2009-10 SYSTEM WIDE INDICATORS Clause Samples

The "2009-10 System Wide Indicators" clause establishes a set of standardized metrics or benchmarks to be used across an entire system, such as a network of schools, hospitals, or business units, for the 2009-2010 period. These indicators might include performance measures like graduation rates, patient outcomes, or financial targets, and are applied uniformly to assess progress and outcomes throughout the system. By defining these indicators, the clause ensures consistent measurement and reporting, facilitating comparison, accountability, and informed decision-making across all entities within the system.
2009-10 SYSTEM WIDE INDICATORS. The 2009-10 Report Back has been changed from previous years' format to collect information only on system-wide indicators and will reflect and report on progress on Confederation’s commitments regarding access, quality and accountability as outlined in the original accountability agreements. • The 2009-10 Report Back is also requesting data on credit transfer, online learning and international students. This is in keeping with the government's strategic priorities and as per discussions with Colleges Ontario and Council of Ontario Universities. This will allow the Ministry to benchmark and track progress on new key initiatives such as achieving a 70% PSE attainment rate while continuing to measure progress on Reaching Higher objectives. The data collected from the 2009-10 Report Back will also inform the creation of system-wide targets to be introduced in 2010-11 by TCU in consultation with the sector. • System Wide Indicators for 2009-10: 1) Enrolment – Headcount 2) Under-Represented Students: Students with Disabilities, First Generation and Aboriginal 3) Compliance with the Student Access Guarantee (SAG) in 2009-10 4) The Student Access Guarantee (SAG) for 2010-11 5) Participation in the Credit Transfer System 6) Class Size 7) Online Learning 8) International 9) Supply Chain Compliance 10) Space Utilization 11) College Student Satisfaction 12) Graduation Rate 13) Graduate Employment Rate 14) Student Retention Rates 15) Quality of the Learning Environment 1) Enrolment – Headcount*
View SourceView Similar (27)

Related to 2009-10 SYSTEM WIDE INDICATORS

  • Performance Indicators The HSP’s delivery of the Services will be measured by the following Indicators, Targets and where applicable Performance Standards. In the following table: INDICATOR CATEGORY INDICATOR P=Performance Indicator E=Explanatory Indicator M=Monitoring Indicator 2022/23 Organizational Health and Financial Indicators Debt Service Coverage Ratio (P) 1 ≥1 Total Margin (P) 0 ≥0 Coordination and Access Indicators Percent Resident Days – Long Stay (E) n/a n/a Wait Time from Home and Community Care Support Services (HCCSS) Determination of Eligibility to LTC Home Response (M) n/a n/a Long-Term Care Home Refusal Rate (E) n/a n/a Quality and Resident Safety Indicators Percentage of Residents Who Fell in the Last 30 days (M) n/a n/a Percentage of Residents Whose Pressure Ulcer Worsened (M) n/a n/a Percentage of Residents on Antipsychotics Without a Diagnosis of Psychosis (M) n/a n/a Percentage of Residents in Daily Physical Restraints (M) n/a n/a

  • KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 10.1 The Supplier shall at all times during the Framework Period comply with the Key Performance Indicators and achieve the KPI Targets set out in Part B of Framework Schedule 2 (Goods and/or Services and Key Performance Indicators).

  • System Logging The system must maintain an automated audit trail which can 20 identify the user or system process which initiates a request for PHI COUNTY discloses to 21 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY, 22 or which alters such PHI. The audit trail must be date and time stamped, must log both successful and 23 failed accesses, must be read only, and must be restricted to authorized users. If such PHI is stored in a 24 database, database logging functionality must be enabled. Audit trail data must be archived for at least 3 25 years after occurrence.

  • Statewide HUB Program Statewide Procurement Division Note: In order for State agencies and institutions of higher education (universities) to be credited for utilizing this business as a HUB, they must award payment under the Certificate/VID Number identified above. Agencies, universities and prime contractors are encouraged to verify the company’s HUB certification prior to issuing a notice of award by accessing the Internet (▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇/tpasscmblsearch/index.jsp) or by contacting

  • STATEWIDE ACHIEVEMENT TESTING When CONTRACTOR is a NPS, per implementation of Senate Bill 484, CONTRACTOR shall administer all Statewide assessments within the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (“CAASPP”), Desired Results Developmental Profile (“DRDP”), California Alternative Assessment (“CAA”), achievement and abilities tests (using LEA-authorized assessment instruments), the Fitness Gram, , the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (“ELPAC”), and as appropriate to the student, and mandated by LEA pursuant to LEA and state and federal guidelines. CONTRACTOR is subject to the alternative accountability system developed pursuant to Education Code section 52052, in the same manner as public schools. Each LEA student placed with CONTRACTOR by the LEA shall be tested by qualified staff of CONTRACTOR in accordance with that accountability program. ▇▇▇ shall provide test administration training to CONTRACTOR’S qualified staff. CONTRACTOR shall attend LEA test training and comply with completion of all coding requirements as required by ▇▇▇.