejudice and in confidence. . Invitations may be extended to other parties to advise the committee in its deliberations. . The committee will determine the frequency and length of meetings. . The parties shall negotiate a report back date. Such report to contain a finding where possible and/or recommendations for resolving the workload issue. . The initial submission will be in writing. The committee may seek further oral and written submissions. . All submissions will be given full and thorough consideration by the Committee. f) The Final Report of the Committee will be provided to the parties. g) In making a determination in respect of that teaching staff member(s) workload, the committee will attempt to resolve the issue through discussion with the parties concerned. h) In the event of the initial concern not being resolved by this process, the CEO shall review the matter and make a final decision
View Source

Related to Workload Review Committee

  • Review Committee The Board representatives agree to have meetings during the school year with the West Branch- Rose City Education Association to discuss problems that may or may not be covered by the provisions of this Agreement; said meetings and problems pertaining to the West Branch-Rose City Area Schools must have a reasonable advance notice and tentative agenda.

  • Training Committee The parties to this Agreement may form a Training Committee. The Training Committee will be constituted by equal numbers of Employer nominees and ETU employee representatives and have a charter which clearly states its role and responsibilities. It shall monitor the clauses of this Agreement which relate to training and ensure all employees have equal access to training.

  • Scheduling Committee This Committee shall be a function of the Hospital-Association Committee and shall examine scheduling/staffing patterns on units brought to its attention and shall review suggested changes to current schedules or staffing on a unit basis. Where the Committee finds significant change(s) to be proposed, it may require a vote of the nurses on the unit to be held.

  • Development Committee Arcadia and ▇▇▇▇▇▇ shall establish a development committee (the “Development Committee”) comprised of no more than three (3) representatives of each of Arcadia and ▇▇▇▇▇▇. The Development Committee shall be chaired by a member thereof designated from time to time by Arcadia. The Development Committee shall oversee the Research Plan, Milestones and development and production of plants and microorganisms that produce Transgenic Oil in accordance with the Research Plan. The Development Committee may revise the Research Plan and the Milestones as deemed necessary and appropriate by unanimous written consent of all members. Meetings of the Development Committee shall be at least biannual and at such times and places or in such form (e.g., in person, telephonic or video conference) as the members of the Development Committee shall determine. Representatives of both Parties shall be present at any meeting of the Development Committee. Decisions of the Development Committee shall be made by a written consent signed by all six (6) members thereof. The Development Committee shall keep minutes of its deliberations setting forth, among other matters, all proposed actions and all votes thereon. All records of the Development Committee shall at all times be available to both Parties. The Development Committee by unanimous consent may delegate to one Party or to a specific representative the authority to make certain decisions. The Development Committee may revoke such authority by the written consent of four members. All disagreements within the Development Committee shall be subject to the following: (i) The members of the committee will endeavor in good faith for a period of not more than ninety (90) days to attempt to resolve the disagreement; (ii) If the members of the committee are unable to resolve the disagreement by the end of such period, the committee shall promptly present the disagreement to the President of ▇▇▇▇ Products Division and the President of Arcadia or their respective designees, and the two executives shall endeavor to resolve the disagreement for a period of not more than thirty (30) days; (iii) If the two executives are unable to resolve this disagreement, the disagreement shall be submitted for ADR as provided in Section 12(a).

  • Operating Committee the Consortium’s managing body, composed of representatives of the Manager and the Contractors, pursuant to Annex XI.