Comparable Evaluations definition
Comparable Evaluations. Since seniority may not be the basis for teacher retention or other employment decisions, except when deciding between teachers who have comparable evaluations, this refers to teachers within the categories of "Ineffective," "Developing," "Skilled," and "
Comparable Evaluations. For the purpose of this Agreement, “comparable” shall mean all teachers rated above “Ineffective” for their Final Summative Rating shall be comparable and equal.
Comparable Evaluations for purposes of this section means “Accomplished” and “Skilled” pursuant to the most recent final summative evaluation rating.
Examples of Comparable Evaluations in a sentence
Comparable Evaluations: Suspension of bargaining unit members, and recall of eligible bargaining unit members whose contracts have been suspended pursuant to a RIF, will not be based upon seniority, except in circumstances when choosing between employees with “comparable” holistic teacher performance ratings.
Comparable Evaluations: Based on the average of three (3) years of summative evaluations.
In the first tier, teachers whose most recent summative evaluation rating was accomplished, skilled and developing are considered to have Comparable Evaluations.
For the 2014-2015 school year, the definition of Comparable Evaluations will fall into two separate tiers.
The Board shall not give preference to any teacher based on seniority, except when making a decision between teachers who have Comparable Evaluations.
More Definitions of Comparable Evaluations
Comparable Evaluations means certificated/licensed personnel receiving the same summative rating on the OTES evaluation.
Comparable Evaluations are defined as certificated/licensed teachers with identical summative evaluation ratings on the most recent evaluation.
Comparable Evaluations means “Accomplished” and “Skilled” are comparable, “Developing” is comparable to “Developing,” and “Ineffective” is comparable to “Ineffective.” This provision is in place for the duration of this contract and will remain in effect unless the state evaluation system changes in Ohio Revised Code.
Comparable Evaluations since seniority may not be the basis for teacher retention or other employment decisions, except when deciding between teachers who have comparable evaluations, this refers to teachers within the categories of “Ineffective,” “Developing,” “Skilled,” and “Accomplished.” Removal of poorly performing teachers will be in accordance with the nonrenewal and termination statutes of the Ohio Revised Code and/or the relevant provisions of the collective bargaining agreement in effect between the Board and the Jefferson County Joint Vocational School Teachers’ Association. Nothing in this policy will be deemed to prevent the Board from exercising its rights to nonrenew, terminate, or suspend a teaching contract as provided by law and the terms of the collective bargaining agreement in effect between it and the Jefferson County Joint Vocational School Teachers’ Association. The evaluation system and procedures set forth in this policy shall not create an expectation of continued employment for teachers on a limited contract that are evaluated under this policy. The Board reserves the right to nonrenew a teacher evaluated under this policy in accordance with R.C. 3319.11 notwithstanding the teacher’s holistic rating.
Comparable Evaluations means:
Comparable Evaluations. Since seniority may not be the basis for teacher retention or other employment decisions, except when deciding between teachers who have comparable evaluations, the Summative evaluation ratings are Accomplished, Skilled, Developing and Ineffective. STANDARDS BASED TEACHER EVALUATION Teacher evaluations will utilize multiple factors, with the intent of providing meaningful feedback to each teacher and assigning an effectiveness rating based in equal part upon teacher performance and student growth. Each teacher evaluation will result in an effectiveness rating of: • Accomplished; • Skilled; • Developing; or • Ineffective The specific standards and criteria for distinguishing between these ratings/levels of performance shall be the same as those developed by the State Board of Education, which are incorporated herein by reference. The Superintendent shall annually file a report to the Department of Education the number of teachers for whom an evaluation was conducted as well as the number of teachers assigned each rating as set forth above, aggregated by teacher preparation programs from which and the years in which the teachers graduated. Fifty percent (50%) of each evaluation will be based upon teacher performance and fifty percent (50%) on multiple measures of student growth as set forth herein. Any modifications to these percentages must be in accordance with the Ohio Revised Code and in consultation with the Evaluation Committee. Assessment of Teacher Performance
Comparable Evaluations since seniority may not be the basis for school counselor retention or other employment decisions, except when deciding between counselors who have comparable evaluations, this refers to counselors within the categories of “Ineffective,” “Developing,” “Skilled,” and “Accomplished.” Removal of poorly performing school counselors will be in accordance with the nonrenewal and termination statutes of the Ohio Revised Code and /or the relevant provisions of the collective bargaining agreement in effect between the Board and the Switzerland of Ohio Education Association. Nothing in this policy will be deemed to prevent the Board from exercising its rights to non- renew, terminate, or suspend a school counselor contract as provided by law and the terms of the collective bargaining agreement in effect between it and the Switzerland of Ohio Education Association. The evaluation system and procedures set forth in this policy shall not create an expectation of continued employment of employees on a limited contract that are evaluated under this policy. The Board reserves the right to non-renew a school counselor evaluated under this policy in accordance with R.C. 3319.11 notwithstanding the school counselor’s final summative rating. R.C. 3319.02, 3319.11, 3319.113, R.C. 3319.16 A.C. 3301-24-05 H.B. 64