Workload Review. A staff member who believes that the workload assigned to them by their Head of School (or equivalent) is inconsistent with the guidelines above, for example, it is: a) inequitable – that is, given the staff member’s academic classification level and fraction of employment, their workload is not fair in comparison to the workloads of other staff in the School, or b) unreasonable – that is, could not be expected to be completed by a staff member with the required knowledge and abilities within the 1725 hour limitation (pro-rata for part-time staff), or c) unbalanced – that is, does not provide adequate opportunity to undertake a balanced range of workload elements, should in the first instance discuss the matter with their Head of School (or equivalent) to seek a variation in their workload allocation. If this does not lead to a resolution of their concern they may seek a review by their Pro Vice Chancellor. Allocation of activities in accordance with the Academic Workload Guidelines will be one aspect considered as part of the workload review.
Appears in 2 contracts
Sources: Enterprise Agreement, Enterprise Agreement